It was 410 reviews when I left my review last night. MXC will be a memory soonCheck out the CurrentC app's comments sometime. One star, 1000 reviews, all angry (as far as I can tell). Seems like this issue is getting some traction at least...
It was 410 reviews when I left my review last night. MXC will be a memory soonCheck out the CurrentC app's comments sometime. One star, 1000 reviews, all angry (as far as I can tell). Seems like this issue is getting some traction at least...
I can tell you right now that people will use systems that offer discounts first and foremost, consumers are constantly on the look out for the best bargains, ask your wife's or girlfriends which system they would use, one because it has a fruit logo or one that can offer discounts.
So you hit the nail on the head here.
i think apple and google should remove the currentc app from their app stores. Game over!!!
lets get a regional or area managers phone number. They are not hard to get let tell him how we feelThey are all about trying to monetize your personal data
I already wrote to CVS telling them I am moving my families prescriptions to the Walgreens 2 blocks away and I don't have a 6 yet
Everyone want to get to you and analyze you. Apple pay just pays the $ which is obviously not enough
F em
I don't think a little "extra discounts" would be that attractive for an "average customer" to go through all the trouble. I mean paying is a habit. An average person don't change their entire habit for a small change in benefit.
MCX mobile payment system may perhaps turn out better and even have superior features when it debuts than Apple Pay - who knows?
But to disable a funding stream that is operational now (and as another said "from affluent customers who can afford to buy latest iPhone" ) has to be the commercial equivalent of shooting oneself in the foot.
Come on CVS and Rite Aid, let Apple Pay bring you big $$ until your possibly better MCX comes on line next year - then let the best (or both) mobile payment system(s) win.
My RX choice is now Walgreens.
Collusion is an agreement between two or more parties, sometimes illegal and therefore secretive, to limit open competition by deceiving, misleading, or defrauding others of their legal rights, or to obtain an objective forbidden by law typically by defrauding or gaining an unfair market advantage.
Of course it's a douchey move. It's an appropriately douchey response to a douchey manoeuvre by the company.
And they'll complain to their boss, and they'll complain to their boss, and so forth. This is how things get fixed - from the grassroots level. Enough people do it and there'll be an obvious monetary penalty to the company. Until they're negatively impacted, they won't give a crap about the customer.
It was 410 reviews when I left my review last night. MXC will be a memory soon
I think you're vastly overestimating communication in the chain of command in retail.
Folks,
In addition to sending your complaints to Rite-Aid and CVS corporate by email, you should email AskDOJ@usdoj.gov.
You should request an investigation into Merchant Customer Exchange (MCX) which describes itself as "the first merchant-owned mobile commerce network".
According to Wikipedia:
The part you guys are not taking into account is that MCX's system does not use Credit Cards. It is linked to your bank account and does an ACH draft to make the payment. In today's world, that simple fact will be all it takes to kill it off. How many people have the $$ for everything they want to buy? With all the media on hacking and the hacks into "the cloud" are people going to want to give the stores their banking account data to an unknown company and allow it to be stored in the cloud?
To me that sounds the same as PayPal, it links into your bank account and no one has an issue with it.
However I don't live in Maerica so don't fully know your systems, but I do know your very slow to adopt tech sometimes, like chip and pin.
As for the cloud, well as I said people use PayPal everyday without any problems, NFC has to prove itself still really but I don't think it be any less secure, although Apple will seriously need to never let their system be hacked or it will kill the trust in their brand.
Oh God, you guys are making a big deal out of nothing. Are you all that bored with your lives? Talk about first world problems. Go out to the park, spend time with some old friends or family members (not on FB) and chill out. Life is just too short for such silliness.
The part you guys are not taking into account is that MCX's system does not use Credit Cards. It is linked to your bank account and does an ACH draft to make the payment. In today's world, that simple fact will be all it takes to kill it off. How many people have the $$ for everything they want to buy? With all the media on hacking and the hacks into "the cloud" are people going to want to give the stores their banking account data to an unknown company and allow it to be stored in the cloud?
Somehow, I bet you support Apple's recent decisions to pull Bose and Fitbit devices from their stores because they compete with Apple's new products....
i'm not saying that some average joes aren't upset about this, and i'm sure SOME of them know what's going on. but what i'd bet we're witnessing is a massive circle jerk - people jumping from MR and other tech sites to the app page to leave horrible reviews. i almost guarantee that the average consumer is either unaware of the differences, or don't care. it's a pattern - lots of folks spewed vitriol at final cut pro when apple first bought it, but once those who were angry settled down and stopped leaving reviews, do you think the reviews there had any affect on people upgrading from iMovie, looking for a better editor? of course it didn't, it became one of the top apps even while it was an underperforming 'lemon' in the eyes of us who wouldn't stand for the 'downgrade' as we saw it.
people in these threads the last few days are overestimating the participatory nature of the general population of app users. which includes geriatrics and soccermoms who simply aren't privy to the modern world of tech and the negative effects it can have on their lives.
"ooh, look, i can pay at CVS with my phone by going into an app and pulling up one of those funky barcodes? how wonderful, what a world!"
Why don't people see the problem with 1.0 products? I'd be glad if my shop isn't accepting each new type just because a company throws something new onto the market. Even Apple products and software had issues, big issues. As a business I wouldn't want to 'test' new payment systems until I am assured they are save and reliable. People here moan as if NFC is the only way to pay.
Folks,
In addition to sending your complaints to Rite-Aid and CVS corporate by email, you should email AskDOJ@usdoj.gov.
You should request an investigation into Merchant Customer Exchange (MCX) which describes itself as "the first merchant-owned mobile commerce network".
According to Wikipedia:
MCX is co-owned by competing merchants with the objective of reducing the cost of transactions for all merchants. In an fair market economy banks and credit card service providers would have a fair chance of offering their services to each merchant individually. However, since these supposedly "competing" merchants are co-owners of MCX, they are acting in collusion to snuff out the banks and credit card providers (and in turn Apple Pay and Google Wallet).
It is one thing for Target to offer the "Red Card", but CurrentC is a cross-merchant "Red Card". It is one thing for Wal-Mart to have its own fleet of trucks, but if merchants got together to create a trucking service for common use in order to snuff out independent trucking services to reduce costs then they would be guilty of collusion.
Send an email to the DOJ and request an investigation of Merchant Customer Exchange (MCX). The actions of Rite-Aid and CVS (two competing entities) to actually incur costs to refuse a form of payment that they were already accepting in order to promote a yet unreleased mobile payment solution for which they are co-owners is highly suspicious and warrants an investigation into MCX. US citizens have the right to request an investigation from the DOJ to determine if indeed illegal anti-competitive practices are going on here.
An investigation will reveal if Rite-Aid and CVS were acting independently versus colluding. But the fact that they are co-owners in MCX and the fact that both reference "CurrentC" in their internal memos regarding deactivation of NFC payments, then it would seem that the proof of collusion is fairly strong with MCX acting as the intermediary enabling the collusion (in a much stronger way than Apple acted as intermediary for the publishers to fix eBook prices since MCX is an actual formal corporation owned by the merchants).