Has a point... and shame on me for saying so...
shawnce said:
Don't under estimate the capabilities that Vista brings to the table. It is the start of many new capabilities for Windows that application vendors will begin to leverage over the coming years. In many ways it is much like the transition from Mac OS to Mac OS X. It is not just a warmed over version of Windows but many fundamental things have changed and added to the operating system. It is catching up to Mac OS X in various areas and passing it by in others (areas arguably not that important to Apple at this time).
Vista will be disruptive in the Windows world at first but you should expect it to start to smooth out with the first service pack and with the release of updated applications.
Personally I will continue to use and want Mac OS X but I will be getting Vista for my PC systems once things stabilize.
How many of us can remember "Diesel"? That was the nickname for Spindler, who was going to whip Apple into shape. Then it was Amelio - don't ask me what his nickname was... But between them they saw Apple thrash about madly and in vain trying to find some cohesive vision for the MacOS's future.
Let's see if I can recall all the stutter-starts and just plain non-starters: Taligent, Pink, Copland, Gershwin, Liberachi (kidding!)... I probably missed a few in there, and I think Taligent and Pink were "related". But the point is, Apple struggled for years to find a realistic and achievable foundation for a future OS. Then there were rumors of Apple buying the BeOS - imagine Jean Louis Gasse trying to work a crowd with, "One more thing...". However, the price was too steep. Next thing you know, Apple has dished out even more than Be's rumored price to buy NEXT and its NextStep (or was it OpenStep?) - I seem to recall $470 Million?
Even then Apple had to put in 3 years of labor (1997-2000?), throwing terms like Rhapsody, Yellowbox, Redbox, Bluebox, Whateverbox at us, before the beta of MacOS X emerged... That was approximately 7 years or more of pain for users & developers alike. And even then version 10.1 was the first "useable" version. I know, that's when I first put MacOS 9 "in the closet" of my hard drive, only taking it back out for emergencies.
However, that still doesn't completely excuse Microsoft's inneptitude in that they had close to $40 Billion IN THE BANK, with thousands of programmers at their disposaal, and still could not write a modern OS in a timely manner... Heck, they had to pull hundreds of those people off Longhorn so they could work on security patches - was there any piece of Microsoft software that didn't have the swiss cheese of holes in its code base?
Now I think they're just trying to rush it to market (just like the xBox 360) just so they can say they accomplished something. Nevermind that it's missing half its promised feature-set, or that it's easily 2 years behind schedule...
But back on topic - Yonah notebooks:
Dell is also listing one, so I went to their online store to price it out. Not expected to ship until Feb. 13th, though. Here's the link to configure the Inspiron E1705, so check it out for yourself. Sounds like a 17" PowerBook would be similar.
http://configure.us.dell.com/dellstore/config.aspx?cs=19&kc=ref&oc=ie1705s1&x=8&y=9
PS: Just for a hoot, check out this page for Dell:
http://www.dell.com/html/us/products/ces/index.htm