The single, central home button is a great design feature. [...] but it's a nice and easy way for non-technical types to feel comfortable with the phone.
For similar reasons Apple stuck with one-button Mac mice for many years.
The single, central home button is a great design feature. [...] but it's a nice and easy way for non-technical types to feel comfortable with the phone.
Hmm,
I wish it was also a tad bit wider than just that 2 inch wide.
Put it this way, what would fill a female or male up better that comes equipped on every male, a long but skinny tool (Chris Brown) or a long and thicker private part (Shane Diesel)?
Length is not where it count most, thickness is more satisfying!
![]()
The shorter 1.54 cm bezel in the leaked new part is the same size as the current bezel in the iPod touch.The new front panel has 1.5cm above and below the screen. That's fairly small. I could see why you might want to reduce that a little but the difference would be minimal, wouldn't it? ...
I think we can go too far in reducing bezels. Bezels on flat screen TVs and all that, sure, we don't need them. But on portable devices you have to have some place to grip.
That does demonstrate how nicely the new screen will work for many functions but I think it also shows why the bezels had to remain a certain minimum thickness. On that device they look too thin and the home button is tiny!
For similar reasons Apple stuck with one-button Mac mice for many years.
Fingerprints. Who wants photos or videos of iPhones full of fingerprints?
The shorter 1.54 cm bezel in the leaked new part is the same size as the current bezel in the iPod touch.
Not a big deal.
Is it just me or are those "finger only" gloves freaking anyone else out!![]()
For similar reasons Apple stuck with one-button Mac mice for many years.
The New iPhone
or
iPhone 4GS
GS for good-sized screen
GS for great screen
GS for giant screen
Then why would Tim Cook say that Apple is
going to double down on secrecy. He also said that they would go to any measures to secure future products. As far as I'm concerned, this is drastic measures. It's genius. We'll just see on September 12th. I'm writing your name down
You mean "The new iPhone" or "iPhone 6". The 5th one came out last year.
So if this is the size of the next iPhone then I need to ask...why would anyone with a 4S want it?
LTE is not enough of a reason. And there is nothing else new to sway buyers.
If you have a 3 series phone ok, a 4 maybe....
I sure hope this is not the new iphone.
So if this is the size of the next iPhone then I need to ask...why would anyone with a 4S want it?
LTE is not enough of a reason. And there is nothing else new to sway buyers.
If you have a 3 series phone ok, a 4 maybe....
I sure hope this is not the new iphone.
but watch next year when they stretch this new version out sideways to make it more along the lines of those phones everyone will say it's amazing...
You have a point about the signature. But I'll bring up one more point: patent infringement. If Apple strays away from that signature look, the Android suits would be all over it.
It's that reason I don't agree that this leak is the next iPhone, a prototype maybe but the ratio's, layout etc all very unlike Jony Ive designs. Apple love golden ratios and this stretched look just doesn't sit right and that's before you look at details of camera placement in glass bands on rear etc.
First iPhone i'll skip with no hesitation.
Seeing that home button breaks my heart.
So if this is the size of the next iPhone then I need to ask...why would anyone with a 4S want it?
LTE is not enough of a reason. And there is nothing else new to sway buyers.
If you have a 3 series phone ok, a 4 maybe....
I sure hope this is not the new iphone.
Imagine if this whole thing was a controlled intense leak by Tim. Somehow I doubt it, but man it would be fun if it was.