Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You hate the fragmentation of the streaming market, but feel that the consumer would benefit from separation of services? o_O
Yeah, it's complicated, and I'm probably unrealistic in my expectations. I'm frustrated by the bundling of content creation and delivery. I'd love to be able to see my preferred content through my preferred service.

HBO is owned by AT&T now-- imagine if you could only see Game of Thrones, or Silicon Valley, or Veep or whatever over AT&T wireless... Will I eventually need a Disney Phone to see Finding Nemo?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Victor Mortimer
Aren't there many other capable people for Apple's board who don't have a conflict of interest ?



I'm not sure how someone can make the comparison since AppleTV+ is still relatively unknown.

You may end up being correct but I would wait till both are out before making the comparison.

One note on Disney+. Customers are now expected to get another subscription when a good portion of the content used to be on Netflix ? I can't see how this favors the customer since they only used to need one subscription.
You’re delusional if you can’t see that Apple TV+ is pretty much DOA. It has a laughable amount of content and that won’t change for months/years. If Disney can offer all of this for $6.99 a month, Apple will be laughed at if they charge more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aldaris
I'm starting to feel like Netflix is going to get squeezed out if it keeps heading in this direction, which would be a shame because they really did remake the face of media consumption.

Netflix agrees with you which is why they have been hustling and dumping Billions into creating their own content.
 
Netflix agrees with you which is why they have been hustling and dumping Billions into creating their own content.
Hopefully they'll generate enough of it, of high enough quality, to compete with Disney's massive content library and everyone else's out there. Given the choice between great content and mediocre delivery and great delivery of mediocre content, I know which way most people will go...
 
You’re delusional if you can’t see that Apple TV+ is pretty much DOA. It has a laughable amount of content and that won’t change for months/years. If Disney can offer all of this for $6.99 a month, Apple will be laughed at if they charge more.
Completely agree. Disney just rocked the streaming players with this price in my opinion. Netflix just raised prices, hulu made some adjustments with live video tiers, and Disney just made it a day one subscribe and possibly a ton of annual subscriptions with that price point. We can argue content but apart from Netflix Original’s Netflix has a rotating catalog, same with Hulu and Prime. This is positive competition that favors the consumer who wants what Disney is offering.
 
Why would any company allow someone who works for another on their Board of Directors? Let alone someone who works for the competition. Didn't Apple learn their lesson with Google's Schmidt on their board.
It's very common. You need people with a wide variety of expertise to contribute their advice, and Apple and Disney weren't potential competitors until recently.
[doublepost=1555097857][/doublepost]
Completely agree. Disney just rocked the streaming players with this price in my opinion. Netflix just raised prices, hulu made some adjustments with live video tiers, and Disney just made it a day one subscribe and possibly a ton of annual subscriptions with that price point. We can argue content but apart from Netflix Original’s Netflix has a rotating catalog, same with Hulu and Prime. This is positive competition that favors the consumer who wants what Disney is offering.
Disney can afford to enter the market with a rock bottom price for Disney+. They have tons of cash, and existing content, to ride it out. Once they build a customer base, they will raise the price. Guaranteed.
 
Reminds me of Eric Schmidt sitting on Apple’s board before the iPhone launch.

Not that i’d care about Apple’s TV service, though.

I don't really see the conflict here. Apple is never going to compete with Disney. Disney only competes with Apple on an individual production level. I don't see Apple trying to become Disney, rather more like Amazon trying to offer added value for their products and services. Disney has a whole other agenda. The one place they may overlap is between Hulu and Apple which both seem focused on offering bundled subscription services so all of your TV is channel through a single app. However, I don't see that being a serious concern at all until all cable, satellite, and related services go away entirely, and that's decades away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HailstormX
I've seen a lot of what's in their catalog 10x over. Are they going to produce their own original non-theatrical releases like Netflix, is the real question.
 
I've seen a lot of what's in their catalog 10x over. Are they going to produce their own original non-theatrical releases like Netflix, is the real question.
Its Disney. They already have a massive "straight to DVD" business. I can easily see that becoming, at least partially "straight to Disney+"
 
Nope, he will NOT be on the AAPL Board for very much longer !

Like I said yesterday, he clearly "outwitted" AAPL, & was probably helped tremendously by knowing what the competition (i.e., AAPL) was up to.

Would NOT be at ALL surprised if he is Forced Out by month's end.

Sure, I'm sure he would love to stay on.

Get that competitive advantage for as long as possible !
 
  • Like
Reactions: Victor Mortimer
this Disney vs Netflix war is going to be really interesting. On one hand Disney have the content and franchises. They also seem to be pricing a below cost to get a good head start. Something I feel Netflix will have to match so they aren’t out of the game.

The thing in Netflix’s favour will be that they commission programs based on the analytics they have. Disney is just pulling everything from everywhere.

So what matters most? What people “really” want to watch as expressed by actual analytics vs how cable and movie companies traditionally commission shows?

Also, Netflix are giving directors and producers more freedom. We are seeing shows that probably would never have been made coming from traditional cable/Disney owned companies.

Finally, Netflix spend a lot on regional programming whereas disney+ seems very American centric. I feel Netflix has spent billions putting up all these defences over the last 5 yrs knowing that Disney would come in like this.

Going to be a tough battle...
 
From a factual perspective, AAPL has outperformed DIS over the last 10 years and is about 4 times the size.

Cook added $600B in market cap to AAPL since he took over, or about 3 total Disney companies.

Again, Cook has a better record with his company than Iger. Fact. He’s performed better in terms of annual returns (easily) and added FAR more total value.
Money isn't everything. Tim did a lot of damage to the company. Apple is peaking now and will go downhill. In a lot of ways they are already down. Stocks and customer satisfaction don't go hand in hand.
 
Money isn't everything. Tim did a lot of damage to the company. Apple is peaking now and will go downhill. In a lot of ways they are already down. Stocks and customer satisfaction don't go hand in hand.
For business, yeah it is. Both companies’ primary goal is to increase shareholder value.

If customers are happy, the stock does well. Apple is doing very well, as I outlined with the numbers and facts.

Again, post some specific facts and not just your anecdotes and we will have a real discussion. Tim added $600B in shareholder value and did MANY more things to help the company than damage it. You crying about your Mac update or keyboards didn’t ruin the company.
[doublepost=1555100905][/doublepost]
this Disney vs Netflix war is going to be really interesting. On one hand Disney have the content and franchises. They also seem to be pricing a below cost to get a good head start. Something I feel Netflix will have to match so they aren’t out of the game.

The thing in Netflix’s favour will be that they commission programs based on the analytics they have. Disney is just pulling everything from everywhere.

So what matters most? What people “really” want to watch as expressed by actual analytics vs how cable and movie companies traditionally commission shows?

Also, Netflix are giving directors and producers more freedom. We are seeing shows that probably would never have been made coming from traditional cable/Disney owned companies.

Finally, Netflix spend a lot on regional programming whereas disney+ seems very American centric. I feel Netflix has spent billions putting up all these defences over the last 5 yrs knowing that Disney would come in like this.

Going to be a tough battle...
Disney is the king of content and owns FAR more content than Netflix and far better.

Disney also has much more money and cash flow than Netflix.

I predict pain for Netflix.

Apple is a wildcard and has A LOT of money to simply buy content they need, which is the name of the game. You need content, period. Netflix is burning cash with licensing fees and creating original content. It’s expensive and they need A LOT more.

Disney is winning in the content game. Their library is tremendous and massive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: subway35 and tonyr6
Because?

Ridiculous, unfounded statement.

Go over to DISboards or WDWForums and see what they think about Iger.

From a factual perspective, AAPL has outperformed DIS over the last 10 years and is about 4 times the size.

Cook added $600B in market cap to AAPL since he took over, or about 3 total Disney companies.

Again, Cook has a better record with his company than Iger. Fact. He’s performed better in terms of annual returns (easily) and added FAR more total value.

Iger is CEO of a media company and they STILL don’t have a streaming service. Based on market response today, they’ve been dying to have it and Disney was SUPER late.

I own shares in both companies and think Disney is a top 5 company, but Cook has done better.

LOL at all of you that equate their companies stocks price to their intelligence... THAT is hilarious.
 
Disney happens to be calling their offering "Disney+" and releasing in the fall, just like Apple TV+? We haven't heard everything about these two. I'd guess there will be a $10-12/mo combo offering and they're not competing as much as we might expect.
 
For business, yeah it is. Both companies’ primary goal is to increase shareholder value.

If customers are happy, the stock does well. Apple is doing very well, as I outlined with the numbers and facts.

Again, post some specific facts and not just your anecdotes and we will have a real discussion. Tim added $600B in shareholder value and did MANY more things to help the company than damage it. You crying about your Mac update or keyboards didn’t ruin the company.
I am sure you have already seen when Steve Jobs talks about how did Xerox fail. You probably didn't understand it. History will repeat itself and now Apple plays Xerox's part.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moonlight
Is it a possibility that Apple is buying back shares and keeping them to then trade in for Disney shares in a all share buyout?

Or doesn't it work this way?
 
Aren't there many other capable people for Apple's board who don't have a conflict of interest ?



I'm not sure how someone can make the comparison since AppleTV+ is still relatively unknown.

You may end up being correct but I would wait till both are out before making the comparison.

One note on Disney+. Customers are now expected to get another subscription when a good portion of the content used to be on Netflix ? I can't see how this favors the customer since they only used to need one subscription.
Simply put, Disney has been making content for decades, while Apple just started. Disney knows what fans like and will enjoy the most, while Apple will experiment and risk.
 
LOL at all of you that equate their companies stocks price to their intelligence... THAT is hilarious.
It’s all that matters in business. What other evidence do you have? Cook’s job is to increase shareholder value and he’s done that better than Iger. For an investor, Cook is better than Iger.

You want them to take an IQ test? Play chess?

You have no evidence but still act so smug. I give facts and you dismiss them.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.