... the "lacks connectivity" argument is just stupid. How about a parallel port? Floppy drive? No VGA either![]()
Just buy an adapter!
Actually panasonic laptops, which are real workhorses, do have serial port, VGA, 2xRJ45, RJ11...
... the "lacks connectivity" argument is just stupid. How about a parallel port? Floppy drive? No VGA either![]()
Just buy an adapter!
A macbook is much more a whim than a need or something more useful than any other pc.
Actually panasonic laptops which are real workhorses do have serial port, VGA, 2xRJ45, RJ11...
those ports are not the future and again: get adapters.Actually panasonic laptops, which are real workhorses, do have serial port, VGA, 2xRJ45, RJ11...
I stongly disagree. I am not aware of any other computer on the market that could be a better professional machine for my proposes, which are teaching, research, IT administration and software development. Having a compact and light laptop which is also a powerhouse is much more important to me than legacy options or pointless upgradeability, as I have to move around a lot. A MBP makes my life much more easier and convenient, while allowing me to be more productive.
I understand that the few people who work in certain sectors need ethernet connection, as well as that there are few professionals that need large internal storage capacity. I am glad that those people still have all these legacy options on the market.
For majority of users though, these things are irrelevant. Last time I have used a wired network connection was over two years ago. Optical media — around five.
those ports are not the future and again: get adapters.
sweatshops?I don't know if they are the future, but they are the present in the factories MacBooks, macs and mac pros are being made. Just pointing.
sweatshops?
those ports are not the future and again: get adapters.
Damn ...Image
Tim Cook looks cool next to that mac running windows xp with 1234120 adapters for running the CNC-CMM system![]()
good. You know what you want. Whatever works fo you.There's no way I'm buying a $2000 laptop if I have to buy adapters on top of that.
I got my 2011 MBP instead of a Retina specifically because it had an ethernet port, optical drive, and a replaceable battery. When it dies, I'm getting another used one or going with a non Apple laptop.
Would you be so kind as to pointing us to reliable statistics that back up your claims?
If you take 100 Asus laptops made in 2009, and 100 Macbook Pro's made in 2011, you will have a significantly higher number of Macbook Pro's that are still functioning flawlessly today. Mac's have a longer lifespan and their build quality is light years above the competition. Just because you happened to get a really good windows machine 6 years ago, and a possibly faulty MBP 4 years ago does not mean that you were taken advantage of.
The point isn't that the $700 laptop would fulfill my needs, it wouldn't. But it's lasted longer with more punishing use and is now having to fulfill my needs.
In Australia, by law, a product can be expected to last longer when it is advertised or implied to be of higher quality and is of a higher price than the competition. This should be the case for anything. And, in Australia, it is expected to be. I have contacted the relevant authorities to be advised about what exactly my rights are, I am not a lawyer and do need to have these things explained to me. I'm not saying 'OMG I'M SUING APPLE!' I'm not, and I'd be an idiot to try. I just want to make sure I'm being treated fairly. I will report back with what the results are, positive or negative on my part.
When I purchased my laptop, I know there were cheaper machines with better specs. The understanding was that the quality of the machine, specs aside, would be better in an Apple product. Maybe prices are different in other parts of the world and maybe things have now changed. That's fairly irrelevant to me now.
I have no idea what you people are going on about. I DO expect an extremely expensive laptop to have adequate cooling, higher build quality and components and survive longer than a $700 budget laptop. It's not an apples to apples comparison, I'm just vaguely making my point and venting my angst. I know the $700 notebook will not fulfill my editing needs. But it shouldn't be more sturdy than a $4000 machine. If the netbook hasn't been adequately tested, eh, I got what I paid for. I haven't gotten everything I paid for with the MBP.
These 2011 MacBook Pros failing is a documented issue, they were not adequately tested and were not produced to a standard befitting their price tag. I believe Apple should issue a recall, and I believe they probably will. Until then, I'm pretty miffed and am temporarily holding off on future purchases of Apple products.
3 years is not an acceptable lifespan for a product such as this. Maybe in America it is, but in Australia and many parts of Europe, this is not the case. For my part, this is the first notebook I, or any of my family have experienced within 4 years of purchase. We have old Pentium 4 machines that are still kicking apart from being achingly slow. A few problems is fine, it's to be expected. But my whole machine has been bricked because of a manufacturing fault, and so have a lot of other peoples.
Actually panasonic laptops, which are real workhorses, do have serial port, VGA, 2xRJ45, RJ11...
I expect my fridge, my car or my oven to last no less than 10 years. If a computer lasts less than this, it wouldn't get my vote of confidence.
Actually, I never kept any computer for ten years, but after some upgrades, my 4-years Macbook is still a capable machine. I also have a cheap Asus netbook (Atom N270, upgraded with 64GB SSD, 2GB) which is still working and can do some browsing (Gmail, Facebook, etc).
That is, in my experience, I can't assure a Mac will last way longer than a cheap PC. I will only trust Macs if they pass the 10-years usage keeping some of their original functionality.
I suggest that you purchase a 13" or an MBA. As you probably already know, when you buy a Windows machine, you're not spending 700 dollars. This is all about TCO and productivity...
3 years is not an acceptable lifespan for a product such as this. Maybe in America it is, but in Australia and many parts of Europe, this is not the case. For my part, this is the first notebook I, or any of my family have experienced within 4 years of purchase. We have old Pentium 4 machines that are still kicking apart from being achingly slow. A few problems is fine, it's to be expected. But my whole machine has been bricked because of a manufacturing fault, and so have a lot of other peoples.
If you buy a 4000,- electronical device, you also buy insurance.
Especially for devices you carry around all the time and may drop, like a dslr or laptop.
If you dont get insurance and warranty is out or you drop it or spill liquid, you are screwed.
Like leman mentioned, a more expensive computer doesnt last longer.
Thats why buying upgrades for the whole future proofing mambo jumbo is nonsense.
The ice book G3 systems had very high failure rates...approaching 75%. The G5 systems, save for the last iteration, earned very poor marks for reliability. I'm not saying Apple computers are bad. But Apple isn't immune from problematic systems. Which is what the OP is expressing his concern about.I understand your point, but this is simply not what current technology allows. Everybody cooks with the same ingredients here. I'd say its a 50/50 chance that a computer will pass the 5 year age. You can get more lucky and less lucky. And regarding your last paragraph: we have a 13 years old iMac G3 in our basement, which still works perfectly. Same for a range of MBPs from 2007 to 2014. Still anecdotal evidence is anecdotal. In any case, your conclusion of 'I will not buy Apple again' is in best case misjudged I ensure you that an early death can happen to any computer from ay manufacturer out there. You just got unlucky. We simply do not have the technical ability to ensure perfect quality control.
Can you elaborate on what you mean by this?
----------
The myth that Macs last longer is just that: A myth. I have used all kinds of old PCs and they've held up great. My current daily driver is a $700 gateway desktop I picked up in September 2007. It's gone from Windows Vista to Windows 8.1 Update 1. Only upgrade was from 2GB of RAM to 8GB at a cost of approximately $40.00. Not because I needed to but rather because it was so inexpensive. I have an IBM ThinkPad T40 that is still going strong. A Compaq Presario circa 2005 still running strong.
----------
I can't count how many times Mac advocates have used reliability as a selling point for Macs.
----------
The ice book G3 systems had very high failure rates...approaching 75%. The G5 systems, save for the last iteration, earned very poor marks for reliability. I'm not saying Apple computers are bad. But Apple isn't immune from problematic systems. Which is what the OP is expressing his concern about.
I highly disagree with you. The point of macs is that they're supposed to last longer and be built better.
OP...In the same boat as you are...my 2011 MBP has given way to a screen distorted by artifacts. I have already started to un-Apple my household. Aperture is out, Lightroom is in. iPhone out, HTC in. Over the weekend, will install Windows 8 on my bootcamp and set it as my main OS. I am gonna make it work with Windows this time. I am already paying the price for being so easily seduced by Apple...never again.
Ha. Good luck with that but the problems with Windows may push you back.
Yeah...I don't like Windows. I like OSX more. But what I don't like even more is shelling out 3-4 grand every 2-3 years and then finding ways to lie to myself on how the investment was totally worth it. Been through that twice now. Not anymore. I just can't get past the ridiculousness of a top-tier machine failing in less than 3 years and then saying that the machine was well past its time.
Yeah...I don't like Windows. I like OSX more. But what I don't like even more is shelling out 3-4 grand every 2-3 years and then finding ways to lie to myself on how the investment was totally worth it. Been through that twice now. Not anymore. I just can't get past the ridiculousness of a top-tier machine failing in less than 3 years and then saying that the machine was well past its time.