Just because you can't hear it, doesn't mean you can't feel it.Good thing they offer that 6 Hz range when the average human adult can only hear down to 20 Hz. The aluminum combined with extra batteries are sure to make this super comfortable to wear for those 55 hours.
Indeed... I bought a top of the line Dyson cordless vacuum cleaner... died after 10 usages, pain to get warranty support, actually very cheaply built... got a Xiaomi "clone" for less than half the price... much better design, put together well and functionally (which it still is) just as good as the 10 times the Dyson worked.Dyson is all about design.
And their design is always utterly kiddish.
Not sure how they manage to survive.
There's a lot of music and movies out there mastered for infrasonics and transmitted over Bluetooth 5.0, eh?Just because you can't hear it, doesn't mean you can't feel it.
Infrasonics is an important aspect of music and especially films
Does a wireless lossless codec exist? Does BT have the bandwidth for lossless?There is no mention of lossless capability 👈
Or, put differently, they don't blow.Now these I would buy - because they don’t suck.
No, Bluetooth does not do lossless. I think headphones that wirelessly do lossless use WiFi.Does a wireless lossless codec exist? Does BT have the bandwidth for lossless?
No. There are wireless headphones out now that do lossless (CD quality) over Bluetooth, but it requires a specific technology stack to achieve.No, Bluetooth does not do lossless. I think headphones that wirelessly do lossless use WiFi.
This is incredibly accurate.Dyson’s approach to design is actually a lot like Apple’s.
As is this.Dyson is all about design.And their design is always utterly kiddish.
You talking about these earphones or the Mac Studio? Because in both cases, the answer is yes.Do they make an annoying high-pitched whine like every other Dyson product?
Dysons sell well and are considered "top of the line" to people who have never tried any alternatives because they are pretty and they run well-produced ads featuring a charismatic spokesperson. Meanwhile boring brands like Shark get sold for half as much, outperform Dysons in nearly every way (except looks and maybe battery life), but aren't really all that pretty.They are the Apple of vacuums and hair design to most people I know.
There wasn’t.Headphones with an air purifying mask? How ridiculous. Though I suppose there's a target audience for that.
Just what I want to do, wear a vacuum cleaner on my head. 🤣Omg, these are ugly!