Yes of the estimate you supplied and its significance. Yes idc numbers are inaccurate, Xiaomi felt like clarifying IDC’s estimate, apple didn’t feel like it.
I listed two more estimates and asked you to choose whichever one you liked.
Have you not read my last post to you.
That would be the small picture or half of one in the case of apple and the iPhone.
The big picture would be apples revenue and apple is down only 5% yoy.
17% according to apple not 22%, which once again proves idc’s number as inaccurate.
Your argument does not valid.
Because even with a 17% decline that translates into 31 billion dollars, Which as I said was much better than Huawei’s entire revenue for the first quarter, that stood at 26 billion. If you want to compare Huawei as a whole to apple as a whole apple, apple made more than double what Huawei made last quarter.
Why would apple change tactics if the iPhone alone is making more money than the competitions entire company. The same company everyone is saying is doing great, the logic you are presenting is severely flawed when you look at the actual numbers and not a representation of said number.
This is why I claimed you do not understand the metrics being presented.
Overall revenue is the big picture. 5% decline yoy in this market is great for 2019. Competitors can’t say the same.
There will be lot less android oems in the market come next year. yes it’s that bad, that’s why a 5% decline in revenue for apple is much better than Samsung’s 60% decline. Even though iPhones are number 3 for the quarter they are doing much better financially then either Samsung or Huawei.
On the other side your argument is that 5% overall or 17% iphone loss is nothing for apple to change anything.
U really believe that Jimmy lays back in his armchair thinking all fine other companies did worse.
what are we talking about? Give me a break