Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Dyson's New OnTrac Headphones Rival AirPods Max With 55-Hour Battery Life and Customization Options
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Almost half a kilo of metals on your head just to hear an extra 1% quality audio?
Compared to earbuds these days this equation just does not add up. Posers enjoy.
Compared to earbuds these days this equation just does not add up. Posers enjoy.
Yeah, one of the reasons I will never buy a Dyson product.
And also recently announced that they are cutting about 1,000 UK jobs.
Never buy a Dyson, not only is the guy a massive prick, but their products never last.
Get a Miele, if you hoover upstairs, you’ll find it will hoover downstairs as well. Much better product reliability.
I've never had an issue with reliability from Dyson, but unlike a lot of people in here, I am open to try new products. Thanks for the recommendation.
I'm not a sound engineer either, but you've raised an interesting question that's got me thinking.
I believe that noise cancelling works by creating an out-of-phase version of the noise which cancels out the external noise, since a signal and the equivalent out-of-phase signal cancel each other). In order to do this, the out-of-phase noise needs to be played at exactly the same time as the noise. If it's slightly delayed, then it won't cancel completely. This may be why Dyson is using such a high sampling rate for the noise.
People can bash them all they want, I'm going to hold reserve until I actually try them. I used to think Dyson vacuums were overpriced nonsense...then, one day I bought a Dyson vacuum on sale and never looked back after using it. Not to mention our household added one of those Dyson hairdryers...it isn't hype, it's a real engineering work of art that's incredibly quiet as well as efficient. The engineers they have working for the brand and the creations they come up with really are top notch. We've all seen the debacles that Apple has put out with their audio products, even when they should be stellar, so why is it so difficult for others to believe that Dyson can put out something amazing?
Makes sense to me, but then again I am a mere mortal and no engineer. Mind you, the headphones could have a buffer and delay the sound received by Bluetooth to match the lag in the active noise cancellation system. Anyway, this just seems like overkill to me.
Most important thing for me would be that I can make music on my Mac/iPad with Bluetooth headphones, and that means low latency. If anyone manages that, I'm buying it.
both correct (@wyrdness). In fact, bluetooth headphones are primarily buffer. Adequate forms of RAM are dirt cheap. Constant microwaves are not great right up in your skull holes. So the compromise has always been to buffer a batch of content at best effort, while microprocessor and pre-amp take microseconds to fiddle audio enhancements and separate noise+cancellation, so your audio content isn't ruined. Then the headphones keep up the struggle to collect the next buffer, fiddle, buffer, fiddle, buffer fiddle...
Noise cancelation is only partly reactive. It's also heavily sampling and rephase. It's a statistical game. A few microseconds of steady jet engine, human speech, air conditioning, road noise is easy to sample and replay on a loop, 180 degrees out of phase. Earphones don't always LISTEN+REACT; they conserve power by switching to SAMPLE+PREDICT. These systems system don't do well with unpredictable, sudden, or sharp noise.
You can really tell how bluetooth sucks for real-time streaming during movies, phone/conference calls. Real-time reactivity require way more power and needs a clearer signal path. Often, packet loss and workload make synch fall apart, and then device and earphones have to renegotiate to restart. This is especially noticeable in "true-wireless" earbuds when right and left get out of whack. That's the choppiness, clicks, buzzing and drops you hear (and others hear from you) on phone/conference calls; earphones CAN'T buffer, sample and counter-phase in true realtime - when they try, you pick up on it it sounds awful.
The higher sampling rate means noise cancellation can counter more of the worlds unpredictable noise, including all the gross meat-bag noises from inside your skull (breathing, heartbeat, bloodrush, blinking, swallowing, neck bones creaking, etc.). THIS is the difference between $50 ANC earphones in Walgreens, and $300+ ANC earphones from premium brands: RAM for buffering. Microphones and microprocessors for sampling. Microprocessors for DAC (digital analog converter). Power for all the chips. More power for big driver amps. And software to tie it all together.
I'm guessing you all who have mentioned Miele are from across the pond, because in America we don't call vacuums hoovers, unless they are a Hoover brand vacuum. Never heard of Miele, except my middle school librarian, Mrs. Miele.
Shame James Dyson is a t-WAT.
You wouldn't be to hear the difference between 256kbps AAC and lossless on either headphones anyway.
You wouldn't be to hear the difference between 256kbps AAC and lossless on either headphones anyway.