russed said:i cant say i have ever tucked anything in my pants. pants are to cover bits up so if you were meant to tuck your vest in, then your vest would be pants instead! 🙂
stubeeef said:How can you eat your pudding if you don't eat your meat?
russed said:i will just smile and nod and pretend to know what that means!
iBlue said:not a pink floyd fan, i take it? 😉
MongoTheGeek said:Honestly I am surprised anyone made it through the 80s without knowing that phrase.
The played that song wall to wall in school.
Hey Teachers! Leave those kids alone.
iBlue said:not a pink floyd fan, i take it? 😉
stubeeef said:OK, I do if I am wearing a suit. Yes I hate when my tshirt rides up my back and I am not wearing my suit coat
iGary said:I know someone who does *cough - partner - cough* and he thinks it's odd that I DON'T.
Well?
srobert said:I usually wear vintage styled trousers with high english backs ("v" cut) and suspenders (no waist bands). Plus, I have my tailer sow in a stripe or rubbery non-slip material all around the inside of the waistline. I often wear a vest on top of that, so, no way my shirt could ever becomes untucked under those conditions. ^_^
Undershirt tucked in underpants? Definitly not. Big no-no. Fashion faux-pas.
mpw said:Vest US =Vest UK =![]()
![]()
Tank Top UK =Tank Top US =![]()
![]()
Piarco75 said:If I had an undershirt I personally wouldn't tuck it into my underpants. But then I don't own an undershirt as I don't live in the 1950's 😀
(Sorry, couldn't resist!!)
MarkCollette said:....
3. Hell, don't even tuck in your shirts at all. If that looks sloppy, you bought the wrong shirt.
Piarco75 said:If I had an undershirt I personally wouldn't tuck it into my underpants. But then I don't own an undershirt as I don't live in the 1950's 😀
(Sorry, couldn't resist!!)
floriflee said:There's nothing like looking at a man wearing a white, somewhat transluscent button-down shirt and seeing his skin/hair underneath. Mmm, mmm, mmm. 🙄