Well, everyone wanted to pay for channels a la carte. Now you can.
Actually, now everyone can pay each time they want to watch a Disney show, instead of, say, owning the disc or download...
Well, everyone wanted to pay for channels a la carte. Now you can.
So many complained but so few of them understood that this is what was going to happen.
Around 25% of your cable bill each month goes to ESPN. That's right, a single channel gets a huge chunk of the money. The rest is divided amongst the rest. People are cool paying $60/month for 100 channels but when you start looking at $15 a month for just ESPN, that seems crazy to most. Thanks to bundling, you get a price that seems more reasonable as it includes far more for the money.
With unbundling, a number of things happen. First, you have less subscribers. This means that each channel has to increase their rates. ESPN can't afford to charge just $20 a month because now they have far less subscribers. So they have to increase their price in order to make the same amount.
The sad second thing is that you put a lot of channels out of business. Within your typical subscription bundle, there are plenty of channels you might not watch but some others do. With a bundled service, everyone helps pay for those. Maybe you even really enjoy one of the small channels. But now that they aren't bundled, they aren't going to make enough to survive. Say goodbye to channels like FX and others that don't have the huge viewership of the big 10 to keep them in business.
There are goods and bads to bundled TV subscriptions. But most don't understand the goods, only believing they'll be able to pay less than what cable companies charge now for even greater choice. That simply isn't true. Enjoy having subscriptions to Netflix, HBO Go, and a dozen others if you want the same choices you use to enjoy.
Except here it will be between $10 and $15 per month with minimum wage at about $10 per hour.
. . . .
The sad second thing is that you put a lot of channels out of business. . . . .
and you have to buy ESPN 4 times!!!!Well, everyone wanted to pay for channels a la carte. Now you can.
I go from service to service. I stay with one service for few months, then go to the next one, and then the next one. by the time I get back to the first one, it has something to watch again.
Aren't Apple and Disney linked anymore? Steve Jobs was a link between the two. Is that link gone?
Precisely. Many people used the logic "I can get Netflix for $7.99 a month, I don't need cable for $50 a month" ... and now people are finding by the time they subscribe to DirecTVnow, Netflix, and the ala carte stuff they want to add, they're back up spending the $$$ they initially wanted to get away from spending. LOL
But isn't that what everybody wants? A la cate instead of paying one provider (be it the cable companies or netflix) for things you don't need?
/s
It's not clear when Disney plans to remove its content from Netflix, but in 2012, the two companies inked a deal that saw Netflix getting exclusive access to Disney, Marvel, Lucasfilm, and Pixar films. Currently, there are dozens of Disney movies available on Netflix, like The Chronicles of Narnia, Moana, Zootopia, Finding Dory, The Jungle Book, Pirates of the Caribbean, and more.
THIS. If you don't dig college football, zero reason to stream ESPN for majority of users.I only subscribe to certain streaming services when a certain show comes on that month. Like Game of Thrones, Stranger Things etc. Oherwise I could do without those streaming services.
As far as ESPN I just subscribe during College football and NFL season really. Otherwise I could care less about ESPN.
I agree with everything you said, but there is also an alternative for these smaller audience television shows - they can move to YouTube, where they can still get a lot of advertising revenue. I think the main hope here is eliminating the middle man - but since owners of content can charge whatever they want, it rolled over to custom exclusive content instead.
Steve Jobs personally acquired a large chunk of Disney stock in exchange for Pixar. Does his estate (widow) still own this? If so, wouldn't she have a say in whether Apple has access to Disney content?
Exactly. The cable companies are making bad choices about which channels to fund. If a channel can't get enough subscribers at a willing price point to be viable, then the channel needs to go away. That is how it is supposed to work. Welcome to natural selection. Welcome to the way the world has worked for 1000s of years.