The Surface is a laptop.
I disagree with the definition of a tablet. Basically a tablet is a computer device that has a touch screen and you don't need a mouse and keyboard to interact with it.
I don't agree. I think a tablet is defined by the OS it runs. A tablet for me HAS to be running a mobile OS. A desktop OS doesn't want to be touched, therefore Windows Tablets suck. Same reason why an iPad doesn't run the same OSX as iMac. It would he insane.
There is a certain design for tablets and a design for desktop. You can't mix both or it'll suck.
If you use a surface and open Photoshop, it opens the desktop Photoshop. You try and navigate desktop Photoshop with your fingers. Impossible. Out comes the stylus. Do you really want to use a stylus? Hold with one hand and poke at it with the other?
Not to mention, when you're in Photoshop, you're constantly using the keyboard. One hand on the keyboard the other on the mouse. Why? Because it is designed for a desktop OS. So, you'll have the kickstand. The MS flappy keyboard and a mouse with your surface when dealing with most apps. Why? Because it is a laptop, really.
This is the reason the surface is a total failure. People don't want to touch their desktop.
Personally, I view devices that just has a touchscreen to be a tablet, regardless the OS it is running. However whether it is a good tablet or not is another question altogether - there are some terrible tablets out there. I don't think Microsoft has got the balance quite right with their "one size fits all" idea with Windows 8.
Last edited: