A 10% failure rate straight away (before you even consider false positives/negatives) seems wildly inaccurate as a medical device to me.
Surly a company with billions and billions of dollars, the life-saving stories that will appear when the feature is available elsewhere, and a large outcry from the UK citizens will speed up the approval process.
This timeline is absurdly long. When I asked Health Canada on twitter they said that for a device like that they could approve an application very quickly, as quickly as 15 days. No reason why it should take years in UK.
As someone else here stated, these regulatory bodies do not want patients using this information for self diagnosis to then go and waste very very tight resources in their specific regions, especially the UK, which there are waiting lists months and months long to just see a doctor.
Exactly. Apple Watch has already saved lives and improved the health of countless people.I feel sorry for all the future heart attack victims who will be wearing an Apple Watch series 4 with that feature still disabled.
This came out ages ago as well"The Series 4 is the first ECG product being offered over the counter directly to consumers."
Well I guess other than the AliveCor which has been OTC approved for human use for years:
https://www.amazon.com/Alivecor-Kar...=UTF8&qid=1538055836&sr=8-3&keywords=alivecor
And for those who are disparaging a single lead EKG, (IAAD) I use single lead EKGs in the hospital all the time (Telemetry) and when were are doing a cardiac arrest resuscitation we use single leads (The Defib/Monitor will synthesize the other leads, but you really only need one lead) to decide the rhythm; heck your implanted defibrillators really only have one lead (both logically and physically) since the case is the ground. There is some information lost without the 2D (6 lead) or 3D information (12-lead) but not for rhythm detection. The purpose of this EKG is NOT to check for ischemia which does require more leads. The lack of axis information is rarely a limitation on most EKG tasks. Now of course to differentiate afib with abberency vs. V-tach requires the precordial leads to check for concordance, but if you aren't already in the ER, using any home consumer device seems a good way to be found dead on your kitchen floor!
"The Series 4 is the first ECG product being offered over the counter directly to consumers."
Well I guess other than the AliveCor which has been OTC approved for human use for years:
https://www.amazon.com/Alivecor-Kar...=UTF8&qid=1538055836&sr=8-3&keywords=alivecor
And for those who are disparaging a single lead EKG, (IAAD) I use single lead EKGs in the hospital all the time (Telemetry) and when were are doing a cardiac arrest resuscitation we use single leads (The Defib/Monitor will synthesize the other leads, but you really only need one lead) to decide the rhythm; heck your implanted defibrillators really only have one lead (both logically and physically) since the case is the ground. There is some information lost without the 2D (6 lead) or 3D information (12-lead) but not for rhythm detection. The purpose of this EKG is NOT to check for ischemia which does require more leads. The lack of axis information is rarely a limitation on most EKG tasks. Now of course to differentiate afib with abberency vs. V-tach requires the precordial leads to check for concordance, but if you aren't already in the ER, using any home consumer device seems a good way to be found dead on your kitchen floor!
No, the rules are such that the risk that somebody could disregard the disclaimers is considered not acceptable. The regulators take no chances with this. If it says EKG on the tin, the authorities want to be absolutely sure that that is what is actually inside.Maybe being dim here - but could they not just have massive disclaimers saying the readings aren't regulated/approved and are advisory only? See a doctor etc.
Maybe being dim here - but could they not just have massive disclaimers saying the readings aren't regulated/approved and are advisory only? See a doctor etc.
"The Series 4 is the first ECG product being offered over the counter directly to consumers."
Well I guess other than the AliveCor which has been OTC approved for human use for years:
https://www.amazon.com/Alivecor-Kar...=UTF8&qid=1538055836&sr=8-3&keywords=alivecor
And for those who are disparaging a single lead EKG, (IAAD) I use single lead EKGs in the hospital all the time (Telemetry) and when were are doing a cardiac arrest resuscitation we use single leads (The Defib/Monitor will synthesize the other leads, but you really only need one lead) to decide the rhythm; heck your implanted defibrillators really only have one lead (both logically and physically) since the case is the ground. There is some information lost without the 2D (6 lead) or 3D information (12-lead) but not for rhythm detection. The purpose of this EKG is NOT to check for ischemia which does require more leads. The lack of axis information is rarely a limitation on most EKG tasks. Now of course to differentiate afib with abberency vs. V-tach requires the precordial leads to check for concordance, but if you aren't already in the ER, using any home consumer device seems a good way to be found dead on your kitchen floor!
This came out ages ago as well
https://www.gizchina.com/2017/06/27/xiaomi-amazfit-health-band-review/
When it’s works in the UK, I’ll upgrade from my Nike Series 2.
![]()
"The Series 4 is the first ECG product being offered over the counter directly to consumers."
Well I guess other than the AliveCor which has been OTC approved for human use for years:
https://www.amazon.com/Alivecor-Kar...=UTF8&qid=1538055836&sr=8-3&keywords=alivecor
And for those who are disparaging a single lead EKG, (IAAD) I use single lead EKGs in the hospital all the time (Telemetry) and when were are doing a cardiac arrest resuscitation we use single leads (The Defib/Monitor will synthesize the other leads, but you really only need one lead) to decide the rhythm; heck your implanted defibrillators really only have one lead (both logically and physically) since the case is the ground. There is some information lost without the 2D (6 lead) or 3D information (12-lead) but not for rhythm detection. The purpose of this EKG is NOT to check for ischemia which does require more leads. The lack of axis information is rarely a limitation on most EKG tasks. Now of course to differentiate afib with abberency vs. V-tach requires the precordial leads to check for concordance, but if you aren't already in the ER, using any home consumer device seems a good way to be found dead on your kitchen floor!
Things are simply more laissez-faire in North America. In Europe, the government just has different standards when it comes to avoiding any risk of customers being taken for a ride or even merely given potentially inaccurate information in medical matters.This timeline is absurdly long. When I asked Health Canada on twitter they said that for a device like that they could approve an application very quickly, as quickly as 15 days. No reason why it should take years in UK.
alivekor just got approval. not years ago. I know, because I wanted to get one, but couldn't
Also have to consider sensor strength. ER sensors pull from 120VAC, and can easily detect 10mV signals. A 1.12 watt-hour battery on the other hand has reduced capabilities. Hence my gimmick stance, and confusion as to why its considered a medical device.Out of interest, do you attach your single lead EKG to the patient's wrist? And is the use of a single lead influenced by being in an emergency resuscitation scenario?