Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
And maybe declare a Jihad, or even do some drive-bys. Those bastards will get the message. Hey we're Apple People, we're Special. :mad:

Well, now you're just getting crazy. Lol. :rolleyes:

I'm just a software engineer and a big geek at heart. LOVE what apple is doing these days. :D

Nice to see a company that can push these things forward...

If you want to throw politics around, I've heard there's another forum for that. :rolleyes:
 
Time for a good old fashion boycott. I will leave my things at the register if places don't take apple pay.


[url=http://cdn.macrumors.com/im/macrumorsthreadlogodarkd.png]Image[/url]


Earlier this week, pharmacy chain Rite Aid shut down unofficial support for the Apple Pay and Google Wallet mobile payments systems, resulting in an outcry from users who have been testing out Apple's new system since its launch on Monday. Rite Aid was not an official Apple Pay partner, but the payments system generally works with existing near field communications (NFC) payment terminals anyway, and many users had had success using Apple Pay at Rite Aid stores early in the week.

It now appears that fellow major pharmacy chain CVS is following suit and as of today is shutting down the NFC functionality of its payment terminals entirely, a move presumably intended to thwart Apple Pay. Google Wallet services are obviously also being affected by the move.

Multiple reports on Twitter and the MacRumors forums have indicated that CVS has sent an email to its stores indicating that NFC support is to be turned off. It is still relatively early in the day in the U.S., but we are now starting to see reports of NFC indeed being turned off at CVS stores.

The reason behind Rite Aid's and CVS's moves to disable unofficial Apple Pay support in their stores is presumably related to their participation in Merchant Customer Exchange (MCX), a retailer group developing its own mobile payments system known as CurrentC. A claimed internal Rite Aid message shared with SlashGear supports this notion, instructing cashiers to explain to customers that Apple Pay is not supported but that MCX's solution will be available next year.

ImageRite Aid internal memo regarding Apple Pay
Rite Aid's and CVS's moves are also in stark contrast to competitor Walgreens, which has fully embraced Apple Pay and is one of Apple's launch partners for the service. With over 8,000 stores around the United States, Walgreens has been one of the most popular locations for those testing out Apple Pay over the first week of availability.

Article Link: CVS Stores Reportedly Disabling NFC to Shut Down Apple Pay and Google Wallet
 
You probably love Google also!!!

Well, not if you choose to still use your CVS card when paying with Apple Pay (if they accepted it as payment, that is). People choose to use the CVS card for the discounts. I use it even when I pay cash. I don't mind the store tracking my purchases -- that's how they deliver targeted coupons.

Some of us really appreciate Apple and their attempts to protect privacy in this new solution.
 
I will continue to shop where the lowest price is regardless of Apple Pay lol Its not like we are getting discounts on our purchases for using Apple Pay.... well at least not yet...:cool:
 
Lmao everyone on this topic is acting as if they are completely banning you from using traditional payments. Yes i agree its a dumb thing for CVS to do but are you guys really going to go all the way across town to a Walgreens just because CVS banned Apple pay? (NFC. I know) Sometimes i think most of you are working for Apple. Or Apple is paying you instead of the reality of you paying them. This will bite CVS in the butt and im sure they will be reintroducing NFC again because no one is going to download that app. But please calm down. It really isnt that big of a deal.

You clearly don't understand the issue. This is about draconian business practices, not about being able to buy something. Many of us care about how and where we spend our money. I don't give money to companies with whose policies I disagree. Judging by others here, many feel the same way and you are in the minority.
 
CVS executives aren't too bright. Receiving money from customers should be the highest priority, however that happens.
 
I find it ridiculous that people are so emotional about this that they will refuse to shop at CVS.

Are you that tied to your iPhone and it's brand new purchasing capabilities that now you can never ever shop at a place that doesn't support that payment.

Seriously?

Wow.

I'm not refusing to shop at CVS. I'm shopping at Walgreens, which is right across the street and offers the payment method I want to use.

You want me to shop at CVS? Seriously? Wow. How much are they paying you?
 
The credit card processing fees represents 2% or more of purchases, and retailers working with narrow profit margins obviously want to get more of that share for themselves.

Unfortunately for CVS and RiteAid, deliberately limiting consumer options to drive consumers to use your future system is just bad business. This is similar in many ways to DRM, where you want consumers to operate in your ecosystem. It's also similar to DRM in that consumers will actively avoid these limitations.

Even worse, these companies don't yet have an alternative. After using Apple Pay, it's easy to tell this is the best possible consumer experience, and retailers aren't going to be able to either hide the convenience of ApplePay or create an equally good system. (Technically, they probably could create an equally good system, but that would require putting the customer first, which is against their primary motivation to make more money.)

There's a lot of money at stake, so I understand why retailers want to build their own payment system. However, they're too late to the game. This will be an epic fight, and Apple (and probably Google in a year or so) will be the winner. Deliberately limiting customers is going to push people to other retailers and possibly to more online purchases.
 
I will continue to shop where the lowest price is regardless of Apple Pay lol Its not like we are getting discounts on our purchases for using Apple Pay.... well at least not yet...:cool:

You also get discounts from Walgreens with their reward card. I have it attached to my key chain and wave it in front of their bar code reader before payment. Always get a discount, plus points that add to even more discounts as the points accumulate. I save more money at Walgreen vs CVS.
 
I'm not refusing to shop at CVS. I'm shopping at Walgreens, which is right across the street and offers the payment method I want to use.

You want me to shop at CVS? Seriously? Wow. How much are they paying you?

Naturally I must be a shill because I find yours and other posters like you ridiculous for being so hot over the issue.
 
Bullies

Can you even imagine the board/strategy meetings over at Walgreens right now? Picture a bunch of stoic, older white guys in the mid-west running around doing high-fives and cartwheels all over the place.
Both of their main competitors have told their respective customers that they don't want their dirty money and to take it some place where the merchant will accept payments unconditionally.
Bullies are rarely known for their insight, thoughtfulness, and big-picture thinking.
 
I think a lot of this confusion over the assumption that merchants need to pay into ApplePay was with the fact they announced retail partners. In reality, these retail partnerships were likely just advertising or commitments to do a full NFC deployment where there may have been few or no NFC terminals installed in stores. Its been said over and over again that its the banks that pay a fee to Apple, but that fee comes out of a percentage already paid by merchants for payment processing. It didn't increase the fee for merchants, it just cuts into what banks get. The banks are more than happy to participate because if it means a massive reduction in fraud with little to no effort from them, then its a win win for all. Lets not forget part of this MCX group is Target, a company already show to be HORRIBLE at protecting its own system from attack through using even basic security practices. You would think, since fraud liability will be shifting to merchants and banks, that everyone would be on board with any payment method that made it impossible to steal CC info. Instead they want to make their own payment method using QR, which already has a pretty poor successful read rate from my own use on my phone. (The same day i tried out ApplePay for the first time I also tried to use passbook for my walgreens card. The IR reader wouldn't read the screen and the clerk said it'd been failing all week but NFC worked without a hitch when i ultimately paid). I assume with this QR method means you need to give businesses access to all your financial info which has already been proven to be a mistake with all this widespread hacking. Ultimately it may be on the banks to require NFC compatibility in their agreements or else they withdraw support for credit card payment.
 
Maturity will trump Apple fanboy hysteria.

So please enlighten us as to what you mean by "maturity". People like you are first to use the "fanboy" label because you can't argue the facts so you must resort to ad hominem attacks against others.

You are equating "maturity" to doing what you're told and not looking deeper into how we spend our money and with whom. It sounds to me like we are actually the mature ones because we give thought to who we support with our dollars. You don't. That's not maturity, my friend, that's immaturity.
 
What percentage of shoppers, at Rite Aid and CVS, actually carry iPhone 6s?

Soon none! As everyone keeps saying, Walgreens and cvs are typically right next to each other or down the street! I will be going to walgreens as well. I used to choose cvs, no more!
 
Maturity will trump Apple fanboy hysteria.

Yet, you post relentllessly here. Who has too much time on their hands and is hysterical? The use of "fanboy" and the time spent here proves without a doubt that you are one with too much emotions in the game.

Since Apple's market share is near 50%, 75% amongst the most affluent, in the US, whatever company pisses that many people off will suffer even if 10% of those people switch. When those people with money go elsewhere; it is CVS and Rite Aid which will become nervous and maybe even hysterical.
 
I think you're largely missing the point. The only way you can voice your displeasure with a merchant is by not giving them money. In doing so, you're reacting to an action by the merchant of which you do not approve, in this case CVS making the active decision to disable NFC. So, it is a perfectly valid response to cease shopping at the store to voice your displeasure with that decision. So it has nothing to do with how we may or may not have once paid CVS but rather the only meaningful way to voice disapproval of their decision to disable NFC.

This is absolutely spot on.
 
Oh please. A week ago you wouldn't have cared or even known the difference.

Not true at all. I've used contactless payment for years and I've known about MCX since it's beginning before it was named CurrentC, and I've been very opposed to its very existence since day 1 as I see it as extremely anti-consumer.
 
Maturity will trump Apple fanboy hysteria.

I don't see much hysteria, I see people who want a quick and secure payment system that doesn't track shopping data, and right now that's apple pay and google wallet. CVS and Rite Aide don't want me to pay that way, so I'll shop at Walgreens, where they do allow it. Where's the hysteria?

Park it already, would ya'. The iPhone 6 demographic can't even be found on a graph.

Actually... it's about 10% of the iPhone market already, that's pretty significant.
 
I think we all need to look beyond this individual battle/issue and look at the much bigger fundamental war that's about to be waged.

This isn't about CVS not liking Apple Pay or iPhone 6 users. Frankly, it's not even really about Apple at all.

The whole Merchant Customer Exchange initiative is about trying to cut the credit card companies and the hundreds of billions spent on transaction fees out of equation.

The thinking is that if they move to an MCX barcode system (via the CurrentC app) that's linked to your ACH bank card or store card number they save money on every transaction.

The advantage to them, in addition to saving billions in transaction fees is they get to harvest customer data on every sale. Similar to the 'reward card at the grocery store', Target, Best Buy Walmart, CVS and other members would be able to gather (and potentially share) data on all of their customers.

They will likely link some sort of discount/rewards program to it. It may be individual item discounts like grocery stores. It could be a flat discount (3% of purchases) or even a cash back program. Remember, they are going to save potentially billions on transaction fees..so giving some of that money back is a smart investment to encourage use.

The big battle that's going to be waged will be on privacy/security. I expect Visa/MC/Discover/AMEX and now Apple to team up on the front of EMV and Apple Pay solutions allow for anonymous transactions and are more secure than CurrentC. They'll especially play up the idea that your personal buying habits are being stored, shared and shopped. They'll also push the risk of potential exposure of your personal bank account info and question what fraud liability is in place. When debit cards first hit the scene, people were very wary about it being directly tied to their checking account. Limiting fraud liability helped people get over that hurdle.

As a customer I have mixed feelings. We all pay a higher cost for goods/services to mushroomed use of cc/debit cards. But I question how much savings we'd really see under an alternate system and question the privacy/security protocols that would be put in place.

By far the best post in this thread. All the shortsighted people that are happy to see NFC die because Apple has decided to use it are missing the point. What merchants are proposing as a substitute for NFC and the current mobile payment systems is far worse for consumers. The fact that people are overlooking this is mind boggling. The success of NFC doesn't just benefit Apple and iPhone users. It benefits Google, Google Wallet users, but most importantly- anyone who wants increased security and convenience at the checkout counter.

Further contributing to my disappointment in this thread is the people that think being jerks to cashiers is going to change anything. But I've beat the dead horse a little too much on that, so I'll stop.
 
Naturally I must be a shill because I find yours and other posters like you ridiculous for being so hot over the issue.

The issue here is that apple pay is more resilient to hackers. Plain and simple. This reason alone warrants to favor apple pay over plain old credit cards. Very reasonable to want to use the most secure form of pay.
 
I find it ridiculous that people are so emotional about this that they will refuse to shop at CVS.

Are you that tied to your iPhone and it's brand new purchasing capabilities that now you can never ever shop at a place that doesn't support that payment.

Seriously?

Wow.

Another one being willfully obtuse. CVS disabled NFC. Its not just Pay affected but people who use Google Wallet with their Android phone. And there is zero evidence that CVS is doing this to make the experience better for consumers. They just want to shut out Apple and Google. I can just as easily shop at Walgreens so that's what I will do.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.