That’s stupid. Might as well not edit it at all. It’s like the silly message in outlook „the sender would like to take back the message you just read“
Then delete the entire idea/feature. What’s the point.yeah legal reasons is the only possible logic around it
If I text you and say "don't go to school tomorrow I am shooting it up" and then I edit it to say "Hi". It is hard to go to the police with a threat when all you have is a message that says "Hi".Why should someone be able to see the edits? I changed it so you wouldn't see what I typed.
Because Privacy™.Why should someone be able to see the edits? I changed it so you wouldn't see what I typed.
Think of abusive partners/coworkers/parents.Why should someone be able to see the edits? I changed it so you wouldn't see what I typed.
It's only viewable if you click to see it, it's not there the whole time.Soo... I don't get it. What is the point of this feature then? I keep seeing people saying "to fix typos" but how are you fixing them if the original typo is still viewable? How does that change literally anything?
nah this will work well for its intended purposeThen delete the entire idea/feature. What’s the point.
I can just send another text as I do now to correct something I typed before. Haha
I understand it being visible to the sender, but not the recipient.
But I think this change might be due to legal reasons. I could see people abusing it.
Apple needs to take lessons from Whatsup App and Discord Period 🙌Apple current UX at it's finest 🤣
intended purpose as in we all love to see our contact edits.. because Apple?nah this will work well for its intended purpose
Sometimes Siri will auto correct too much or if using dictation. It’s definitely needed.As a matter of principle I won't edit anything but things that are horrible misspelt to the point of not understandable or auto corrected to another word completely unrelated
Otherwise won't be bother.d
Good on showing edits and narrowing time to undo. Both are preventing social issues from bubbling up. Even then I think maybe 60 seconds should be un-do. 30 seconds even,
I get what you're saying (and I DO agree), but the implementation of doing it this way...is no different than sending the correction with (or without) an *. If the original is going to be there anyway, the edit feature really doesn't serve a purpose. They could remove the edit feature entirely and it really wouldn't change anything in terms of how amending/fixing works.Pointless? The point of editing isn't to hide what you wrote. It's to add on or amend/fix the message. These changes don't stop that. The only people who should care about this change are people who are trying to hide what they initially said. Since people on iOS 15 can't see edits anyway this was never truly hidden.
But it is different. The edit history is hidden until the recipient specifically taps on it to view. Unlike a separate unhideable new message with a *. Less clutter.I get what you're saying (and I DO agree), but the implementation of doing it this way...is no different than sending the correction with (or without) an *. If the original is going to be there anyway, the edit feature really doesn't serve a purpose. They could remove the edit feature entirely and it really wouldn't change anything in terms of how amending/fixing works.
Couldn't they send it and then delete it less than two minutes later?It’s quite simple, I present one scenario: Say someone sent threatening or harassing messages (perhaps to a spouse or former partner) and then edited them to say “I like snuggle fabric softener”. It would be a convenient way to skirt restraining orders or intimidate/harass/threaten without the recipient being able to prove it.
While some will use this feature for banal and reasonable reasons there will be a subset who will look for ways to exploit it for personal gain or to harm another.
I would guess it's to allow the option to clarify a message; ensuring typos, a hastily chosen word, or any other aspect of the original text doesn't get in the way of the intended meaning.So why edit it?