Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
14.3% increase. Inflation in USA is 1.4%. Someone at Disney needs a new calculator or steadier fingers? ;)
National inflation has no bearing on the cost of subscriptions or every product and service. If it did we’d be paying $5000 today for a Photoshop CD and $20000 for a basic Mac.

Companies price their product in relation to their future costs, investments, debts, market size and shareholder value. That can mean prices go down, up or sideways.

Inflation is an average measure of a lot of things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hot-gril
I subscribe to streaming channels Netflix, hayU, Disney+, Prime Video, Apple TV+, Sky, CHILI, Britbox, MUBI, STARZ, BFI, and NOW TV.

Wait a minute... No I don't. I've got a life. And a bank balance that's in the black!
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
Cable TV is going to look attractive again soon, it will be cheaper than all of these subscription services, if people subscribe to multiple services.

Subscription services will price themselves out - based upon people subscribing to multiple.
But cable TV is still 200 channels of **** with commercials, so no. Also price of cable also keeps going up too.

I just changed my subscription to the yearly one and my card was immediately charged 69.99 and 6.99....does anyone know what happened? There was a quick pop up about a refund but I couldn't read it.....
 
Last edited:
Netflix's prices have risen $1/mo for the basic tier since the streaming service's introduction in like 2013, which doesn't even keep up with inflation. They've added more expensive premium options, but those haven't taken away from the basic one. Even if they increased it, so what, you can always cancel.

I still think that streaming TV services are going to become more expensive as more exclusivity deals are signed and the top few streaming services' grips weaken, but it'll never be like cable TV again with the insane $50-100/mo costs. There's more competition than there used to be, both in services and content creation, and the threat of piracy is always there to act as a price ceiling (which I find unfortunate).

The basic tier of netflix is 1) still more expensive than the new price of Disney+ per month 2) doesn't even include HD content.... in 2021. You can't even get an HD TV these days, everything is 4k.
 
Still a great deal but I don’t see these yearly price increases stopping. The goal of streaming services is to kill cable and use the cable infrastructure to deliver their content. They started off cheap and pandered to millennials like me with phrases like “cut the cord” to make me think I was a part of some revolution. Then the cable companies had to make up for revenue losses, and jacked up the price of home internet. And so here we are. At least we can watch TV on any device now with better UI/UX compared to a cable box, so it’s not all a loss. But yeah, at this point I’m down to only paying for Netflix and Disney+. Still haven’t paid for Apple TV+, not sure if I’ll keep it around. It’s getting better but I may convert to Apple One at some point.

it wasn’t that all, it was (at least in States) ISP fake DATA caps and charge money to anyone going over (think 4k Streaming) extra money scheme!
 
If you can't see the relationship with any of the streaming services that compete with ATV+ for subscription dollars... a lot of other stuff on this site is going to be just as baffling to you.

It's not that the articles are unrelated to Apple. It's that you aren't seeing the connections. Not everything on this site is verbatim out of Cupertino. Never has been, never will be. In fact I know of no Apple-centric site that does that.
I can very well see the connection but thanks for implying we’re too clueless to understand. Did you notice that in the entire article apple wasn’t mentioned once? Just because something is competition doesn’t mean it has to be reported on. A Disney + price hike has absolutely nothing to do with apple and quite frankly shouldn’t be reported on here.
If you also look at the bottom of the article it shows the real reason why macrumors is writing articles about Disney+….
“Note: MacRumors is an affiliate partner with Disney+. When you click a link and make a purchase, we may receive a small payment, which helps us keep the site running.”
 
I signed up for a year the other day, so there's that. But this is the providers' way of nickel-and-diming (or, in this case, dollaring and two-dollaring) us to death. They're aware they'd lose subscribers if they upped the price $4-5 at a time, so they spread it out, knowing people will stay.

Netflix's premium plan has gone from $13.99/month when I signed up in Dec. 2018 to $17.99 today, and now they may crack down on sharing outside households, even if the people using the account aren't using more than the allowable number of streams.
 
I can very well see the connection but thanks for implying we’re too clueless to understand. Did you notice that in the entire article apple wasn’t mentioned once? Just because something is competition doesn’t mean it has to be reported on. A Disney + price hike has absolutely nothing to do with apple and quite frankly shouldn’t be reported on here.
If you also look at the bottom of the article it shows the real reason why macrumors is writing articles about Disney+….
“Note: MacRumors is an affiliate partner with Disney+. When you click a link and make a purchase, we may receive a small payment, which helps us keep the site running.”
Are you so contextually unaware that you need overt mentions of Apple for you to justify the connection? If that's the case, I can't help you. MR is an affiliate partner with a lot of different companies. That has nothing to do with this particular story. But keep pushing that silly deflective narrative.

There is no site that's all Apple all the time. None. There's plenty of Apple focused content on MR. All you have to do is click on it... and ignore the content that doesn't suit your taste. You'd be less worked up by taking that action. To suggest certain content shouldn't be reported on here requires a level of entitlement that quite frankly shouldn't be on display.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jbachandouris
At some point it won’t be.
I'm pretty sure that currently that point doesn't exist. As being someone who doesn't watch TV-MA content and with 2 young kids at home, Disney+ is a breath of fresh air... killer archive as well as great new content being produced and added. Many MANY other people feel the same way. Sure, Disney may increase its price over time and try to get as much as they can for it, but if Econ 101 tells us anything, they can't ever price it higher than what their customers are willing to pay for it. My gut tells me that all those that are balking at the minor price increase are probably not their core customers. So there's that.
 
Glad I paid for the three year up front deal.

Funny to see all these posts from ones thinking they got a good deal. They’re still proud of it. Meanwhile I’ve had Disney on a one year trial. And now it’s included with Verizon. And still watched only once or twice.
 
Are you so contextually unaware that you need overt mentions of Apple for you to justify the connection? If that's the case, I can't help you. MR is an affiliate partner with a lot of different companies. That has nothing to do with this particular story. But keep pushing that silly deflective narrative.

There is no site that's all Apple all the time. None. There's plenty of Apple focused content on MR. All you have to do is click on it... and ignore the content that doesn't suit your taste. You'd be less worked up by taking that action. To suggest certain content shouldn't be reported on here requires a level of entitlement that quite frankly shouldn't be on display.
Are you so contextually unaware that you need it spelled out for you? The only reason this is an article is because they’re a Disney+ affiliate. There’s even a hyperlink to sign up in the article.
There are plenty of other Apple news site that stick to apple related articles about 99% of the time. Unfortunately, MacRumors has slipped more and more unrelated apple content into their articles.
Of course there will be some cross over but at the end of the day this is obviously strictly written for the purpose of being an affiliate.
 
Are you so contextually unaware that you need it spelled out for you? The only reason this is an article is because they’re a Disney+ affiliate. There’s even a hyperlink to sign up in the article.
There are plenty of other Apple news site that stick to apple related articles about 99% of the time. Unfortunately, MacRumors has slipped more and more unrelated apple content into their articles.
Of course there will be some cross over but at the end of the day this is obviously strictly written for the purpose of being an affiliate.
You're simply wrong. Wrong about the reason for the article and the claim about sites that stick to 99% Apple related articles. Point to any site that validates your claim. How about this. You believe what you want and I'll do the same, and we'll both call it a day. That will give you plenty of time to peruse the many many many other articles on MR that are exclusively Apple content instead of wasting your time on content you claim not to like.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: azmscle
14.3% increase. Inflation in USA is 1.4%. Someone at Disney needs a new calculator or steadier fingers? ;)
National inflation rate is based on average peoples' costs. The average things you as an individual buy might increase in price at a different rate, or even decrease.

Also the rate is still subjective, and it's declared by the same govt printing the money, so I don't even care what it says.
 
Last edited:
Luckily I got in a a special deal for an annual plan at $64 so my wife could watch Hamilton. Since our kids are grown and out of the house, we probably used the service a total of 3 time since then. Definitely will NOT be renewing our subscription - we're not their demographic.


I got mine at the same time and for the same reason, and I thought once she had watched Hamilton a couple of times I could get rid of it. I went ahead and watched some of the classic cartoons from Snow White to Jungle Book and I was surprised at how good of a movie most of them were. So I watched Disney films from the 1990’s- Beauty and the Beast, Aladdin, then watched some that were a lot more recent. Bolt, Tangled, Moana were all extremely good. And seeing them as an older adult meant I noticed things in the plot or script that I hadn’t before. There’s a lot of adult humor there, it’s just not in your face.

And then my wife started watching The Mandalorian. I saw the original Star Wars trilogy in theaters, each as it was released. Not great plots but they were idealistic and fun. Didn’t like the Prequels, or the mangled re-releases of the originals. Then Disney bought the rights and started on the sequels. First one was ok, second one was terrible and never watched the 3rd. My wife spent a month trying to get me to watch Mandelorian. I finally said I’d watch one episode, but probably nothing beyond that.

The people behind that show should have been in charge of Star Wars all along. New characters, new places, and not another Death Star in sight. Entirely new plots using the original framework of races, people and backstory. I CAN LIKE STAR WARS AGAIN. Doesn’t help me with the movie series (I tried, still garbage) but seeing a consistent story with characters that I like (or like to hate) that builds on some of the best parts of Star Wars and can safely ignore most of the recent films was fun. Haven’t watched the Marvel mini series that are out but if they are similar then I definitely want to stick around.

Very long story summarized-there was a lot of good shows and I could watch them at my leisure. I am surprised about how much that I liked.
 
The implication of the article is that if you sign up for a monthly plan today, you will be grandfathered in and your monthly renewal will be $6.99. But I don't believe that it true. I am pretty sure that the price is going up for current subsribers too. Would be a good time to buy a year though.

No, if you sign up today you will be paying $6.99 per month for a year. You have to buy/pay the annual and not the monthly subscription.
 
But cable TV is still 200 channels of **** with commercials, so no. Also price of cable also keeps going up too.

I just changed my subscription to the yearly one and my card was immediately charged 69.99 and 6.99....does anyone know what happened? There was a quick pop up about a refund but I couldn't read it.....

Don't know where you are, but we've got the option of ala carte - buy basic cable then add the channels you want.

I don't do this, I just have subscriptions, Netflix and a couple others, but if multiple subscriptions become more expensive, then the ala carte option may be preferable.
 
Don't know where you are, but we've got the option of ala carte - buy basic cable then add the channels you want.

I don't do this, I just have subscriptions, Netflix and a couple others, but if multiple subscriptions become more expensive, then the ala carte option may be preferable.
I have that too for 30 bucks for 10 cable channels, locals, and some randoms- I assumed you meant going back to a box with 200 channels of garbage. I got that for the locals and the few regular cable/network shows that I watch.
 
Don't know where you are, but we've got the option of ala carte - buy basic cable then add the channels you want.

I don't do this, I just have subscriptions, Netflix and a couple others, but if multiple subscriptions become more expensive, then the ala carte option may be preferable.
It's not going to be. Cable TV exists mostly for people who've got no other choice and don't mind paying a ton (e.g. my grandma). And a la carte or not, you're dealing with fixed streams rather than just watching what you want, and the ad breaks are insane in part because they know people can't change channels without missing half the show.

10 years ago, cable TV made technical sense because the internet capacity and CDNs weren't there yet; it's much easier to stream the same X gigabits to millions of people than to serve X megabits out of a selection of several exabits on-demand. The on-demand cable movies that came about in the late stage (like FiOS) were basically just internet.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.