Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Curvature won't reduce glare, it will increase glare. You might be too young to remember, but one of the benefits of going with flat screens was to reduce glare in monitors.

Might have something to do with this sort of idea:

http://www.google.com/patents/US3402981

And the move to flatscreens was also to reduce irregularities in straight line reproduction on the screens themselves, increased definition and eco-efficiency, not just glare...
 
I think the obvious question is...

what are the uses of curved display so far? Yes, we have had curved display for a long time: printed and painted surfaces like paper and billboards.

Can you think of some examples of useful existing curved displays? Cylindrical books, painting? no.

Most billboards are flat.

How many curved watches have you seen?
 
This is hilarious, because when flatscreen LCDs came out, everyone breathed a sigh of relief because they wouldn't have to deal with the curved screens of CRT monitors that distorted shapes and couldn't be hung on a wall.

Now, everyone wants curved screens again. Oh, the irony.

Change for the sake of change is not progress. Change is easy... improvement is much harder.


I guess some people have trouble thinking outside the box...

:rolleyes:
 
Wouldn't a concave surface collect just as much glare as convex?


This diagram clearly shows how it's less. Just look at the formula; it's super simple.
 

Attachments

  • 800px-Spherical_mirror.png
    800px-Spherical_mirror.png
    73.3 KB · Views: 109
64bit is nothing but more throughput for data and system memory. Just like having 10 lane highway instead of a 4 way highway.

Hence it is more forward looking right now than a major new benefit in itself. However, in the case of the A7, the change in architecture does bring immediate benefits to recompiled applications.
 
Curve

Not iPhone. It's more likely Apple will used a curved display in its iWatch.
 
I'm going to go ahead and guess that Samsung and LG are going to come out with phones using a curved display and expect that people will buy them simply because hey, curved screen!

I'm also going to guess that Apple will only come out with a curved screen when it can come up with a form factor where it's clearly better to use a curved screen.

My bet is on the form factor that was revealed in one of their patents for a "snap bracelet" style watch. If Apple's a engineering team can pull it off, it would be VERY cool (and more importantly, USEFUL) to have a device slightly smaller or narrower than an iPhone that is capable of curving around your wrist while wearing it, but that you can open and lay flat.
 
I really don't see any benefit of these curved displays? what the point really? just a gimmick samsung and lg like.never liked these two companies.
 
Older CRTs were convex because that's the only way CRTs can emit photons (from a cylinder). A concave display could reduce glare because less of the surface is facing a light source. A convex display has more glare because more of the surface faces a light source.

We all know why old CRT's were curved. Your explanation is weird, and wrong. But you apparently don't know about the first flat display, which was a Zenith CRT monitor. The benefits were immediately obvious.

The reason why old CRT's were convex, and by the way they weren't like a portion of a tube, that came later with some Sony displays, was because the electron beam spreads as it moves to the edge of the display. It turns into an eclipse. Until electronics were able to keep the beam shape round, they had to have the front of the screen shaped like a portion of a sphere, but flatter. Zenith was able to correct the beam distortion, and so could use a flat tube. Sony's screens, which came earlier than the zenith, used screens that were straight vertically, but still curved horizontally, because it was easier, as the beam had further to travel to the edge lengthwise than height wise.

Now, as for your concave idea, well, it's terrible. A concave surface will collect glare from every angle. It will be far worse.

And so there you have it.

----------

That was because the older CRT monitors all had a CONVEX surface, which indeed increased glare. Relative to a convex surface, a flat screen reduces glare. But the OP said if the surface could be made just slightly concave, it surely would further reduce the glare, which is very true physic that you totally missed.

No. Making the screen concave will increase glare significantly. If you ever get hold of a magnifying mirror, used for makeup, you will see that it collects light. It's shaped like a telescope mirror. You really don't want a screen shaped like that.

I only minored in physics and had just one year of optics, so I suppose I could be wrong, but I highly doubt it.
 
What would the benefit be of having my display curved?

Well... there must be some value? From what I understand... here's how this all came about.

  • Someone at Xerox Parc originally started looking at flexible and curved screens.
  • Apple thought it sounded useful and filed some patents.
  • Microsoft was skeptical and thought CRT's might come back.
  • Samsung heard it's "the next big thing" and started their own research while closely monitoring the market for any new developments.
  • and last, LG figured how could everyone else be wrong and are doing their own... but they are cutting a few corners and using plexiglass instead of flexible glass.

Meanwhile, we all wait with baited breath to figure out what the benefit will be for us of curved displays? Maybe so when you spill your coffee if rolls off your phone faster????
 
You may not want a curved iPad but a flexible screen means a screen that will not shatter if dropped, pretty much for the same reason a pair of socks don't shatter when you drop them or place a heavy object on them. The iPad/iPhone screens would be very damage resistant.

Next they can work on coatings that make Apple product more water proof.

I tested your sock theory with a flat piece of cloth. Dropped a towel off my roof...it didn't shatter. I hit it with a hammer...damned if it isn't still fine. I even ran over it with my car...same results. Turns out most cloth is quite resilient. Cloth is in a way waterproof tho...toss it in the dryer and it works like new, well, minus a little fuzz.
 
Monitors were also big, bulky, heavy, unportable boxes back then. They're still kind of unwieldy these days.

Watches, phones, even laptops are much more portable, so dealing with glare is much easier.

As I said, for watches, many of which have curved faces, it's fine. But why would you want a product where you had to "deal" with a problem that didn't need to be as serious in the first place? I don't. I don't want to have to turn my device at different angles to avoid glare that shouldn't be there in the first place. And it's MUCH harder to avoid glare on a curved screen, because the glare follows you around as you move your head, or the screen itself. Outside, it will be even worse.

And that's not counting all the image distortion you will get from the curves.

----------

This diagram clearly shows how it's less. Just look at the formula; it's super simple.

Actually, that formular doesn't work the way you think for a surface that is collecting light from all surfaces. While it appears to disperse light, it also makes a strong glare spot in the middle that follows your head around as you move.
 
?

What would curved glass do for anyone?

I don't get it. Please give me one reason...just one reason why it might be good to have a curved screen.
 
Something like a watch makes sense for these, but I absolutely hate it for TVs and phones. The geometric distortion effect that it gives makes me want to just shut the thing off. It screams "gimmick" in those cases.

I can see it as "doubling" or extending your screen real estate on your phone. Think about it, part of your display (top half?) wraps around the phone so you can display time and weather or notifications on the back of your phone while you utilize the front display for other tasks. You can use liquid metal to hold it all together as the frame. Now dropping it, well that's another issue. What about a "flip phone" where you can have large screens, but they neatly tuck away when not needed as you fold the phone. When unfolded it creates a unified large touch screen.
 
While it makes sense for VERY large tv screens, so that people sitting at the far edges, can see a better picture!

If you were at a far edge of the couch, you might have a better time seeing the far edge of a curved TV, but you'd also have a harder time seeing the closer edge of a curved TV, as you'd be more on-edge to it.
 
I don't get the hype over curved displays. They seem rather novelty. I couldn't see myself using one.

I think it is attractive for people in the field that need information that is potentially changing at a glance. Imagine a soldier in the field that has a map of all of his ally's and known enemy locations constantly updating on his forearm. It could also be useful for firemen so they can keep track of where each man is located in a burning building.

As far as wearables go, it's really just a way to a large display to fit comfortably.
 
I don't think curved screens are going to be revolutionary because they are curved per se. That's really not interesting and offers little utility over flat screens (besides mildly extending screen real estate).

I think the true revolution may be (If it's actually true) that curved screens, used flatly, are much more resilient to shattering. A shatter-proof glass phone screen would be truly revolutionary.
 
Doesn't seem useful on a phone unless there's going to be a flip smartphone. Would be useful on a watch or something.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.