Alex, Apple's mac pro, which is designed very well, hits temps over 95 degrees celsius when stressed http://www.anandtech.com/show/7603/mac-pro-review-late-2013/14 Are you saying your have build such an enclosed chasis that beats Big Desktop cases in cooling the CPU/GPU. Even with the best air-cooled massive heat sinks I could not get 60 degrees.
Are you sure those a max temps when stressed tested?
Do you have an easy shortcut to cut/paste files in the finder?
No? I did not think so.
Just drag them into new folder. Now it's my turn. How do you scroll two windows at the same time without having to click them first. It's easy for a comparison.
Apples and oranges... Anandtech is publishing core temps, Alex is citing heat spreader temp (Tcase vs Tjunction), or something more misleading. Big difference. What you see in the Anand's review is what you would expect from Apple engineering. The 130w CPU hits thermal limiting and throttles only under an artificial testing scenario, in Anand's words "I have to stress that I haven’t been able to get this to happen in any normal workload, only what’s effectively a power virus for the GPUs and something quite unrealistic for the CPUs."
Who knows what you're seeing in Alexander's "test", he won't say what prototype it's on, he has repeatedly avoided answering a straightforward question about whether he even has tested a prototype that is anything like the renderings - the only prototype pictures he's posted are from a completely different case with an ATX power supply. He claims on his site that the case will work with "any i7 CPU", while he has only tested his prototype with a 84w i7, yet the more powerful i7's are up to 140w, or 67% more thermal output. This was pointed out to him before and, as usual, he ignored it.
I've noticed a strong pattern in this thread of Alexander ignoring inconvenient facts and questions, and instead when anyone asks a fact-based question or points out an inconsistency in his thin data, he thanks them for posting, acknowledges there are "differences in viewpoints", cherry picks out everything that could be construed as positive and moves on. Standard sleazebag marketing communication techniques.
I think anyone who backs this case will get what they deserve. It's not going to live up to the claims, and it's going to ship late, if ever. Based on what I've seen in this thread and on his website, there's been a lot of inconsistent claims, facts that don't add up - even by Kickstarter standards.
Rob
Im not sure where you got the comments "I have to stress that I haven’t been able to get this to happen in any normal workload, only what’s effectively a power virus for the GPUs and something quite unrealistic for the CPUs." I didn't didn't say that in this forum or any other place.
Unfortunately I do not have the luxury to buy all the i7, i5, i3 cpu's in the market. Yes more powerful i7 have came out and will continue. But I was very clear that we tested the Dune case with a Intel i7 4470k with standard cooler. The purpose of Kickstarter is help small startups like me to make a product come true. We have a limited budget and spent money on prototypes and due diligence. With all that done we have come to the point were Dune Case can be put into production and Kickstarter is the platform we choose to help make that happen.
That's pretty damn blatant.
the only prototype pictures he's posted are from a completely different case with an ATX power supply.
Rob
Alexander - your kickstarter page states “it supports mini-ITX components, including…the fastest i7 CPU (to date)”,
None of the prototype pictures that you’ve posted show a working prototype that has the configuration of the renderings - this has also been pointed out a few times, and you also skipped direct questions about whether you have tested a machine in the configuration you are advertising on the kickstarter page. That’s relevant because
- if you aren’t prototyping something pretty damn close to the final product, the already aggressive 120-day to ship time seems even less likely
- if you are testing on a prototype that is significantly different in size/layout/components, the thermal characteristics, and therefore the cooling requirements and performance are going to be dramatically different
Rob
Don't let that Galaxy fans hear you say that!It's the Samsung of desktop computers.
You mean like the iPad Pro is clear rip-off of Microsoft's Surface Pro?
At the moment there is 2 x (HDMI 2.0) or 2 x (DP 1.2) ... and potentially USB-C with a HUB that has 2 x (HDMI 2.0) or 2 x (DP 1.2) just to be clearer![]()
Yep, just like that. You're good at this!You mean like the iPad Pro is clear rip-off of Microsoft's Surface Pro?
No censorship has happened. Instead, there is a rather lively discussion about the product. (Something you claimed later in the same post that is in the consumer's best interest to give.)Censorship and attacks on product or developer don't help anyone.
This is especially ironic, when paired with your *incredibly* incorrect 'armchair lawyer' statement later.Armchair "lawyers" ... ought to shush.
Not to mention the fact that we're not discussing *copyright* here, but rather trade dress, and design patents.Shipped products are not recalled for copyright violations, as far as I know, just discontinued.
And yet, prospective consumers are showing *great* interest in the 'source of inspiration' for this case, while the 'designer' tries very, *very* hard to pretend that the elephant in the room is, in fact, a house cat.Copyright and sources of inspiration are irrelevant to consumers.
That's *exactly* what's happening, and yet you told them to "shush".Therefore, it is in the consumer's best interest to give constructive feedback...
So, it's in their best interest to pay money and *hope* that the project is allowed to ship, with no guarantee that they'll ever see anything for their money, despite the rather obvious elephant in the room, and the absolutely unrealistic timeline promised by the project?...and hope that the project is allowed to ship in the best design iteration it can.
So, it's in their best interest to pay money and *hope* that the project is allowed to ship, with no guarantee that they'll ever see anything for their money, despite the rather obvious elephant in the room, and the absolutely unrealistic timeline promised by the project?
I've never seen anyone claim that it was in someone's best interest to pay money for *hope* before..
Hi there tbrinkma ... Thanks for the comments .. The purpose of kickstarter is to help those who have an idea or concept that they have worked on and for the community to help that person to bring there project to life. It is the essence of entrepreneurship. But this is not anything new. Some of the most famous companies started like this. They simply built a concept and had a business plan to make it work. Steve Jobs and woz started building in the garage and so did Micheal Dell and the list goes on. Dune case is no different. We built a prototype and tested it and now it is ready for production. We spent the money and sacrificed time. We built a business plan and now we are ready to deliver. I hope that gives you a better understanding of what we are trying to do and I encourage anyone that has an idea to give it a try. I don't fear in Dune Case not getting funded because I believe it will succeed, I am afraid of not doing something I have always wanted to do.
Replying to my post without actually addressing any of the concerns in the post. I guess you're still trying to pretend that the elephant in the room is a house cat?
Hi tbrinkma .. thanks mate ... but I was simply addressing the issue of your last comment. You seemed concern that I am not able to deliver the project within deadlines and that ...." never seen anyone claim that it was in someone's best interest to pay money for *hope* before.."
I have mentioned many times on this forum that we do have an experienced team with track record to deliver. Kip kokinakis is the co-founder with 30 years experience in manufacturing and being the previous CEO of Aureal 3D audio and MyVu. We have a manufacturing partner that is more than capable. With that expertise and their judgement on the case of delivery we measured carefully what we could deliver. Please look into the background on those involved.
As said in my last comment we are using Kickstarter platform as it enables us to make this into a product. I suggest you look into kickstarter and see the projects that were prototypes that became a product because people believed in their concept and hope. Some good examples of "Hope" the community believes in, are Oculas Rift, Ouya, Pebble watch and the list goes on .. They all build concepts and asked the community to join together to help them make the prototype a reality. It is that same "hope" and determination in something new that changes the place we live in.
Thanks .. Alex
That's pretty damn blatant.
I don't think he's ever going to be frank and admit that he's promoting a blatant copy and rip off of an Apple product. I think he genuinely believes this is an original design and hasn't quite weighed up the consequences of poking a lion with a stick, as it were. If MacRumors makes a main page post about it being a blatant copy, it's a blatant copy. If I were him I'd bury this product quickly because Apple WILL notice if not already.
I find amusing the contradictions of finding this to be a "crap" case and finding the MacPro beautiful. If the MacPro is beautiful, then so is this case. The fact that we can then take a beautiful case and do more or different things with it than the MacPro allows is a great thing.