Why did an “Amazon” spokesperson have anything to say about this? (psst, I think that’s an error in the article)
Again?Why did an “Amazon” spokesperson have anything to say about this? (psst, I think that’s an error in the article)
Of course they did, but Ireland set the terms. If those terms were illegal the onus should be on Ireland, not Apple.
Why did an “Amazon” spokesperson have anything to say about this? (psst, I think that’s an error in the article)
the onus is on ireland to do things correctly.
ie collect the correct amount of tax.
Apple and Ireland are aligned on this issue. Apple has put several billion into escrow with Ireland to comply with the law as it is written under the dispute process. But EU is trying to extract $ from US taxpayers to pay for socialist and insolvent countries like France, Portugal, Greece, Italy and others.
Under current law any monies not paid to foreign tax authorities and repatriated to the US is taxed at the incremental rate to our rate. That's why Apple and everyone else parks money overseas. It's also why there is a huge push to reduce our rate to 20% and to have a lower repatriation rate around 10% or less.
cite:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/0/european-debt-crisis-not-just-greece-drowning-debt/
how would US taxpayers be paying for it ?????
You have absolutely no idea what the Brexit might mean for the UK. No access to Single Market. Under the hand, a lot of Europeans are not sad, that the British (with all their Extras) are leaving. The consequences are more severe for the UK (Access to the Single Market, Border NI/Ireland only to name two).
London will be unattractive as financial market, as all big bank need a European Banking license which you only get if your European HQ is within the EU...
The more taxes that are paid in Europe, the less the taxpayer has to pay in US when repatriating since our rates are higher and they have to pay the delta. That's how.how would US taxpayers be paying for it ?????
So in your world view, our wealth belongs to the state, and they decide how much we can keep for our own mundane selfish reasons. We will never agree on this.I pay taxes, so should they. If they don't, they're taking some money that doesn't belong to them, which I call stealing. But they're rich, so their theft is ok, they'll find an agreement. Poor people not paying taxes are treaten like criminals, so should they.
Go.. thermal.. nuclear!Lol can you begin to imagine what Steve Jobs would have said then?
A company has to comply with the rules of a region where it operates. Ireland is in the EU. Tough luck.
And the EU as a whole has lost a lot more from them.I don't think luck is relevant. People demanding that Apple pay up are giving a EU member a free pass regarding Ireland's responsibility in the matter. Perhaps at day's end Apple will sue Ireland to recover damages - who knows? Lets not forget Ireland has gained a lot vis a vis employment / taxes from whatever these deals were.
Hahahahahaha you’ve been reading your own press too much, none of that is true...
Bombardier: who you're gonna call?Hahahahahaha you’ve been reading your own press too much, none of that is true...
Huge international banks (working for one them) have already begun moving their European Business to the mainland (Frankfurt, Paris,Amsterdam).
If the negotiations between the EU and UK fail and there’s no deal, the UK will be treated exactly the same way like the US. And that will be a big problem for the UK as they import more than they export. Currently the UK still has access to the European Single Market.
But hey, it is not my problem. I should say thanks as I’m personally benefiting from it.
Bombardier: who you're gonna call?
And thus Brexit won.
Keep trying.Bombardier has absolutely nothing to do with Brexit??
Bombardier has absolutely nothing to do with Brexit??
That is how socialists and communists think. Welcome to Europe and Asia. It is also why they are economically irrelevant.So in your world view, our wealth belongs to the state, and they decide how much we can keep for our own mundane selfish reasons.
The problem is that you see the state as your enemy. I see it as the part of my life I necessarily have to share with people around me, so I have to give a percentage of my money to get streets, healthcare, police and other services. I'm glad to do it but I want it to be fair. It's ridiculous that people with much more money than me pay a smaller percentage, no matter my vision of the state. And since it is the place I live in and not Apple, rules shouldn't be made up to fool me.So in your world view, our wealth belongs to the state, and they decide how much we can keep for our own mundane selfish reasons. We will never agree on this.