For just using email, internet browsing,... the MP does seem like a waste of money, when another lower cost Mac would work just fine. Those that have come from PC's, are used to having the ability to upgrade inidividual components quite easily though, and that's hard to give up.Of course. I do a few Architectural Renderings on the side and if I did more, I could certainly justify plunking down the cash for a high-end workstation. Sure, there are uses in the home that justify a machine like this, but we aren't necessarily "home users" in the marketing sense of the word, which is what I was alluding to. In the end it comes down to this. If you need a machine like this or the Mac Pro, you already know you need it, marketing isn't going to tell you that.
In general, the term "home users" is sort of ambiguous. So many possible definitions, and each individual likely has thier own. I've not seen anything that the majority of users would agree upon as a "home user" at any rate, and it makes things a bit confusing.
Hopefully, each individual examines their own situation, and makes a sound decision
Unfortunately, it seems Apple hasn't any interest beyond Boot Camp & implementing BIOS emulation (firmware) in providing any support for Windows use. They haven't created any drivers for their RAID cards for windows. Using this as a guide, it wouldn't surprise me that they applied the same logic to the professional graphics situation. They examined it from an OS X only POV, and it didn't pan out financially to continue providing such a card.True, but much of the software that would take advantage of that is windows-only. It has always been prohibitively expensive for many on the Mac Pro, but at least it's been an option for those who needed it. And with bootcamp, you could use the windows drivers which would take advantage of it. So even if the Mac doesn't take advantage of it, it would be nice for it to be there anyway. It's a shame that the most powerful Mac doesn't offer this as an option. The Dell even offers dual cards.