Google Maps with TFFBox is a bit slow but still offers all features of Maps (including StreetView) on my PBG4 1.5GHz. That is one of the occasions I prefer TFF over webkit/Safari.I've finally had to abandon PPC for internet - Flickr and Google Maps (Street View) were the nails in the coffin on all but my Quad (which has been too uncomfortable to use in the heat this Summer).
Waiting for something to come along at the right price, I grabbed a near unused 20" Core Duo iMac for £70. Running Snow Leopard it's a no hassle web browsing machine but music, graphics, video editing and tinkering are still fully in PPC territory.
Another program I use to block ads (usually in Leopard-Webkit) is GlimmerBlocker. Just remember to add the pgl.yoyo list offered on their website, and you'll be good.Thats actually a really great idea, i might try that when I get my G5 going again...
I just spent 3 months using a 1.67 PowerBook as my daily driver.
The hacks were all found on here. I honestly don't remember specifics. I already did an SD to IDE adapter for the hard drive. I'm basically running a 128 gig ssd. I use iWork for basically everything now.Hi, could you tell more about the tricks you did with webkit and yt-video?
I guess an mSATA would make your Office2008 experience much better. I prefer to use Office2004 over 2008 since it's much snappier and I therefore (and for the sake of Office2000 on Win2Kpro/WinXPpro/Win7pro) keep all my stuff at Office97-04-level.
Here's a video about booting times (first boot of each program on a freshly rebooted 12" PB-G4 1.5GHz with Leopard):
1) Word'08 2) Word'04 3) Excel'08 4) Excel'04 5) LibreOffice 6)TextEdit
It's much faster than the latest Office on my MacBook2008 with ElCapitan.
To catch any idea Word'04/'08 are fast enough but I always use some text-oriented stuff like TextEdit, which beats them all...
Oh, if you already use an SSD somethings seems to be wrong with your 1.67GB PB settings.The hacks were all found on here. I honestly don't remember specifics. I already did an SD to IDE adapter for the hard drive. I'm basically running a 128 gig ssd. I use iWork for basically everything now.
I'm still interested about the menu-bar to preset yt-video output.
For web browsing I've noticed a significant difference between a dual core and a single core PowerMac G5. I've have a single processor 1.8GHz (PCI version) which I've used to browse the web for several years. It is common for it to beach ball and on occasion become unresponsive (the browser, the rest of the system is still responsive) while it chews through JavaScript code.Last time I used my PPC for daily browsing was like 2013, tbh a powermac g5 works better editing 1080p video than it does browsing the resource heavy internet these days. And its really only a software problem, sigh
For web browsing I've noticed a significant difference between a dual core and a single core PowerMac G5. I've have a single processor 1.8GHz (PCI version) which I've used to browse the web for several years. It is common for it to beach ball and on occasion become unresponsive (the browser, the rest of the system is still responsive) while it chews through JavaScript code.
Switching to a dual core system, even the first generation 2.0GHz model, provides a much more pleasant browsing experience. Beach balling and an unresponsive browser are significantly reduced and it feels more like using a modern system.
Kind of sad that web browsing, of all things, is what impacts these systems the most.
Yep. If I have activity monitor running the single CPU is pegged at 100% almost the entire time. The same on a dual processor system shows high, but not 100%, CPU utilization on both processors. Sadly I think most of that is advertising which is why ad blockers can improve performance.It's almost like one core takes are of all the crap a website flings and the other one is working to have the main course of the site come up, isn't it?
![]()
I'm hoping you meant SSD as in mSATA SSD and not an actual SD card...The hacks were all found on here. I honestly don't remember specifics. I already did an SD to IDE adapter for the hard drive. I'm basically running a 128 gig ssd. I use iWork for basically everything now.
I'm hoping you meant SSD as in mSATA SSD and not an actual SD card...
SD Cards aren't designed for sustained reads and writes. It will probably go bad on you much faster than an mSATA drive wouldI meant exactly what I said.
SD Cards aren't designed for sustained reads and writes. It will probably go bad on you much faster than an mSATA drive would
I do my taxes on PowerPC every year.Well, I can tell you one thing, I still can pay my taxes using TFF on my PPC G4 Quicksilver with no problems![]()
Wealth redistribution is grand. I sure am glad PPC's are cheap.
I just spent 3 months using a 1.67 PowerBook as my daily driver.
PS: I'm not posting this to hear what I can do differently. I like my PB exactly the way it is.
PPS: I have a dog that loves to tear blinds.
SD cards are way slower than an actual SSD and will not sustain the increased Reads\Writes from a computer. Although they have extremely fast access times, the read and write speeds will be mediocre at best, and may be only a bit faster then a healthy HDD. In most cases a standard SD Card is slower than a Hard DrivePerhaps. But for now, I am having no troubles and lightning fast read/write speeds. I'll take my chances for now, probably replace it later. Thanks for the heads up though.
Maybe it's a CF card or something? I have seen people install OS X on an SD card, but it was for testing macs onlySD cards are way slower than an actual SSD and will not sustain the increased Reads\Writes from a computer. Although they have extremely fast access times, the read and write speeds will be mediocre at best, and may be only a bit faster then a healthy HDD. In most cases a standard SD Card is slower than a Hard Drive
I have an IDE to CF adapter installed in one of the Power Mac G4s. It's an interesting beast, and a nice alternative to a mechanical hard drive. Tiger boots up a little faster on the CF card compared to an actual hard drive.Maybe it's a CF card or something? I have seen people install OS X on an SD card, but it was for testing macs only
I believe him that its a SD card, but I dont understand why thats the option he chose. Like it works for him, but an mSata ssd makes way more sense to meMaybe it's a CF card or something? I have seen people install OS X on an SD card, but it was for testing macs only