sjpetry said:From what I have heard 10.4 will require a lot more performance than 10.3. Do remember it is a major release.
P.S. Tiger is the first OS to be optimized for the G5 chip which is much faster than a G3 chip.
aesth3tic said:I was thinking the same thing about the Mac Mini being G4....
But, if you think about it, it could be a good thing that it is G4. Once Apple moves the PowerBook, iBook and eMac to G5 within the next year and half (or more...) they will need to continue to offer a G4 to use up the remaining supply, plus that will allow for them to do a couple revs without moving it to a G5. The Mac mini is going to stay G4 for a long time anyways, there has to be a reason for it.
And as far as tiger and 64 bit processors....um thats just crap. All Macs are going to see improvements with Tiger, whether or not they are G4 or G5 or even G3...
nagromme said:I give PowerBook G5s a 75% chance of happening this year. 50% by mid-year. 100% chance of SOME significant upgrade, even if it's still G4.
TheMasin9 said:i know there was already a posting beginning with "from what i heard" and this is goin to be another and i apologize. From what i hear, Tiger is not going to work with computers that have less than 64 mb of vram. This would be apple shooting itself int the foot bigtime because of the 32 meg of vram in the mac mini which hopefully is goin to be a big seller. I think that apple is going to be sure that tiger will work back to at least 32 mb vram because if it didnt, alot of the old TIbooks would not be able to run in Tiger as well. Can anyone reaffirm anthing said here?
Platform said:So how about a Mac mini G4 1.42Ghz with 512MB ram![]()
IDANNY said:I hope !!!!!!!!!
If this happens I would defiantly buy one. If they stayed around the same price.![]()
mkjellman said:tiger will have just about the same specs as Panther...I know they changed one little thing...could be memory..but I am an ADC Select member and have run every version of Tiger so far and they work it even works on an old iMac DV soooo....
also, why would they design a computer that hasn't even shipped yet to be outdated when Tiger comes out...
Hopefully Apple will have Tiger scale better than Panther does because w/o a Quartz compatible machine you really notice the difference
So far thats not really the case..but its alpha right![]()
Hemingray said:iBook G5 eh? Baloney. PowerBook G5 first in 2005, then MAYBE an iBook G5 in 2006 at the earliest! There needs to be more of a gap between the iBook and the PowerBook, like the days of iBook G3's and PowerBook G4's. The iBook was the last to sport a G3, and it would make sense to be the last to sport G4's, too.
on page 2.i_am_a_cow said:woo hoo front page!
The iBook G4 was released on April 19, 2004, so Apple stopped using the G3 at that point.Platform said:When was the last G3 produced![]()
FredAkbar said:The iBook G4 was released on April 19, 2004, so Apple stopped using the G3 at that point.
GFLPraxis said:Ridiculous. I hope we DON'T get PowerBook G5's.
I'm hoping for those new dual core G4's. I'd rather have the 25w dual core 1.5 GHz G4 than a 2 GHz G5.