Baig's comment defines the whole iPad concept: "Most will use the iPad for consuming content rather than creating it"
No matter how hard Jobs tries to sell the idea of working with "his" tablet because you can't work with it.
It is designed to function as an store at home for music, video and applications...
iPad might have an affordable price according to Jobs (I don't think so... I think it's very expensive for what you pay), but the truth is that iPad is just like nowadays' printers... the manufacturer gets money from the ink refills...
Just translate the word printer with iPad and ink with itunes/app-store
and you have the business model from Apple (no USB/Flash aren't there because they are things of the past, they aren't there because they are an uncontrolled source of content which Apple might not get a profit from...).
I don't think that many people who already paid for an iPad or are willing to do so, realize that iPad is nothing without putting more extra money into Jobs' pocket...
I wonder if Apple will convert its computing line to a subsidized one, like the iPod/iPad/iPhone... in a few years
No matter how hard Jobs tries to sell the idea of working with "his" tablet because you can't work with it.
It is designed to function as an store at home for music, video and applications...
iPad might have an affordable price according to Jobs (I don't think so... I think it's very expensive for what you pay), but the truth is that iPad is just like nowadays' printers... the manufacturer gets money from the ink refills...
Just translate the word printer with iPad and ink with itunes/app-store
I don't think that many people who already paid for an iPad or are willing to do so, realize that iPad is nothing without putting more extra money into Jobs' pocket...
I wonder if Apple will convert its computing line to a subsidized one, like the iPod/iPad/iPhone... in a few years