Do you tuck your undershirt into your underpants?

[pacman7331]

my undershirt in my pants? NEVER

 

[Piarco]

There's nothing like looking at a man wearing a white, somewhat transluscent button-down shirt and seeing his skin/hair underneath. Mmm, mmm, mmm. 🙄

Don't wear white! I don't own a single white shirt - there are colours out there you know....

 

[srobert]

Don't wear white! I don't own a single white shirt - there are colours out there you know....

How would we know, we live in the 50s. 😉

 

[Piarco]

How would we know, we live in the 50s. 😉

A point well made! 😉 😀

 

[iBlue]

Don't wear white! I don't own a single white shirt - there are colours out there you know....

wow, I love white; I wear it probably more often than any other color. (close running to red or black) I can't imagine not having white in my closet.

 

[jsalzer]

Whore?

Well. To be fair, the reasons why people whore undershirsts back then still applies today.

Oh, Freud!

Here's how you prove it to him, Gar - "comfort waist bands". Why would they bother if people were to wear them outside of their shirts?

And if that doesn't work, dump him for me. I'm still saving myself for you and your stash of one-button mice, you know.

😉

 

[MongoTheGeek]

😉 was that intentional? i like it.

🙂 Of Course.

Didn't hang out on Alt.Callahans for 5 years for nothing.

 

[MarkCollette]

or perhaps took the wrong job (?) 😉

Hahaha, yes. If I go into stores made for older men who wear suits, their dress shirts are made with the elongated fronts and backs, and have to be tucked in.

If I instead go into stores made for men in their 20s and 30s, and look at dress shirts made to go with slacks and jeans, then they are made to not tuck in.

EDIT: In any case, there are dress shirts available for more formal occasions and employment, which do not require tucking in.

 

[scem0]

Us fair skinned folk don't always have a choice. Non-whites tend to make us look albino 😉.

e