Become a MacRumors Supporter for $25/year with no ads, private forums, and more!
  • Did you order new AirTags? We've opened a dedicated AirTags forum.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
52,404
14,106
https://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogodarkd.png

ThinkSecret reports that Apple will be upgrading the PowerMac G5 line in the near future -- possibly as early as the end of this month.

The high end Mac configuration last saw minor updates in April 2005 with the high end PowerMac only being bumped up 200MHz (2.5GHz -> 2.7GHz).

According to the rumor site, the new PowerMac revisions are expected to utilize the 970MP Dual Core PowerPC processor. The existence of a dual core variant of the PowerPC 970 (G5) has been long rumored/speculated, but was finally officially announced by IBM in July 2005. This was after Apple's historic announcement that they would be migrating to Intel processors in the future.

Still, many expect that Apple will utilize the Dual Core 970MP processor in upcoming PowerMac revisions before moving to Intel. The dual core version of the PowerPC 970 is reported to have up to a 50-80% performance improvement over the single core version.

Indeed, analysts had predicted that Dual Core PowerMac G5s might arrive at Apple Expo Paris which kicks off next week on September 20th 2005. The most recent announcement that there will be no Keynote Speech at Apple Expo Paris dashed the hope of many enthusiasts that there would be any product releases during the show. ThinkSecret, however, appears to believe that PowerMac updates are coming soon. Of note, they don't expect PowerBook releases for some time -- possibly as late as MacWorld Expo San Francisco in January of 2006.
 

iGary

Guest
May 26, 2004
19,580
4
Randy's House
As much as it hurts me to say, with my two-month-old machine, the line needs some pizazz. Dual 2.7GHz does everything I need it to do and more, but a dual core would be sweet.

No PowerBooks? WTF?
 
Comment

kingtj

macrumors 68030
Oct 23, 2003
2,606
747
Brunswick, MD
Kinda cool... but....

The rapid updates to the Mac desktop lines are de-valuing the older systems at a quicker pace than what is traditional for Apple hardware. On one hand, that's fine - because it means they're pumping out the upgrades at a rate more in line with the rest of the computer industry. But it also means I'm less likely to fork out the money for an upgraded system.

(I have a Dual 2.0Ghz tower, for example, that in about a years' time, is worth over $1000 less than it was when I got it - despite buying it at a discount when new. If I wanted to upgrade to a new dual-core G5, I wouldn't be able to get enough out of this machine, used, to be much help in offsetting the cost of upgrading.)
 
Comment
would existing software be able to take advantage of the dual cores or would that take special optimization? If it does take work, adobe will be pissed with all the software they have to write for the mac lately.

Otherwise, yay! 50% boost in power at a minimum! I gets my official stamp of approval.
 
Comment

longofest

Editor emeritus
Jul 10, 2003
2,865
1,487
Falls Church, VA
I just really hope that they actually use 2 970MP's, so you have a 4 core G5. Burn Baby Burn!!!

I am actually going to be in the market for a new PowerMac this time around, but it really depends upon what Apple releases. I refused to upgrade when they only released 200 Mhz speed bumps. But hopefully this time will be much better!

My computer now= 2x1Ghz G4 (Quicksilver) / 1GB Ram / Geforce 4 Ti
My G5??? = 4x2.5Ghz G5 / 2GB Ram / Radeon something or other... (I game on my PC now, cuz of what happened with GameSpy not letting Mac users play against PC users for newer games... poop on them, so I use my PC for games, Mac for EVERYTHING else).
 
Comment

Sun Baked

macrumors G5
May 19, 2002
14,859
57
However there also really wasn't a big move on processor updates on the XServe, since they are a darn good indicator of the state of IBMs low-power chips.

Sort of worrisome that they were not able to find a low-power 2.5GHz chip yet.

Of course it's hard to tell what the real changes were, since the dev note has not been posted yet. :(
 
Comment

longofest

Editor emeritus
Jul 10, 2003
2,865
1,487
Falls Church, VA
kingtj said:
The rapid updates to the Mac desktop lines are de-valuing the older systems at a quicker pace than what is traditional for Apple hardware. On one hand, that's fine - because it means they're pumping out the upgrades at a rate more in line with the rest of the computer industry. But it also means I'm less likely to fork out the money for an upgraded system.

(I have a Dual 2.0Ghz tower, for example, that in about a years' time, is worth over $1000 less than it was when I got it - despite buying it at a discount when new. If I wanted to upgrade to a new dual-core G5, I wouldn't be able to get enough out of this machine, used, to be much help in offsetting the cost of upgrading.)

What are you talking about??? Apple has been horribly SLOW updating the PowerMac line! This, admitedly, would be a quick update. But the Dual 2Ghz PowerMac went for 1 full year without being TOUCHED! Then the 2.5 Ghz model with for another 9 months before getting the slap-in-the-face 2.7 Ghz update.

Besides, Macs hold their value 10x better than PC's anyday. So yeah, they might loose value over time, but that's just life.
 
Comment

riversky

macrumors regular
Mar 19, 2005
146
0
Sounds true!!!

The PowerMac will be the last to move to Intel so they need some power to keep sales going in the broadcast and creative markets until late 2006 when the transition takes place....

The PowerBook thought seems right on. Why? The are selling well, don't really need to invest in any updates because they are state of the art now and there is really no significantly faster G4 available. They will transition the PowerBook to Intel in the first have of next year so why intro something new now. No need.

Black PowerBooks here we come. Apple will have to make them look TOTALLY different from PowerPC based ones. Black nano is a hint.
 
Comment

ipodG8TR

macrumors member
Jul 18, 2005
44
0
South Florida
That better be a dual, dual-core PowerMac

I've been continually pushing back my next Mac purchase waiting for something that will be really worthwhile. If the PowerMac doesn't get a major upgrade then I'll probably end up going with a 20" imac just to make it through the Intel switch.

What the PowerMac needs;
1. Dual, dual-core G5
2. Standard Airport and Bluetooth
3. Faster dual-layer DVD or Blu-ray
4. Standard 1GB RAM (would be nice for a pro machine)
5. Better graphics card

What do you think? I don't NEED a new Mac yet, but I don't want a rev 1 Intel Mac either. Or do I wait for January to get iLife '06 bundled?
 
Comment

Kobushi

macrumors 6502a
Jun 7, 2005
540
0
Right behind you.
humph...

On one hand I'll be upset if they don't do something with their powerbook line. But on the other, I'll be laughing at my brother who has to have the best of everything and his dumb "old" 2.5G G5 dualie. :rolleyes:
 
Comment

amac4me

macrumors 65816
Apr 26, 2005
1,303
0
If we do see Dual Cores then my G5 2.5 system will be 2 models behind :(
 
Comment

ipodG8TR

macrumors member
Jul 18, 2005
44
0
South Florida
riversky said:
Black PowerBooks here we come. Apple will have to make them look TOTALLY different from PowerPC based ones. Black nano is a hint.

The black nano is nice but I don't know about a glossy black powerbook. Like having a black car -- looks great as long as it is always cleaned and waxed but otherwise shows all kinds of dirt and scratches.

If anything Apple should capitalize on the public's desire for color choices and sell aluminum keyboards and mice or even black ones so you can coordinate your desktop with your nano.

I predict nano colors by Christmas. Apple needs to add pink and silver, the two most popular mini colors. Or a limited edition Titanium nano. That would be cool.
 
Comment

yellow5

macrumors regular
Jun 28, 2005
129
0
These rumors of updates kinda tear me both ways.

One I really like where Apple updates it product lines with new exciting technology.

But on the other hand I just bought a Dual 2.7 PowerMac about two months ago, and I really like the idea of having the best PowerMac out there.

Makes me CRAZY!
 
Comment

ipodG8TR

macrumors member
Jul 18, 2005
44
0
South Florida
Not to worry

at least you're still in the lineup... for now. Those who bought the first dual 2GHz PowerMacs have really had a nice ride. That model had the longest lifespan in the lineup I can remember.

amac4me said:
If we do see Dual Cores then my G5 2.5 system will be 2 models behind :(
 
Comment
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.