There are competing products that already have this functionality, they’re mentioned in this thread. If it’s that important then you should buy one - NOW. No need to buy an Apple product at all, after all, they’re doomed and will be out of business in a few months.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
ECG Dilemma
- Thread starter chiefs1968
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
There are competing products that already have this functionality, they’re mentioned in this thread. If it’s that important then you should buy one - NOW. No need to buy an Apple product at all, after all, they’re doomed and will be out of business in a few months.
Whoa there! Did I say I would like it if they missed their own deadline? No. I said I hate when people use lawsuits as the answer to everything. You and your friends here are castigating Apple for something they haven't even done yet. You've convicted them already. If you want to know, I think that's childish and priggish as h*ll.
I'm done with this thread. I'm also done with people who think everything revolves around them. If you can't read and understand plain English then too bad.
What is your obsession with class action lawsuits in the US? They don't even make you rich. The only people who'd be cashing in the checks are the lawyers while people losing money would be Apple execs when you'd be given pennies for all the time you invest in.
I find it odd that anyone would believe that they could sue in court for a non-binding statement. Maybe they work for Definers?
Old adage.... "Follow the money". Everyone's out to make a free buck.. As the dude said, "Patience, Grasshopper, Patience". Funny, how people have spent upwards of $400 for a watch, "Solely for the ECG Function", when Amazon sells 3rd party devices for as little as $69. Those are available now. Why drop $400 for something when you can get it for $70, unless it's just so they can have a bitch? Some people's children.
Those statements are not going to be viewed by anyone as "non-binding," if what you mean is insulated from liability in the event that Apple doesn't deliver within the specified timeframe. Not, as some here seem to think, two months or one month or even a week before the end of the year. But on the other hand, there are two very specific promises that have been made, and Apple will have to accept liability for those if they fail to do what they've promised (twice) to do.
This all appears to be pointless speculation, however, at least assuming the information MR reported this week is true.
And at the end of the day, Apple will do whatever Apple does, and no amount of posting here will change that at all.
Hey! Guess what! It’s “later this year” day!
The world is still spinning too!
The world is still spinning too!