You can do this?? I had no idea! Lol just got my first iPhone, the 5. I have a macbook air though. What app/program on the mac do you use to do this?
Messages. See below:
http://www.apple.com/osx/apps/#messages
You can do this?? I had no idea! Lol just got my first iPhone, the 5. I have a macbook air though. What app/program on the mac do you use to do this?
The only downside is that another company has access to all your texts/picture messages in addition to your carrier and the recipient's carrier.
Depending on how you feel about privacy - you might not want to use it.
You can do this?? I had no idea! Lol just got my first iPhone, the 5. I have a macbook air though. What app/program on the mac do you use to do this?
I'm almost certain that Daveoc64 is trolling this thread... I just dont see how he could be serious.
I'm not ill-informed, I think you misunderstood.
I never questioned that. I said that I don't want that functionality. You see a clear benefit in it. I would find that annoying!
I don't know anyone who has an iPhone with anything less than unlimited texts or an obscene amount more than they actually need. The point was that iMessage gains me nothing in this regard. I'm not saving money and neither are my friends/family.
It's a feature that relies on far more hardware, software and services to work correctly than SMS does. In my experience, iMessage just fails too often. It's not designed how I want it to work. I want to customise what happens when it fails to send a message. I don't want it to wait 5 minutes and then try an SMS. I just want it to work first time.
If I could choose to receive iMessages, but not send them then I'd probably do that.
While I think this is a clear benefit, it's not one I'm bothered by. I send pictures as emails now, purely because everyone I know has a low data allowance. They don't download my images unless they're on Wi-Fi or their computer. I'm not sure how pictures work on iMessage (I don't know if they download automatically), but with MMS they wouldn't come out of their allowance - so I don't have that concern.
SMS is an incredibly simple system. Nothing that goes over TCP/IP (like iMessage) can ever be described as "simple".
In this country, cell phone plans usually include voice, SMS and data. They're not separated out. If you buy an iPhone, all of the networks either include unlimited texts or an allowance measured in the thousands.
In this country, cell phone plans usually include voice, SMS and data. They're not separated out. If you buy an iPhone, all of the networks either include unlimited texts or an allowance measured in the thousands.
As I said, it's not possible to get an iPhone without SMS included here. If you buy a rolling contract, those usually include texts too - often unlimited.
Isn't tcp/ip layer 2 of the OSI 7 layers? Layer 1 is the physical wire. Layer 2 is not complex. Correct me if I am wrong. What layer does SMS belong to?
I suppose you are just fortunate in only having rich friends and family who avoid PAYG and some of the cheaper plans with minimal texts.
Yes, it is, there are literally thousands of people who buy iPhones either second hand or on PAYG, it is entirely possible to buy an iphone without a high/unlimited SMS allowance.
You also completely miss the point of sending and receiving internationally, it would be costing the sender to send to a phone on a different country's networks. It would be free on iMessage.
Those that don't have an iPhone, obviously can't use iMessage, therefore it's a moot point.
No iPads or iPod Touch either?