Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
There's a difference between talking about something and doing something. HUGE difference, in fact.

So I guess you don't watch TV or movies with violence or play any FPS video games (or other violent games) because those also glorify violence. Or wait, is it okay when whites are doing the violence, just not blacks? And yes, your use of "thug" as a racist pejorative gives your race away.

Dude, I'm black and grew up in the inner-city. I grew up on this music. I moved out of the city when I was 14 and had to watch the colors and sneakers I wore back in the 80's. I'm old enough to remember when radio stations played NWA uncensored. I didn't know a white person until I went to highschool in the burbs.
My favorite songs were from the NWA (Fat Girl and Just don't bit it) and trust me; I only looked at girls as sex objects. And at a young age you don't know if what their saying is real or fake. It's not until you get older do you realize this.
And just for your knowledge snoop dog did kill someone in real life.
 
1.) Radio is free
2.) Satellite radio is a monopoly for the most part.
You don't pay for each and every station on satellite radio.

There is a big difference.

That's a bad analogy. You don't have to pay for individual terrestrial/satellite stations.


You two are missing the point.

I doesn't matter if it free (terrestrial) or bundled (satellite)

The fact still remains: No stations has all the same library. Not even stations with the same genre.

You still have to juggle between multiple sources to hear the content you want.
 
All of these exclusivity deals are going to drive me back to pirating music.

If you don't release your music to every streaming service, at the same time, I'll gladly download from a source where you won't get a dime of my money.
Let me get this straight: Your sense of entitlement is so great that you can justify stealing -- out in the open, on a public forum -- because things aren't setup exactly the way you want them to be?

And so far 17 other people agree with you.

Wow. Just wow.
 
This has nothing to do with if you like Dr Dre and you think is music is either legendary or utter garbage.

It has to do with Apple Music "exclusives" which is going to make Spotify start trying to do the same, then maybe Google gets into the game and then there is Google exclusives and then maybe Panadora gets someone exclusives.

Next thing you know 60% of the music you actually like (not Dr Dre) will be on one service, 20% Here, 15% there, 5% somewhere else. Or entire record label exclusives which will be even worse.

So if you want it all you have to subscribe to multiple services which #1 is inconvenient #2 costly.

These exclusive deals are only gonna get worse, this might only be a small shot fired.
I mean its a 20 year old gangster rap album. But it's meaning is far greater in the direction things will be headed, I am afraid.
Or you could buy the album if it's really that important to you.

Crises averted.
 
Kinda feel like anyone who wants to hear it should already own a copy. Though it will be nice for this to pop up in my radio...should I use apple music.
 
Kinda feel like anyone who wants to hear it should already own a copy. Though it will be nice for this to pop up in my radio...should I use apple music.

I already own it on vinyl and cd. But it's a little different now that I can stream it anytime from all my devices

I'm not walking around with a CD player anymore
 
This is only good news for Apple, bad news for the rest of us.
Nah the chronic is an all time album and apple music will be the largest streaming music service in four months and cost the same as anyone else.

We don't lose if one service commits to trying to be the best. It's up for the others to compete.

Personally between google music and apple music I think spotify is in huge trouble. 15 months from now they will. E in desperation mode.
 
"One of the ways Apple will draw customers to Apple Music is through exclusive content that's unavailable on other music services. Pharrell will release his new single "Freedom" exclusively on the platform, Taylor Swift has already promised to make her 1989 album available on Apple Music, and now Apple has confirmed that Dr. Dre's album The Chronic will also make its streaming music debut on the service."

Good god. How have things become this bad? Pharrell? Swift? What the hell is going on. Just say no.

Says someone who apparently is not aware modern music drives the entire music industry and has forever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ErikGrim
I don't mean to hate or disrespect, but was I the only one who though:
"LOL wot? Who cares?"
I mean, really, would we care at all if Dre was not connected at all with Beats?
I honestly shook my head when I saw the cover of the album and I though how this is news now.
Yes one of the greatest music producers of all time what a waste.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ErikGrim
Dr. Dre works for Apple and Taylor Swift is in cahoots with them. The only other thing I can see being absolutely 100% exclusive to Apple Music is The Beatles. Everything else should be available on every service.

Are all the same cars available in every dealership?
Are all the same movies available in every theater?
Are all the same clothes available in every store?
 
I think it has more to do with where this is going to take streaming music if it doesnt get put in check than simply loosing artist A or B if your on a different service. Fragmenting streaming services like this doesnt do anything but hurt the customer. I really dont want to have to subscribe to more than one streaming service to get the music I want.
This is total crap.
I still carry my music around. Sure some is download the non proper way and some is bought.
At least it's not draining my battery, screwing my battery and constrained by good reception.
I see this streaming nonsense as a combination of both slothfulness (ours for not pre arranging our music and just wanting to listen whatever as we go) and Apple's for making more than 16 gigs outrageously expensive.
 
All of this exclusivity stuff sounds good until Google or Samsung start a streaming music service and have their own exclusivity deals with popular artists.
 
Are all the same cars available in every dealership?
Are all the same movies available in every theater?
Are all the same clothes available in every store?
Man. Take a chill pill. And a reality check.
My 2008 posts were kind of like yours. Trying to find reason and taking Apple's side on whatever. Apple is a company and, like others, they are just after our money.
This whole streaming thing is just a huge dildo up our rear ends (or to the people who are too lazy to organize their own music). I am an apple shareholder and I hope people stick it to them on this one.

note from spoderdood
I'm not trying to be patronizing here. I'm just trying to point out that I've been around for sometime now. peace ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jazwire
Of course anyone can just go buy the album. I think his point was more that this trend is ultimately a negative for the streaming music services if it only gets worse.




I think you exaggerate the ease in the "seamlessness" over the other providers. You still need to sign up for the account. Installing an app requires maybe one additional step?
It's fully integrated into iOS, so you can do things like ask Siri to play you a certain song or to start a radio station based on the current song playing, just as two quick examples off the top of my head.
 
The first time I had heard of Dr Dre was when Apple bought Beats. In fact, the first time I had heard of Beats was when Apple bought Beats, although I had seen their ugly headphones without knowing (or caring) what brand they were. Yes I am middle aged and sad, no doubt, but Apple seems to be losing any genuine integrity and style they perhaps once had by getting into bed with anyone and anything that can help raise another dollar, regardless of quality or substance.
He is one of the most successful music producers of all time.
 
Slightly off topic, but can someone please explain to me or point me to an article as to what exactly the difference is — between the current Apple Radio and the upcoming music service, and as to why it's worth $10/month?

Currently, what you know as Apple Radio will stay as Apple Radio (a free streaming service that has limitations such as you can't pick the next song to play, you can only skip forward but only so many times, and it plays ads, as an example. Think of it like Apple's take on Pandora).

The new Apple Music will essentially offer 2 services. The beats1 radio station which, from what I've read, will be free to use for all iTunes users. It is essentially just a radio station though, so again you don't pick what you want to hear, and I don't think you'll be doing any skipping either. It's essentially free radio.

The second part of Apple Music is the meat and potatoes of it all. It's the main music streaming service that you would be paying $10/mo for (note, you don't pay for the other parts of the service; just this part costs $10). This is essentially Apple's version of Spotify, in that it streams music, but not at all like Pandora. This is like music on demand. You pick what you want to hear, when you want to hear it. You can make your own playlists that can contain any of the millions of songs available on the service. You can skip to the next song as much as you like. You can listen to curated playlists or make your own. You can find a specific song and play it, on demand. And there are no ads to listen to.

I hope this helps explain it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.