Love this. That would be a tempting upgrade down the line.a dynamic island in landscape mode (thus bringing slimmer bezels) is the best solutionView attachment 2079777
Love this. That would be a tempting upgrade down the line.a dynamic island in landscape mode (thus bringing slimmer bezels) is the best solutionView attachment 2079777
Apple won't put an OLED on an iPad until it can get brighter at a similar cost. A panel that large with a double stacked OLED panel to generate 1500 nits+ would be dreadfully expensive, which is why Apple went mini-LED. I have a Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra, and sure it has a great OLED screen, but it tops out at 400 nits (avg brightness is closer to 250 nits). It's adequate but awfully dim. Once Samsung is able to reliably supply such a large, bright panel, the iPad Pros will get those OLEDs. Apple really wants its iPad screens to be able to handle real HDR at 1600 nits or more, not the phony HDR400 that so many devices claim to support.I would like an oled screen. But Apple always needs to hold something back... MAYBE mini led next year. oled in about 5 years from now. haha
I have a Galaxy tab S8+ with gorgeous amoled display that I love, but there are still a few apps that keep drawing me to apple (damn developers! release you good stuff on other platforms!)
But yes, other than those couple of apps, I can be much more productive on any other OS.
The M1 iPad Pros are still a good buy now. It doesn’t matter what the M2 iPad Pro offers when you can get an entirely overkill hardware M1 iPad Pro for really good deals.And MacRumors buyers guide probably said DO NOT BUY about 3 months after it came out 🙄
Yeah that’s a good point. The mini LED display on my 12.9 is super bright, and HDR content is really nice to watch movies.Apple won't put an OLED on an iPad until it can get brighter at a similar cost. A panel that large with a double stacked OLED panel to generate 1500 nits+ would be dreadfully expensive, which is why Apple went mini-LED. I have a Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra, and sure it has a great OLED screen, but it tops out at 400 nits (avg brightness is closer to 250 nits). It's adequate but awfully dim. Once Samsung is able to reliably supply such a large, bright panel, the iPad Pros will get those OLEDs. Apple really wants its iPad screens to be able to handle real HDR at 1600 nits or more, not the phony HDR400 that so many devices claim to support.
Samsung Display achieves 1750 nits on its S22 Ultra and 2000 nits on the iPhone 14 Pros and Apple Watch Ultra by the use of double stacked panels, so it's close. They just need to come down in price for a panel as large as 11-13". That may happen in a couple of years at best. Or perhaps, Samsung might be able to adopt their QD-OLED panels since they have them in a pair of $1400 monitors (along with S95B and A95K TV's) right now, though the pixel density on those monitors leaves a lot to be desired.
I'm with you, though. Once Apple releases an OLED iPad with bright screens, I'll ditch my M1 iPad Pro. I'm just not holding my breath waiting for the cost to come down. For now, I'll enjoy my dim S8 Ultra and bright mini-LED iPad.
I can’t think of any upgrade that would make me switch from M1 12.9" to next gen in the upcoming years. Hardware wise it’s perfect in every way, the XDR display, the four speakers and M1 that simply will be as good for everything in 5 years as it is now. It’s only iPadOS that is lagging behind the development, far from macOS that is today.
I’m in the same boat, but with the 2018 iPad Pro 11”. On paper, the M1 and M2 are light-years ahead in performance, but in real world use with iPadOS in its current state, I doubt I would even be able to tell the difference between A12X Bionic and M2.I can’t think of any upgrade that would make me switch from M1 12.9" to next gen in the upcoming years. Hardware wise it’s perfect in every way, the XDR display, the four speakers and M1 that simply will be as good for everything in 5 years as it is now. It’s only iPadOS that is lagging behind the development, far from macOS that is today.
I think from a battery perspective yes, but unless you're doing heavy-duty video editing or Swift playgrounds on your iPad, I doubt most casual iPad users (which is most of them) will notice the difference between an A12X and M1 for things like web browsing and ebook reading.If all it is, is a replacement of an M1 with an M2 then there is no pressing need for current M1 IPP owners to upgrade. IpadOS will keep any practical difference negligible.
However, previous A series IPP owners will definitely benefit considerably. The battery in my 10.5 IPP is pretty stuffed and I look forward to upgrading, and have been waiting more than a year.
The M1 iPad Pros are still a good buy now. It doesn’t matter what the M2 iPad Pro offers when you can get an entirely overkill hardware M1 iPad Pro for really good deals.
I disagree, at least for my use. I had a 2018 iPad Pro and found it laggy in daily use. The M1 was the first iPad I used that felt like it was waiting on the software instead of the other way around.Ha ing owned the 2018 12.9 and now the 2021 M1 12.9, the differences in day to day are indeed trivial, other than a much better display for movies on the 2021. That is a testament of the 2018 and the fact iPadOS is only now becoming more hardware intensive.
I'd love to do this but I need a new battery. I got mine at launch and use it daily.I've had my 2018 11" iPad Pro for 3 years now and don't plan on upgrading for another 5 years. iPads last a really really long time.