This article doesn't seem to make any point.
It wasn't supposed to....it is a corporate warfare article designed to cast a negative light on the iPad and Apple.
Mission Accomplished...the brain dead public drinks the Kook Aid.
This article doesn't seem to make any point.
I'm *way* too impatient to wait for 2nd gen, or rev B even of product. I look around my house and every single product I own was purchased the day it was released (pretty much). How sad am I?!
On the other hand I've had the opportunity to get the latest/newest product immediately and enjoy it the entire time others wait for rev B. I realise sometimes rev B has a few updated bits (which I envy hugely!), but I'm happiest having the first version of the product to enjoy, enjoy and enjoy.
Your attitude is one I envy, but what I'd really prefer is my attitude with so much money that I can buy v1 and every revision after!![]()
"I can't charge my huge iPad battery off my computer's low power USB port"
And the reason that the iPad comes its own charger/cable is??????
The average IQ in this country is shrinking as fast as polar ice.
![]()
I have heard it's heavier than most have thought. Anyone else think this?
It wasn't supposed to....it is a corporate warfare article designed to cast a negative light on the iPad and Apple.
Mission Accomplished...the brain dead public drinks the Kook Aid.
Yeah, who needs a wifi only internet device to be capable of reliably connecting to.....the internet. Well said.
Mmmm. "Kook [sic] Aid."
Does your toaster or microwave require a computer to set up and use? IF the iPad was a completely stand alone device I wouldn't have any problem with it only charging off the wall plug. But, since you already have to bring a computer around to manage the iPad the wall plug is now another thing to carry around.
I don't think anyone is saying that it doesn't need to connect to the internet. It's just that the particular news article in question appeared to not have much of anything to do with the headline. It didn't really reach any conclusion.
In contrast USB 2.0 High Power can only manage 12 volts and 1100mA and regular USB 1.1 and 2.0 can only muster 5v and 500mA.
It does charge over a standard usb port - just not while you're using the iPad. You can power the device for use, or charge it, but not both, if you are using a 500mA USB port. And the 1A USB charging port is also a "standard usb port."
Well yes, but everyone is used to charging their iPods and iPhones through the computer USB port and that's what they wanted to do. Of course, iPad is a much larger device and requires more power. Not exactly Apple's fault that the standard USB port delivers around 5W. They did include a 10W charger for a purpose.
Reboot into Windows 7 Professional (via BootCamp 3.1). Same USB port, same dock, same everything, nothing has changed. Simply reboot into Windows 7.
So, I don't know if I buy the whole "your not using a USB 2.0 port" argument. We are talking identical hardware here, just different OS.
Actually USB is only spec'ed to deliver around 2.5 Watts. It appears that Apples computers are able to send more power, but it is definitely not within USB spec.
This may be the same method they were using to power the external superdrive that the MBA has.
Please show me these 12v and 1000mA USB specs - I have the USB 2.0 and USB 3.0 specs open, and 2.0 says that USB High-power is 5 unit loads (500mA) at 5v. USB 3.0 sets high-power to 900mA at 5v. (Specs here: http://www.usb.org/developers/docs/) USB 3.0 has a special "powered B" connector spec that does 1000mA, but that's also at 5v.
Is it possible that Apple is using a non-standards compliant USB port, and it's drivers will allow a device to request more than 5 unit loads? The Win7 driver might limit things to 5 loads.
The MBA port is known to be non-standard and able to supply more than 500mA.
"the sole USB port has been boosted past its specifications to supply enough power to use the drive with just the data cable rather than a direct power connection"
http://www.electronista.com/articles/08/01/23/macbook.air.usb.details/
...A second issue experienced by users has been difficulty with charging the iPad via USB. A number of users have discovered that their iPads refuse to charge when connected to USB ports on some computers, an issue that Apple has stated is due to the required power draw for the device. In a support document posted on the issue, Apple recommends that users charge their iPads by using either the included power outlet adapter or high-power USB 2.0 ports...
This is just one of the reasons why you never buy a Rev A product.
Good luck to all of those who just couldn't wait to get this big ipod touch. Hopefully yours are okay.
Apple confirms iPad Wi-Fi issues, suggests fixes
Macworld was able to confirm that even all-Apple setups in which connectivity is provided by AirPort base stations are experiencing unexpected signal weakness and drops.
It's neither defective nor incorrectly advertised.That's my (and everyone else's) beef. If I owned the iPad and it had this problem with ANY of my computers (Mini and various PCs) I would return the iPad based on misleading advertising/defectiveness (however Apple wants to spin it).
, yesterday I received a class-action settlement check of $37.50 for the scratching issue on my 1st-gen Nano that I picked up on day 1.