Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
And I have had the same. But I have family members and friends who have experienced discrimination. From the looks of the interviewer who is shocked because the name and speech of the person during a phone interview doesn't "match" the person they just met.

Or the blatant idiotic reasoning that they got their jobs because of AA...:rolleyes:

But weird and inexplicable things happen to all people nearly all the time. It's a problem if you are insecure about some characteristic or trait and rely on it as a reason to explain ambiguous situations. For example, one person might think it's their skin color, another their weight, or their voice, popularity, height, hobbies, education, age, marital status, acne...
 
Hire people based off how well they can do the job. Ignore anything that has to do with them in anyother way. Anything else is prejudice regardless if you're hiring black, white, hispanic, male, female and so on. You're still going out of your way to hire a person based off what they are and look like. If you are trusty free of prejudice it wouldn't make a difference in any way with exception to the the persons skill.
Good idea. And this is the person whose job it is to make sure that policy is implemented among all the various people with hiring authority.
 
I'd question what your reaction would be if she was actually hired because she was better than everybody else at the role, and her skin colour was incidental.
But that's not true, is it? She is a D&I employee first and foremost. What skills are relevant to that "role" anyway?
 
  • Like
Reactions: haunebu
That's how it should work. That's not how it does work.

Pretending that everything is okay is just an excuse to avoid working to make things better. At best, it's lazy. At worst, it's complicit bigotry.

If you're in a minority group then you can still get a top job, sure, but it will (on average) be more difficult for you than for someone who isn't. That's not right, and needs to change. Change requires active work, and it's a slow, long-term thing.
Completely disagree with you. Minorities have just as much opportunity (if not more, these days) as anyone else. The problem is, it's easier to play the victim than to work hard. That's the saddest part, and probably the biggest problem.
 
But that's not true, is it? She is a D&I employee first and foremost. What skills are relevant to that "role" anyway?

Proven success at bringing a diverse workforce together. My company used to be plagued by ageism and our D&I VP cleaned it up within a year. It's actually made me a believer in the importance of D&I as the teams now work more efficiently than ever. But as I said before, I don't suspect there are many issued with D&I at Apple. Although I could be incorrect as I don't work there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mactendo
Completely disagree with you. Minorities have just as much opportunity (if not more, these days) as anyone else. The problem is, it's easier to play the victim than to work hard. That's the saddest part, and probably the biggest problem.
You are right. Part of people just work hard and reach their goals, but even bigger part is just playing victim with all the nonsense like white privilege and so on.
 
The past affects the present, and while some see this as political correctness, PR nonsense or whatever, I think doing things like this today will make such beliefs more true in the future.

40, 50, 60 years ago and beyond, this country was a lot different, and the effects are still felt today, which is why things like diversity efforts are even needed in the first place. But, by taking such action, it will make arguments like mine harder to defend in the upcoming decades, which is a good thing.

You are right. Part of people just work hard and reach their goals, but even bigger part is just playing victim with all the nonsense like white privilege and so on.


You have mentioned a shade of white and black, there are many shades of gray in the middle, which is what I believe diversity efforts are trying to target.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vilacr
New MR forum all-time low: criticizing inclusion putting it on the same level as I/O ports on computers.
I'm not criticizing inclusion. What I'm criticizing is the fact that all too often "Inclusion" and "Diversity" are nothing more than code words for exclusion, quotas etc. How about Apple hires the best possible people it can REGARDLESS of what their skin color is, their sexual leanings are or what their gender is?
 
I would imagine that her department includes workplace policies that affect employees after they've been hired, too.

Where I work now, we're expected to reach a certain standard of dressing-up -- i.e., khakis are okay but shorts and T-shirts will get you the hairy eyeball -- but I don't think anyone would bother the African-American woman in the next cubicle about her long braids, or the Muslim woman at the help desk and her hijab, or my Indonesian colleague and his batik-colored shirt.

Getting hired is only one obstacle. Attitudes that are present during day-to-day operations, however, can become their own beast if they're not handled appropriately.

Denise has been grinding away at her job for 20 years? I had no idea. Good for her. Glad to see that she's made it as far up the chain as she has.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlexGraphicD
The past affects the present, and while some see this as political correctness, PR nonsense or whatever, I think doing things like this today will make such beliefs more true in the future.

40, 50, 60 years ago and beyond, this country was a lot different, and the effects are still felt today, which is why things like diversity efforts are even needed in the first place. But, by taking such action, it will make arguments like mine harder to defend in the upcoming decades, which is a good thing.




You have mentioned a shade of white and black, there are many shades of gray in the middle, which is what I believe diversity efforts are trying to target.
Why? You need best people for the job that's it. Nothing can be more simple.
[doublepost=1495561574][/doublepost]
I'm not criticizing inclusion. What I'm criticizing is the fact that all too often "Inclusion" and "Diversity" are nothing more than code words for exclusion, quotas etc. How about Apple hires the best possible people it can REGARDLESS of what their skin color is, their sexual leanings are or what their gender is?
Too easy, too logical. Must have drama.
 
Completely disagree with you. Minorities have just as much opportunity (if not more, these days) as anyone else. The problem is, it's easier to play the victim than to work hard. That's the saddest part, and probably the biggest problem.

I think you are both correct. There are people in society who choose to play the 'victim' card to avoid hard work and there are people who works hard but faces discrimination. These are society's issues and individuals make up the society. Unless everyone is on board, on the same page, have the same goals, we will always have these issues.

It's good that Apple recognizes this issue but this could very well be a PR / marketing move. I think most people have issues is with this role... how exactly will this role help solve our society's problem?
 
Completely disagree with you. Minorities have just as much opportunity (if not more, these days) as anyone else. The problem is, it's easier to play the victim than to work hard. That's the saddest part, and probably the biggest problem.
inequality? please not this again.
So you're basically just denying that there's a problem then.

In that case you're part of the reason why we still need roles like VP of D&I, and people like Denise. That's the great irony here — you hate these roles, you shout that it's "PC nonsense", but attitudes like yours are what makes these roles necessary and keeps them around.

Congratulations on feeding your own source of misery! :)
 
So you're basically just denying that there's a problem then.

In that case you're part of the reason why we still need roles like VP of D&I, and people like Denise. That's the great irony here — you hate these roles, you shout that it's "PC nonsense", but attitudes like yours are what makes these roles necessary and keeps them around.

Congratulations on feeding your own source of misery! :)

Ok, i'll play this stupid game. Can you answer me one question - What is justice?
 
This job is not made up. Jeffrey Siminoff had this role from September 2013 – January 2016
That's a fair point, but if Apple had a diversity problem why didn't that guy fix it? Hiring someone else is just Apple saying "hey, here at Apple we have a diversity problem, yes I know we project an inclusive message, but no, we played you for suckers but at least now we've finally got someone in to cure this rot"
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.