Disney to Pull Movies From Netflix, Launch New Streaming Services

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Aug 8, 2017.

  1. MacRumors macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    Disney plans to pull all of its movies from Netflix as it prepares to launch its own streaming services, the company said in its latest earnings report (via CNBC.)

    Starting in early 2018, Disney will launch an ESPN video streaming service that will feature approximately 10,000 MLB, NHL, MLS, collegiate, and tennis sporting events every year.

    Then, in 2019, Disney will launch a Disney-branded direct-to-consumer streaming service that offers Disney content.

    [​IMG]

    It's not clear when Disney plans to remove its content from Netflix, but in 2012, the two companies inked a deal that saw Netflix getting exclusive access to Disney, Marvel, Lucasfilm, and Pixar films. Currently, there are dozens of Disney movies available on Netflix, like The Chronicles of Narnia, Moana, Zootopia, Finding Dory, The Jungle Book, Pirates of the Caribbean, and more.

    The deal, though initiated in 2012, didn't fully go into effect until 2016, so Netflix has only had access to a wide range of Disney content for under a year.

    With its huge range of content, Disney stands to become a major competitor to existing streaming services like Netflix and Hulu, and for Apple, this essentially means that if the company ever does manage to launch a streaming service, it may not be able to include any Disney content.

    Article Link: Disney to Pull Movies From Netflix, Launch New Streaming Services
     
  2. eatrains macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    #2
    Well, everyone wanted to pay for channels a la carte. Now you can.
     
  3. sputnikv macrumors 6502

    sputnikv

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2009
    #3
    how obnoxious. why not offer an alternative service with competitive pricing given the library size and offer benefits like the ability to stream films in theaters without making the bulk of your content exclusive to your service?
     
  4. Dekema2 macrumors 6502a

    Dekema2

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2012
    Location:
    WNY or Utica
    #4
    The problem with all of these streaming services is that if a series or season isn't offered on one that you're paying a dozen dollars a month for, you would theoretically need to jump to the other to get it.

    It seems Disney will now just be perpetuating this issue even further, despite the increase in competition.
     
  5. revjoel macrumors newbie

    revjoel

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    #5
    Apple to announce Disney purchase in 10, 9, 8,...
     
  6. chriscrowlee Suspended

    chriscrowlee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2015
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    #6
    Netflix seems to become less and less valuable by the year... Pretty soon all they're going to have left is their couple original series, and a plethora of 1990s movies available in the $1.00 DVD bin at Walmart. They keep raising prices yet keep losing content. I have cable TV still (mainly because you can't pry my TiVo from my grips, and I have Hulu. Had Netflix and between raising prices, adding restrictions like streaming to two devices at one time in the same house without paying more, having to pay more for 4K, etc, I ditched them. They're becoming irrelevant with Sling\DirecTVnow\Hulu Live, etc...
     
  7. jgelin macrumors 6502a

    jgelin

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2015
    Location:
    St Petersburg, FL
    #7
    Fragmentation will be the death of this.
    Eventually consumers just wont have the money to keep adding a monthly subscription service.
     
  8. EliasM macrumors member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Location:
    Brussels
    #8
    I don't get tv and film streaming. Why can't it be like music streaming where you can (in many cases) find the same songs on different platforms? This is most annoying and is forcing people to pay for more subscriptions than would be ideal.
     
  9. BigMovieGeek macrumors regular

    Joined:
    May 22, 2010
    #9
    That sounds an awful lot like Disney Life that we have in the UK. It's a £4.99 per month subscription that gives you access to a huge library of Disney movies, TV shows, books and soundtracks. I have it for the kid (and me ;-) ) and it's well worth the price in my opinion.
     
  10. McFreggle macrumors 6502a

    McFreggle

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2001
    Location:
    Dendermonde/Leuven, Belgium
    #10
    Aren't Apple and Disney linked anymore? Steve Jobs was a link between the two. Is that link gone?
     
  11. TraceyS/FL macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2007
    Location:
    North Central Florida
    #11
    I want another monthly "subscription" like I want a hole in the head. I have to process this one for awhile...
     
  12. chriscrowlee Suspended

    chriscrowlee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2015
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    #12
    Precisely. Many people used the logic "I can get Netflix for $7.99 a month, I don't need cable for $50 a month" ... and now people are finding by the time they subscribe to DirecTVnow, Netflix, and the ala carte stuff they want to add, they're back up spending the $$$ they initially wanted to get away from spending. LOL
     
  13. ersan191 macrumors member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2013
    #13
    Oh neat, the studios are finding ways to encourage piracy again.
     
  14. iVoid macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2007
    #14
    Sigh... this is why I dropped Netflix and don't subscribe to other streaming services: It's very hard to know what's available where.

    It's getting to the point where pirating movies is looking attractive again. :) :p
     
  15. harriska2 macrumors regular

    harriska2

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2011
    #15
    Except here it will be between $10 and $15 per month with minimum wage at about $10 per hour.
     
  16. OldSchoolMacGuy Suspended

    OldSchoolMacGuy

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2008
    #16
    So many complained but so few of them understood that this is what was going to happen.

    Around 25% of your cable bill each month goes to ESPN. That's right, a single channel gets a huge chunk of the money. The rest is divided amongst the rest. People are cool paying $60/month for 100 channels but when you start looking at $15 a month for just ESPN, that seems crazy to most. Thanks to bundling, you get a price that seems more reasonable as it includes far more for the money.

    With unbundling, a number of things happen. First, you have less subscribers. This means that each channel has to increase their rates. ESPN can't afford to charge just $20 a month because now they have far less subscribers. So they have to increase their price in order to make the same amount.

    The sad second thing is that you put a lot of channels out of business. Within your typical subscription bundle, there are plenty of channels you might not watch but some others do. With a bundled service, everyone helps pay for those. Maybe you even really enjoy one of the small channels. But now that they aren't bundled, they aren't going to make enough to survive. Say goodbye to channels like FX and others that don't have the huge viewership of the big 10 to keep them in business.

    There are goods and bads to bundled TV subscriptions. But most don't understand the goods, only believing they'll be able to pay less than what cable companies charge now for even greater choice. That simply isn't true. Enjoy having subscriptions to Netflix, HBO Go, and a dozen others if you want the same choices you use to enjoy.
     
  17. npmacuser5 macrumors 6502a

    npmacuser5

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2015
    #17
    Quality vs Quantity. I prefer Quality and willing to pay more for it. The cable boxes, contracts, lousy support, DVR, skipping commercials, and you still have to pay extra for Netflix, Amazon, HBO, etc. Price is only one part of the user experience.
     
  18. jetjaguar Suspended

    jetjaguar

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2009
    Location:
    somewhere
  19. prowlmedia macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Location:
    London
    #19
    Disney life in the UK is really good value for kids... has a LOT of movies, TV shows and behind the scenes extras etc.

    They have a lot of older content that I hope they will add too - old documentaries etc.
     
  20. sk1wbw Suspended

    sk1wbw

    Joined:
    May 28, 2011
    Location:
    Williamsburg, Virginia
    #20
    Don't worry, they'll offer payment plans just like they do for their parks.
     
  21. mrkkbb macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2016
    #21
    So true, Netflix, Hulu, Amazon, ABC go, CBS all access, HBO go, FX+ (just announced), AMC Premiere, SlingTV, ...
     
  22. chriscrowlee Suspended

    chriscrowlee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2015
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    #22
    Yep. TiVo user experience consistently trumps all other services. That's why TiVo users are like Mac users... once a user always a user. The experience is flawless. Cable company boxes, even the most advanced brand new ones, are garbage. FYI Tivo requires no contract, and skips commercials ;-)
     
  23. hawkeye_a macrumors 6502

    hawkeye_a

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2016
    #23
    Disney owns the content, and as long as they are not breaching any existing contract, they can choose how they want to deliver said content to end users.

    However, I do wonder why a publishing house would want to bear the burden/overhead of maintaining and hosting their own service when they could just let others(Apple, Netflix, whoever) do it for them?
     
  24. pika2000 macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2007
    #24
    But isn't that what everybody wants? A la cate instead of paying one provider (be it the cable companies or netflix) for things you don't need?

    /s
     
  25. napabar macrumors 6502

    napabar

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2008
    #25
    Silly comment to say Apple won't be able to stream Disney's content. Apple and Disney have been in bed together since Jobs was alive. Iger is on Apple's board, even.
     

Share This Page