Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I still don't understand what the point of this is. What will a curved smartphone do for you that flat one can't? Are there any benifits? Or is it just to look cool?
 
It's theoretically possible for me to put a coconut up my bottom, doesn't mean I should do it though.
 
Older CRTs were convex because that's the only way CRTs can emit photons (from a cylinder). A concave display could reduce glare because less of the surface is facing a light source. A convex display has more glare because more of the surface faces a light source.

No, they were convex because that's all the technology for making a glass tube allowed. Until it didn't, and Sony figured out how to make them only curved side-to-side, not top-to-bottom. What an improvement. Eventually we got CRTs with a totally flat face, which was, as others have said, a huge and wonderful improvement.

And a concave display will not reduce glare. It would concentrate it all in one place, making that one place impossible (instead of merely hard) to read.
 
Curvature won't reduce glare, it will increase glare. You might be too young to remember, but one of the benefits of going with flat screens was to reduce glare in monitors.

Monitors were also big, bulky, heavy, unportable boxes back then. They're still kind of unwieldy these days.

Watches, phones, even laptops are much more portable, so dealing with glare is much easier.
 
This is a technology that will be useful, but like 64-bit is more forward-looking. Once displays truly become flexible then they will be more useful. For now, curvature might help reduce glare. Anyway, we should probably wait to see what LG and Samsung actually produce before passing further judgment. The fact that both of them are in the game means that Apple has options if it wants to incorporate any similar designs next year or in the future.

----------



Potentially it could reduce glare if it is concave. Also, it could be a way of reducing the bezel size or increasing the usable area of a screen without increasing the physical size.

64bit is nothing but more throughput for data and system memory. Just like having 10 lane highway instead of a 4 way highway.
 
Apple should only use these if they genuinely make the product better.

I'm not surprised LG and Samsung are both gunning to be the first with curved displays; that's how those companies "design" their products. They pack them full of gimmicks (useful or not) to try and seem like there's some advanced technology there.

The thing that has always set Apple apart is that its designs make sense. They would only use these things if they really made for a better product. That's why I've always thought of Apple as an engineering-driven company (rather than a marketing-driven company like most others, although that's not to say that Apple will let their marketing be second-rate).

If that ever changes, and Apple make a curved iPhone that is just gimmicky and not more useful, then I'd start to worry about Apple's future. If they do that then they've lost the soul of the company.
 
What would the benefit be of having my display curved?

well that's just the thing isn't it, they'll have to come out with something to make it worth while, there are probably times in history we can look back and see people said "what would that be any good for?" and then turn around and they innovated something, and everyone wants one

but yeah, they gotta think of something first :rolleyes:
 
Curved is cool but what about fully bent? I think a wrap around phone that can fold out to tablet type thing would sell great. I remember last year at ces Samsung showed a video of something like that but not sure they even had a real prototype.
 
In the USA Today interview with Ive and Federighi Ive said that Apple decided to use multi touch in the iPhone before the iPad because they thought they could more easily demonstrate the value (i.e. most people has cell phones and didn't like them) with the iPhone. What is the value of a curved display for something other than a watch? Does it allow for a thinner device or more useful screen real estate without making the device bigger?
 
Mine bends to the left.

This is the epitome of targeted advertising:

ScreenShot2013-10-07at54212PM_zps6ffa9c6c.png
 
curved?

Im not sure why would you want a curved phone. It would be awkward in packets and add additional stress to the unit itself. Maybe on a watch, but other than that, I don't get it.
 
I'd love to see a paper thin OLED "newspaper" shown in "Minority Report"
 

Attachments

  • minority-report-epaper2.jpg
    minority-report-epaper2.jpg
    14.8 KB · Views: 724
  • minority-report-epaper1.jpg
    minority-report-epaper1.jpg
    15 KB · Views: 714
That was because the older CRT monitors all had a CONVEX surface, which indeed increased glare. Relative to a convex surface, a flat screen reduces glare. But the OP said if the surface could be made just slightly concave, it surely would further reduce the glare, which is very true physic that you totally missed.

Wouldn't a concave surface collect just as much glare as convex?

----------

I'd love to see a paper thin OLED "newspaper" shown in "Minority Report"

DuPont demonstrated them in 2001, definitely not too far off.
 
Im not sure why would you want a curved phone. It would be awkward in packets and add additional stress to the unit itself. Maybe on a watch, but other than that, I don't get it.

My leg is curved, if it matched the curve of my leg then it would actually be more comfortable and take up less space in my pocket.

I foresee more a very slight curve than anything extreme.

Though, if they made it very concave then I could also use it as a coffee mug, and that would be fantastic.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.