Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Can’t wait for other brands to start making proprietary stuff again. Wireless headphones which only work perfect with Google phones. Speakers you can only use with Samsung. LG only cables. This is proprietary hell. And this HomePod is the embodiment of anti consumer choice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: twistedpixel8
I don't see the appeal of these smart speakers.

But this is not just a smart speaker, it’s more than that, it’s a music player first. That’s what Apple has been emphasizing since the release of the HomePod. If you want a smart speaker, there are other options available. The HomePod is a smart speaker second and A music player first.
 
Awesome...!!

Although its not yet available in India...but I managed to get 1 from eBay at a reasonable price.

Will be getting my hands on it in a day or two
 
Can’t wait for other brands to start making proprietary stuff again. Wireless headphones which only work perfect with Google phones. Speakers you can only use with Samsung. LG only cables. This is proprietary hell. And this HomePod is the embodiment of anti consumer choice.

Completely agree. Same with "smart" stuff. I'm so tired of having fifty different "smart" protocols in my house. If they could all just agree on one, smart standard that everything used and the competition between companies would be who uses/integrates that standard best and offers additional functionality on top of it.

It's utterly ridiculous that I need Siri, Google Assistant and Alexa just to control all the stuff I have. Oh sorry, Nest only works with Alexa, Siri can control the blinds but not the lights because they aren't HomeKit so you need Alexa or Google Assistant, etc.

Are they trying to frustrate consumers to the point that we don't want these things in our homes anymore?
[doublepost=1519733027][/doublepost]
But this is not just a smart speaker, it’s more than that

It's literally a smart speaker. Apple has specifically designed it to be a HomeKit hub.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Onexy
Completely agree. Same with "smart" stuff. I'm so tired of having fifty different "smart" protocols in my house. If they could all just agree on one, smart standard that everything used and the competition between companies would be who uses/integrates that standard best and offers additional functionality on top of it.

It's utterly ridiculous that I need Siri, Google Assistant and Alexa just to control all the stuff I have. Oh sorry, Nest only works with Alexa, Siri can control the blinds but not the lights because they aren't HomeKit so you need Alexa or Google Assistant, etc.

Are they trying to frustrate consumers to the point that we don't want these things in our homes anymore?
[doublepost=1519733027][/doublepost]

It's literally a smart speaker. Apple has specifically designed it to be a HomeKit hub.
They should at least offer a uniform api through local network and possibly internet, even that isn’t present. Honestly for a company like Apple who is so horny about environmental protection... they are building a surprisingly rich ecosystem of things to throw away after switching the platform.
 
  • Like
Reactions: twistedpixel8
"I'm super excited to pre order my brand new smart speaker." -said no one ever
I actually did say that when they announced the product. Picked it up day one and I'm in love with the sound quality for the price. As soon as AirPlay 2 is up and running, I'm buying a second one with no hesitation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tubular
If you're in Apple's ecosystem, subscribe to Apple Music, and love listening to music in your home, the HomePod is a no brainer. We got one for the living room and for our bedroom upstairs. The sound quality is incredible. But what I like best about the speaker is that we are listening to a lot of music now in our house. Before, we had to connect the phone to a bluetooth speaker (a Bose soundlink — which is great!). Now I just tell Siri to play some music. My wife and I have found a lot of new music that we really like. And we like the idea of our newborn son hearing a lot of music throughout the house. The HomePod has been a huge hit in our household.

We don't really use a ton of the other smart features. We've set timers with it, asked about the weather, but we turn off personal stuff. Maybe we'll turn it on when it can handle multiple accounts. If I want to add a reminder, I can use my Watch or iPhone. The HomePod is all about music.
 
So why was this even posted on MR?
I have to ask the same question. Some 3rd party research group tracked some sales from some unknown retailers (but not Apple), and this is supposed to be an indicator of how well the HomePod sold on day one (like day 1 is some sort of barometer of overall sales itself). But hey, I guess if they make it sound like the Homepod sold like hotcakes (Happy National Pancake Day in the US, btw!), they think people will rush out to buy one?
 
How difficult is it to press play on your music player?? I don't see the appeal of these smart speakers.
Not very difficult, but the convenience is really nice, especially when sitting on the couch and holding a baby. If my hands are free, I can play and pause from my iPhone.
 
I actually did say that when they announced the product. Picked it up day one and I'm in love with the sound quality for the price. As soon as AirPlay 2 is up and running, I'm buying a second one with no hesitation.

"For the price", it better give you eargasms. :)

My $80 (on sale) HK Onyx Studio 2 BT speaker has TONS of bass, is powerful, and sounds fantastic. It's not smart, but when I want to listen to music, I prefer to use my iPhone to browse and control what I listen to. It takes mere seconds and I save $270.
[doublepost=1519738851][/doublepost]
Only regret i have is that i didn't bring 2 when i was in London.
Was the London Apple Store sold out? ;)
 
This to me is like the android vs iOS battle again. Amazon will get the market share, Apple will get the profits, and the losers are the hardware OEMs caught in the middle with all margins sucked dry.
 
Since people decided not to read the article, it sold better than every pre-order speakers besides the Echo Dot, which isn't surprising because the Dot is so cheap.

HomePod is already doing better than many here thought.
You cant discount the Echo Dot because it's cheap; if people want cheap then that's where they will go. This decreases Apple's market share because they don't have an answer for the Echo Dot.

it's like saying "Home Pod is the best selling speaker that costs $349.99, didn't include any above or below that price point though"
 
You cant discount the Echo Dot because it's cheap; if people want cheap then that's where they will go. This decreases Apple's market share because they don't have an answer for the Echo Dot.

it's like saying "Home Pod is the best selling speaker that costs $349.99, didn't include any above or below that price point though"
I'm not discounting it, but they are different products. The HomePod isn't really in the same category as the Dot.

I can use my phone or iPad as a Dot because it's essentially an assistant interface. And don't say Alexa is so much better than Siri because whether or not that's true, not really the point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WatchFromAfar
"For the price", it better give you eargasms. :)

My $80 (on sale) HK Onyx Studio 2 BT speaker has TONS of bass, is powerful, and sounds fantastic. It's not smart, but when I want to listen to music, I prefer to use my iPhone to browse and control what I listen to. It takes mere seconds and I save $270.

It does. I would honestly buy the HomePod even if it weren't smart. In fact I usually end up controlling it with my iPhone anyway, since I'm on my phone so much. I've never heard that particular Harman Kardon model, but looking at the specs/design I can guarantee you I would still prefer the HomePod despite the price. If you're happy with your setup, that's great. I won't knock it. Maybe the HomePod isn't for you. However, I will tell you some of why I love it so much.

1. The omni-directional tweeter array is simply beautiful. It allows a couple things that most other single-unit speakers can't match. First, you can walk around the room and always feel like the speaker is pointed directly at you. There is never a loss of clarity until you actually go into another room. This was very important to me since I have it set up in a wide open living room space with 4 different points of entry. Second, the ambient beamforming is legit. It will bounce background vocals and other non-central sounds to the sides and off the walls in a way that really opens up the music. It's not tacky, either, like some of the virtual surround sound effects I've heard before (which usually just blast extra treble upward and to the sides). I can actually hear the HomePod picking out different timbres and separating them, which is crazy. There is always near-perfect clarity with absolutely no harshness or sibilance.

2. The bass is also sublime. In fact its response range goes 15Hz lower than the Onyx (which makes sense given the larger woofer and greater excursion). The automatic bass correction is great too, because you can listen at full volume without distortion, but also because you can listen at low volumes without losing too much bass to the background noise of the environment.

3. The packaging scores very high on the WAF scale. It has a small footprint, a subtle mesh/fabric wrap, zero visible branding, and isn't very tall either. The siri/volume lights tastefully adjust to the ambient lighting. As I said, this is in our living room on an end table, and my wife is especially picky about how things look in this room. We don't have a TV there, and it has become a kind of serene sanctuary in our house where we like to read, chat, sip drinks, etc. However, we still wanted to be able to fire up some music for studying, parties, or whatever.

I could go on with a few more reasons, but suffice it to say, I think it's well worth the price. YMMV based on savings goals and what not.
 
As MKBHD said: they should have just left siri out of this and added a bunch of analog ports instead. Siri is a joke compared to the other smart assistants out there and HomePod’s version of Siri is even worse.

Apple needs to realize that they can’t just keep pumping out half-assed ***** at a premium price anymore. People are starting to notice that the “magic” is wearing thin.

Yeah the speakers sound really good, and props to the audio team for that but that’s where the praise ends.
[doublepost=1519722210][/doublepost]

As a speaker, the consensus is that it’s killer. The speakers have been tuned to absolute perfection (for a device of its size) and the mic array are awesome. So that’s hardware. How about software? TERRIBLE. Siri needs a complete overhaul because it doesn’t fit in with the others anymore. It needs features that feel like they’re pushing the boundaries of what smart assistants can do. That’s what Apple used to be able to do but they seem to have lost their way.
You seem to be fogetting that Apple intended to build a “breakthrough speaker first” with the HomePod. Watching its Keynote presentation, it was pretty clear to me (and others here, I’m sure) that the HomePod’s selling point is not Siri but its sound quality. People’s expectations, especially from an Apple tech follower like you, should be adjusted accordingly.

I knew months before its actual release that Siri won’t have a make-over in time for the HomePod’s release so I adjusted my expectations and based my purchase decision on it accordingly.

And what about ports?, you say...well, admit it, we’re now living in a wireless world. If you want ports on a speaker, the Homepod is definitely not for you. Apple is passionate in eliminating as many ports it can from all of their devices.

Watch this video from June 2017 (below) and check Tim out on the very first part...no need to watch the whole thing. Just listen to his answer to the first question. Watching it further (on the second question), it is clear Tim was not in the position to boast about Siri but manages to establish that it is good enough for the HomePod at this point in time and that they’re working to improve it.

 
Last edited:
Just shows you how many bright an amazing loving followers they have. :|

As opposed to the post I quoted, where -- despite it being way too soon and in spite of all evidence of a great start -- the HomePod is deemed a flop? OK, then... :rolleyes:
 
You seem to be fogetting that Apple intended to build a “breakthrough speaker first” with the HompePod. Watching its Keynote presentation, it was pretty clear to me (and others here, I’m sure) that the HomePod’s selling point is not Siri but its sound quality. People’s expectations, especially from an Apple tech follower like you, should have known that.

I knew months before its actual release that Siri won’t have a make-over in time for the HomePod’s release so I adjusted my expectations and based my purchase decision on it accordingly.

Watch this video from June 2017 (below) and check Tim out on the very first part...no need to watch the whole thing. Just listen to his answer to the first question. Watching it further (on the second question), it is clear Tim was not in the position to boast about Siri but manages to establish that it is good enough for the HomePod at this point in time and that they’re working to improve it.


So what? Many smart speakers have had great sound quality. What the HomePod is doing is not revolutionary, new or remarkable. Why does that excuse not having better software?
 
  • Like
Reactions: twistedpixel8
So what? Many smart speakers have had great sound quality. What the HomePod is doing is not revolutionary, new or remarkable. Why does that excuse not having better software?
Again, you have expectations based on what you want and what you think is the norm. Seems to me that you’re not getting what I’m saying.

And to reiterate, the HomePod’s sound is a marvel to experience...you should give it a try.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ErikGrim
Again, you have expectations based on what you want and what you think is the norm. Seems to me that you’re not getting what i’m saying.

Huh? So I shouldn't expect the speaker to have better software? I've heard the sound myself and it is indeed quite nice. Revolutionary? Nah.
 
The HomePod just like any other first generation product Apple has produced. All have had limitations that for some make the purchase unnecessary, while others a good fit. My latest experience, Apple Watch S0. More then met my needs, a good number of issues, a good purchase. Today Apple Watch S3, an ideal purchase. The HomePod current limitations make it poor choice for me. However, as noted, does not mean the future of this product could easily be an ideal product, exceeding my needs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ErikGrim
The HomePod just like any other first generation product Apple has produced. All have had limitations that for some make the purchase unnecessary, while others a good fit. My latest experience, Apple Watch S0. More then met my needs, a good number of issues, a good purchase. Today Apple Watch S3, an ideal purchase. The HomePod current limitations make it poor choice for me. However, as noted, does not mean the future of this product could easily be an ideal product, exceeding my needs.

Sorry. I'm guessing you're "expecting too much".

And I agree that it can definitely be improved and am looking forward to those enhancements.
 
"retina for your ears" Rene Ritchie........he must have had apple juice all over his face when he posted that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mi7chy
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.