Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Dumbest naming convention in Apple's history
- Thread starter sniffies
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
AppleFan91
macrumors 68000
CooKieMoNs7eR
macrumors 68020
adammull
macrumors 6502a
I think this the most successful naming convention in Apple's history. Three unique models with differing characteristics, the gang of Jony, Angela, Tim, and all the other peeps I'm on a first name basis with really hit one out of the park. I wish they would rename everything in America.
-Signed, the apparent mindless tweetbots that have taken over MacRumors Forums
-Signed, the apparent mindless tweetbots that have taken over MacRumors Forums
mightyjabba
macrumors 68000
The stainless model is the "normal" model, so it's called simply "Apple Watch." The sports version of Apple Watch is "Apple Watch Sport." So far so good.
"Apple Watch Edition" however makes little sense to me, although it does sound vaguely fancy.
"Apple Watch Edition" however makes little sense to me, although it does sound vaguely fancy.
dannyyankou
macrumors P6
Do people really not understand what the OP is saying?
He's basically saying it's weird to call it the "Apple Watch Edition". It's like "what edition?"
Same with the standard apple watch. When people ask "which Apple watch do you have", the correct response would be "the Apple Watch".
It's a little confusing. The only one that really makes sense is the Apple Watch Sport.
He's basically saying it's weird to call it the "Apple Watch Edition". It's like "what edition?"
Same with the standard apple watch. When people ask "which Apple watch do you have", the correct response would be "the Apple Watch".
It's a little confusing. The only one that really makes sense is the Apple Watch Sport.
Technodynamic
macrumors 6502
There's a reason it was back in 1995.
But in 2015, Apple Watch Edition surely takes the cake.