Some companies seem to think that those (UK, Germany, France, Italy, Spain) are the only countries in Europe. They always get things first. Shame.
It’s about importantance of the market unit. The others are less important. Same with US and Europe.
Some companies seem to think that those (UK, Germany, France, Italy, Spain) are the only countries in Europe. They always get things first. Shame.
Not all countries are equal. There's probably good reasons this is happening in a way it is. Also EU has freedom of movement, you are in control improving your living standards by moving to more progressive country. Hell, you even can move to UK without a visa now. Taking control of your life or complaining, your choice.
I use NowTV from Sky. You can get Sky Movies and Sky Sports through that.Genuine question - why would this service be restricted by location?
Normally, this is because of negotiations with rights holders (i.e. pay XX to show in YY) - but if Disney own the rights to the content, and it's their first party service, why the restrictions?
[automerge]1573209219[/automerge]
I have sky for 2 reasons - sky sports, and because the sky movie catalogue is better than any subscription service out there.
The countries with € will pay the same as the Netherlands.Iger didn't mention how much European customers would have to pay to access its 500 feature films and over 7,500 shows, including the entire Pixar library and a raft of original content.
Biggest markets first - not really surprising.Some companies seem to think that those (UK, Germany, France, Italy, Spain) are the only countries in Europe. They always get things first. Shame.
They are waiting for exclusive contracts with third-party streaming services to expire (mostly with Netflix). The goal is to have unified international content availability.One day it won't vary by territory - at least I hope so.
How is this even related? Many European countries not included in this roll-out are the most progressive countries in the world (Sweden, Belgium, Finland).Also EU has freedom of movement, you are in control improving your living standards by moving to more progressive country.
Perhaps they just mean Disney's cartoons with Hitler and Nazi symbols in them won't be available in Germany?
Progressive means a different thing for us.How is this even related? Many European countries not included in this roll-out are the most progressive countries in the world (Sweden, Belgium, Finland).
Perhaps I picked a wrong word. Some might call those countries progressive, doesn't mean it's the country I would choose to live in.What has this got to do with progressiveness or living standards? It's not launching in Sweden, Norway or Denmark, and probably those are among the top in Europe regarding those two parameters. I don't see any good reason as to why a freaking streaming service could not launch across the European single/common market at least simultaneously. Anyway, sooner or later it'll launch, as Netflix, Prime Video, and others did.
They have more audience in those exact countries. But I agree.Some companies seem to think that those (UK, Germany, France, Italy, Spain) are the only countries in Europe. They always get things first. Shame.
They were the test country. In fact they already have Disney+.Curious. Why are the Dutch getting it 5 months earlier than the rest of Europe?
Theres no real reason why this should be the case as they own the rights to their own product. Unless they need to wait for deals to expire with other broadcasters.
What has this got to do with progressiveness or living standards? It's not launching in Sweden, Norway or Denmark, and probably those are among the top in Europe regarding those two parameters. I don't see any good reason as to why a freaking streaming service could not launch across the European single/common market at least simultaneously. Anyway, sooner or later it'll launch, as Netflix, Prime Video, and others did.
Please give us your definitionProgressive means a different thing for us.
What has this got to do with progressiveness or living standards? It's not launching in Sweden, Norway or Denmark, and probably those are among the top in Europe regarding those two parameters. I don't see any good reason as to why a freaking streaming service could not launch across the European single/common market at least simultaneously. Anyway, sooner or later it'll launch, as Netflix, Prime Video, and others did.
They used The Netherlands to beta test it. It’s been available free there since September, probably testing the user interface and servers on a small scale before full roll outs.Curious. Why are the Dutch getting it 5 months earlier than the rest of Europe?
Us – me and you. In this context, progressive means for me, countries which get access to the world best tech services first.e give us your definition
Oh, and please clarify, who is "us"?![]()
Because Disney has local representations in every almost every country: Disney Switzerland, Disney Germany (Buena Vista, Walt Disney Company) and so on..they handle all local licenses... not so AppleGenuine question - why would this service be restricted by location?
Normally, this is because of negotiations with rights holders (i.e. pay XX to show in YY) - but if Disney own the rights to the content, and it's their first party service, why the restrictions?
In Scandinavia NENT (Viasat/Viaplay) has the rights to Disney content, and that deal has to run out before Disney+ can launch.
In the UK I believe Sky has the rights.
I would guess that Disney+ will be launched in Scandinavia March 31, 2020.
Yeah but funnily enough, not even all Amazon Prime tv shows are available in Europe.
Prime in Europe (maybe besides UK/Germany) is trash.
[automerge]1573213789[/automerge]
Please give us your definition
Oh, and please clarify, who is "us"?![]()