Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Custom Built 21.5-inch iMac with Intel Core i9 Outperforms 24-inch M1 iMac in Tests
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
So, replacing parts with more modern varieties and expanding memory makes a system more powerful?
Ffs, I wish I’d known this years ago, the money I could have saved on replacing computers is insane.
And that money’s hard to come by you know. Have you any idea how many trips to the sperm bank I need to make to buy an Apple computer? I can barely walk by the end of the week.
Ahem, anyway, actually a pretty cool wee project. It’s nice to see what could have been, if Apple actually gave the small iMac some Intel love.
The power draw and can action compared to the M1 though, I dread to think.
Ffs, I wish I’d known this years ago, the money I could have saved on replacing computers is insane.
And that money’s hard to come by you know. Have you any idea how many trips to the sperm bank I need to make to buy an Apple computer? I can barely walk by the end of the week.
Ahem, anyway, actually a pretty cool wee project. It’s nice to see what could have been, if Apple actually gave the small iMac some Intel love.
The power draw and can action compared to the M1 though, I dread to think.
This comparison 🤣
$400 65W High-end Intel CPU barely beats Apple's Low-end CPU.
$400 65W High-end Intel CPU barely beats Apple's Low-end CPU.
If i swap out my 1L 3 cylinder engine in my new(ish) car, for a 4L Turbo charged engine, that too will go faster.
However the cost, time, effort and practicality means I probably won't do it
However the cost, time, effort and practicality means I probably won't do it
I couldn't say exactly. I do know that a lower CPU spec 4K HP all in one. That looks like it was designed by Sharper Image in the 90's. Costs about $1,700. To be fair it has an OK GPU. Certainly better than the iMac 21.5 and a bit better than the M1.
All the differences in specs, custom parts and lower DPI panel. I'd put the HP and M1 iMac at about the same user value. The HP costs a lot more.
HP ENVY All-in-One - 32-a1035
Free shipping. Buy direct from HP. See customer reviews and comparisons for HP ENVY All-in-One - 32-a1035. Upgrades and savings on select products.
The 16GB/1TB is $2099, not 2x more, which would be $2598. Fact remains, buy it or don’t, this is how Apple sells it.
Hardly absurd. A huge number of Apple customers, who need an entry level computer for just email, browsing the internet with Safari, and lightweight spreadsheeting with Numbers will do just fine with entry level storage and memory on a new iMac. $1,250 is a great price for that configuration and performance level - Apple will sell loads of them at that price
Have requirements that need more storage/memory? Simply pay for it. Easy.
Apples consumers have to be pretty ignorant, it's the only explanation as to why Apple can continue to get away with ripping them off.
Isn’t the 21.9” Intel iMac display 1080? Where as the M1 iMac is 4.5k. Driving a display does require some overhead. No?
Because the Apple chip uses so much less power that it's not even funny. Apple started with its lowest-end chip, it just happens to stand its ground against the competition on performance.
Ha, barely,? Did you see the numbers.
It cost the same as an M1.
So touchy! It's just a fun video that's all.
I wonder what the energy consumption of an M1 vs. a Core i9 CPU is. It's a little more tricky to measure on a desktop, where a laptop you can use battery consumption as a quick gauge.
Or... maybe it's your assessment about Apple's customers being "pretty ignorant." That's quite a sweeping generalization. And wrong.
Last edited:
Funny, I always thought that people valuating the product they want by the price difference to products they don’t want to be the ignorant ones.
How much money the manufacturer makes on the product I want has zero interest to me. You can easily have an inefficient low-margin product that is worse than a highly efficient high-margin product. Happens all the time. Try focusing on the value a product actually gives you instead, it’s actually quite liberating. I can get coffe for free, that doesn’t mean that the tea I would much rather drink is automatically expensive.
who gives a crap? so a custom-built computer "beats" an entry-level M1? really?
Poor Intel, they probably paid this guy. LOL, an i9 is Intel's top of the line CPU's (something never offered in the 21 inch iMac's). It's the 27 inch iMac's that offered top of the line CPU's if you wanted to pay for them. The CPU itself is horrendously expensive and its being compared to a CPU designed for low power usage in low end laptops and iPad's.
Not that it matters, but it should be compared to what comes in the 27 inch replacements - and if the past M1 benchmarks are any indication the i9 will get stomped in everything but hardware based edge cases (where the i9 has some special circutry for something that other processors don't), power usage and heat generation.
Not that it matters, but it should be compared to what comes in the 27 inch replacements - and if the past M1 benchmarks are any indication the i9 will get stomped in everything but hardware based edge cases (where the i9 has some special circutry for something that other processors don't), power usage and heat generation.
Nobody is ripping me off…I know exactly what I’m buying when I buy a Mac. Your lens is buying and building PCs. Fine. Enjoy it. But don’t act like your superior because you saved $5 on a RTX3070 so that Lara Croft’s t*** look more realistic at 144Hz, because no one here f***ing cares.
How are people missing the fact that the intel iMac had a dedicated GPU? Isn't that going to help a lot with the blender score? Plus, is it really fair to compare a 65W desktop CPU to one designed for an ultrabook? Even at load in a mac mini, the M1 maxes out under 40W.