If they update in March, September seems a little soon to update again. I'm still hoping the next update has 5G in it. Thinking about upgrading.
It's hard to predict iPad futures based on rationality because there appears to be very little rationality driving the product line!
Remember Steve Jobs and his basic 2x2 portable/desk x amateur/pro quadrants? The iPad team looked at that and said, nah, not for us..
Right now we seem to have FOUR separate iPad lines. There's
- iPad cheap (A10, $330)
- iPad middle (A12, $500)
- iPad expensive (A12X, $800 and up)
- iPad small (A12, $400)
Given all this, there's clearly scope for a lot of weirdness. The option that makes the most sense (IMHO) is
- create an A13X on 5nm as a "test chip" for 5nm. Apple has done this before - the A10X was on 10nm while the A10 was on 16nm, and the A10X appeared ~6 months before the A11. The advantage of using the X chips this way is that no-one expects a particular schedule for them, so they can absorb unexpected issues resulting from the new process without the delay causing any embarrassment.
- OK so we get A13X in H1, going into iPad Pro's. MAYBE also with the new Broadcom WiFi6E chip, to boost the radio specs, though that chip may be too new. (Of course new is when it is announced -- who knows when Apple was told about it by Broadcom...)
- could that iPad Pro also get 5G? Maybe. The battery and thermals are a lot more tolerant, even if the chipset available today would not meet Apple's phone demands. Perhaps it gets 5G, but not mmWave?
- meanwhile there is ALSO scope for a general upgrading of all the iPads in H2. Something like
- iPad middle definitely moves to A14 plus some version of 5G (basically iPhone in a bigger box)
- iPad cheap moves up to A11 or A12 (I assume no 5G yet)?
- iPad small moves to A13 plus some version of 5G?
There's additional confusion related to (oh god we all hope so!) the ever closer approaching ARM Mac.
If THIS is the year that the ARM Mac is announced at WWDC, there will presumably need to be developer machines (in and outside Apple) and it would make sense for the first round of these to be based on something like an A13X, even if the consumer machines following six months to a year later are based on some sort of "A14Z" chip specialized for larger machines and a higher power envelope.
Point is, the needs of the ARM Mac might justify the creation of an A13X now, EVEN IF there's going to be an A14X (and/or A14Z) just a few months later.
(And one great thing about Apple is they do do a good job of getting on-going value out of their chips! Even if the A13X seems to have a limited six month run in iPad Pro's and weirdo Macs, it may go inside the 2022 aTV or iPad Air or something.)
[automerge]1581619649[/automerge]
Apple needs to focus on software and not releasing buggy IOS features. iOS 13 was one of the worse releases for bugs.
This might surprise you, but the people in the company with skills at designing the hardware do not have skills at writing the UI software, and vice versa.
Telling the hardware team to sit still for two years will do precisely NOTHING to fix the software problems...