And down >25% in the past year.
Statistics can say what you want them to say!![]()
This is going to be a really lame upgrade.
- Faster processor? Big deal, they do that every year anyway.
- Super thin side bezels? Major downgrade. I guarantee you there will be issues with accidentally using the touch screen while holding.
- Smaller form factor? Who cares, it's not smaller by enough to make it more portable, but it does mean that any previous iPad case won't fit.
- Longer battery life? Who cares, nobody should be using their tablet all day anyway.
When are they going to add some real specs, like 41MP camera like Nokia has, or NFC like Samsung has, or multitasking, or 128 GB, or some function for the fingerprint sensor (which may not even be included) besides the super rare function of security from intruders?
So far there is literally zero reason for any logical person to be interested in this product. It's actually WORSE than the iPad 4. This is what happens when you trade a visionary like Steve Jobs for a beancounter like Tim Cook.
I don't care if a company loses money left and right...and I don't care if another company gets filthy rich off the ignorant. For me it is not about which company can stockpile the most money. For me it is about having a product that works for me, not one that I have to work for.And Microsoft is trying to market Tablet-PCs as just another form factor of average PCs for over a decade now, bleeding money left and right.
For you this obviously makes sense, as you have bought into the notion that everything Apple produces is magic, it does everything how it should (e.g. we are all wrong to expect a device do anything different), and I should have to buy both an iPad AND a Mac(book) in order for my computing demands be complete. "SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY!!"But you can reduce it with deliberate limitations in your mobile OS, in order to save battery life and keep telephone functionality working.
Because they don't want to understand that iOS is supposed to have no filesystem access for the user.
Which is the reason why it sucks as a tablet. It is too much like a laptop. That is not what people buy tablets for.
Wrong. It boils down to what the creator of the device expects it to do for you.
Adapt or buy something else.
That is the same in the end. Microsoft wouldn't need to write of loses of $900 million, if the Surface would work for anybody. And Apple wouldn't make billions selling iPads, if that product wouldn't work for an awful lot of people. Financial success is tied to product success.For me it is not about which company can stockpile the most money. For me it is about having a product that works for me, not one that I have to work for.
You can't have both, a system that tries to manage itself and a system where the user has full control over every file. If you have both use cases its the best to own two devices, one with OSX and one with iOS. But since you do not appreciate what iOS does for you, you would be fine with just an MacBook Air which coincidentally costs just as much as a Surface Pro.For you this obviously makes sense, as you have bought into the notion that everything Apple produces is magic, it does everything how it should (e.g. we are all wrong to expect a device do anything different), and I should have to buy both an iPad AND a Mac(book) in order for my computing demands be complete. "SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY!!"
Now you are trolling. I give the same advice to Windows and Mac users alike. Learn what the system does and does not. And if it doesn't fit your needs, don't use it. Complaining doesn't change things. You can't enter a baseball club and demand that you want to play football.100% Agree...finally a piece of gold. Unfortunately your entire reply simply reinforces the Apple elitism I mention earlier. "Everything Apple makes is brilliant...everything any other company makes is crap".
The iMac, the iPod, the iPhone, the iPad. Which Apple product isn't worshiped by millions of users? Stop ignoring the facts. Apple isn't a one-trick-pony. They consistently revolutionize industries for the benefit of the user.Apple belongs in the dead pile, the sinking raft that Microsoft was forced to help. Apple has simply stumbled upon a genie in a bottle...polished the rusty lamp and was granted just ONE wish ("I wish that we could have just ONE product that people will worship over everything else").
Like never! We are going in the seventh year and people are still camping before Apple Stores to get the new iPhone. The profits and revenues are growing bigger and bigger.Let's face it, once the *ahem* "magic" of the iPhone wears off, Apple is back in the shadows...because that's all they have is that ONE product...an iPhone...two bigger iPhone's..and then an iPhone store to keep a steady cash flow...all that collapse when the Apple spell has run its course.
No you don't have a choice. You are always told by the creator what to do with their devices. You can only choose which creators decisions you agree with the most. Those who wish not be "told by the creator" shall create their own devices themselves. Go and fork Android (which is another kind of Linux) to whatever system you want. For us consumers, we can only vote with our wallets. And we collectively decided to let the Microsoft Surface bleed money left and right.Really, enjoy your Apple products, it bothers me not that you do...but to those who wish not be "told by the creator"...you have a choice...just think where this world would be if we didn't...
This is going to be a really lame upgrade.
- Faster processor? Big deal, they do that every year anyway.
- Super thin side bezels? Major downgrade. I guarantee you there will be issues with accidentally using the touch screen while holding.
[*]Longer battery life? Who cares, nobody should be using their tablet all day anyway.
When are they going to add some real specs, like 41MP camera like Nokia has, or NFC like Samsung has, or multitasking, or 128 GB, or some function for the fingerprint sensor (which may not even be included) besides the super rare function of security from intruders?
Big reason: Windows 8 sucks
I have a feeling the A7X, and 128GB will be reserved for the 9.7"
4GB is too big a jump, they will go to 2GB first.
I want to think A6X will be used for the mini, but I think it would be too power hungry for it's size.
I think a regular A7's GPU is enough to push it's pixels.
In either case, manufacturing lines for the A7 for both iPhone 5S, and iPad 5 is giong to be too constrained.
I think a power efficient, A6 from the iPhone 5 with it's 3 core GPU will be found sufficient to drive retina resolution in a mini.
Of course there will be a little processor bump. The question is how little?
Quad-core graphics are needed anyway to run a Retina ipad display.
A5 (dual-core gfx) iPad mini 1. generation
A5X (quad-core gfx) iPad 3. generation
A6X (quad-core gfx) iPad 4. generation
A7 (quad-core gfx) iPhone 5s
A5X is too little too late. A6X is most likely for the iPad mini 2. generation and A7 for iPad 5. generation. It would be awesome if both iPads would get the A7 chip. A 64-bit ARM mini computer for $329 would be an instant buy.
But the 32-nm-fab making the A6X needs to be used for something. You can't shut everything down after just one year of production. So the A6X will move from the iPad 4. generation to the iPad mini 2. generation. Its inevitable.
4GB is ABSOLUTELY NOT needed in order to utilize 64bit compute.If Apple uses Sharp's IGZO display; it reduces the power by 50% or more!
There no more excuse to not go with state of the art components. If Google's Nexus 7 2013 can function with 9 hours in a 7" display; Apple should have the technology to make the iPad Mini Retina even better. I sure they had a look at the inside of the Nexus 7 2013! It not that big of a problem to do if Google can conquer the problem; Apple just needs to copy Google's solution and improve on it! A7X is called for here!
4GB is need to compute in 64 bit mode!
----------
The new A7 chip takes about 24% less power then the A6! It is a much thinner wafer design - I think it is 22mm die! There is no reason to use earlier CPUs other then cost!
I don't see the M7 coming in the Ipad unless isn't just for something else than tracking your steps,fitness..ok i could be useful in car while driving,while i'm wondering how long till the best ipad will be melted in the entry Air?
Maybe with Ipad as detachable display and the Intel still under the keyboard?
Surface 2 its not a problem but a lot of people including me will pay for a real Osx in a tablet.
Taking pictures with an iPad is literally the new fanny pack. If you want a good camera with flash, try the iPhone 5S
4GB is need to compute in 64 bit mode!
The new A7 chip takes about 24% less power then the A6! It is a much thinner wafer design - I think it is 22mm die!
I'm upgrading only and only if the new iPad has a 13-inch display.
This is going to be a really lame upgrade.
- Faster processor? Big deal, they do that every year anyway.
- Super thin side bezels? Major downgrade. I guarantee you there will be issues with accidentally using the touch screen while holding.
- Smaller form factor? Who cares, it's not smaller by enough to make it more portable, but it does mean that any previous iPad case won't fit.
- Longer battery life? Who cares, nobody should be using their tablet all day anyway.
When are they going to add some real specs, like 41MP camera like Nokia has, or NFC like Samsung has, or multitasking, or 128 GB, or some function for the fingerprint sensor (which may not even be included) besides the super rare function of security from intruders?
So far there is literally zero reason for any logical person to be interested in this product. It's actually WORSE than the iPad 4. This is what happens when you trade a visionary like Steve Jobs for a beancounter like Tim Cook.
Honestly, I'm torn between the new iPad 5, and a retina iPad mini, especially if they debut at the same time.