Elon, can you also please buy TikTok and shut it down?
And Facebook! Don't forget Facebook.
Elon, can you also please buy TikTok and shut it down?
If Twitter is the town square
Where do you draw the line of threading violence?Here’s how it should go: Everyone gets to speak as long as it’s not threatening violence or openly encouraging it. And no, words that upset you are not violence. If you don’t like the words, don’t read them.
I hope Musk cleans all that up pronto.
Why and on what grounds?Ugh. Well that sucks.
Not sure what tools regulators have at their disposal in this instance but here's to hoping they step in.
Agreed- the far left are dangerous too.Exactly right.
It's not about specific political alliances of users, but rather the content some are absorbing up and pushing
(I have this exact view about traditional very far left whack-a-doo anti-vax stuff as well)
I hope things go into a positive direction, but realistically I'd say not very much will or can change in this regard.Give me a break. It’s conservatives who have been censored on Twitter and all over democrat-run social media.
Everything went online starting in the 2000s, including the biggest opportunities for expression. But the tools for that expression have been run exclusively by leftwing, progressive nuts, who have actively tried to suppress any viewpoint they strongly disagree with or that might hurt their chances of seeing their political candidates win elections. That’s why Twitter suppressed the truthful story about Hunter Biden’s laptop. And why Facebook wouldn’t let anyone say anything in defense of Kyle Rittenhouse before the trial (though they were allowed to disparage him). And why Social media was rife with posts constantly undermining Trumps legitimate election with ridiculous talk about him being a Russian agent but Trump couldn’t suggest the 2020 election was illegitimate. Meanwhile rising stars of the Democratic Party like Stacey Abrams speak freely about losing due to election fraud and refuse to concede.
In other words, you can say it if it benefits progressives. You can’t say it if it harms their narratives.
Here’s how it should go: Everyone gets to speak as long as it’s not threatening violence or openly encouraging it. And no, words that upset you are not violence. If you don’t like the words, don’t read them.
I hope Musk cleans all that up pronto.
Lol..Your post will be moderated away shortly, but I wanted to chip in first. Conservatives aren't silenced for dissenting views- it just happens that the last few years there's been a wave of disinformation that some conservatives have bought into, fuelled by a conservative president who had a peculiar relationship with the truth.
Lol..
Exactly why Twitter needs to be taken private. "Your post will be moderated away shortly"
Free speech is about allowing people to speak their opinion. If you don't agree with the opinion, voice your opinion, it doesn't mean eliminate their opinion from discussion.
Elon Musk believes Twitter is, in fact, a town square. Given the size and reach of twitter, and the fact that there are no "town squares" anymore in the modern age where information is disseminated and exchanged -- especially political discussion -- I agree with him (and I am not an Elon Musk fan at all). On this issue, I believe him to be correct and it would mean that the 1st Amendment would effectively govern Twitter -- imagine that happening in in the good old USA! Net net -- this is a great development. People should not fear the free flow of information as the first amendment law has served the country quite well since the founding.It isn't
It's a private company
And you don't want them in the business of deciding who is "legitimate" to the point of collecting real world information about you to decide -- and then doing god knows what with that information
I think people are just scared and they don't know what's yet to come in the future.It's funny how people take sides without knowing what will happen.
Have you… ever looked up the history of TSLA short sellers?I'm following Bill Gate's lead. I have been shorting the stuffing out of TSLA. I suggest all of you do the same. This is beyond easy money. This is like finding it in your wallet. TWTR will fail, as he has already stated he plans to take it private. Bye Bye, from an investment standpoint. Make TSLA pay for it.
Elon Musk believes Twitter is, in fact, a town square.
Given the size and reach of twitter,
"He has secured $25.5bn of financing for the deal and will take a $21bn stake in the business."
![]()
Elon Musk strikes deal to buy Twitter for $44bn
Mr Musk, who made the shock bid just over a week ago, said he would "unlock" the social media firm's potential.www.bbc.co.uk
Reports emerged over the weekend indicating that Twitter’s board had become more open to deal discussions, and the company ultimately accepted Musk’s offer at its original price. Musk said late last week that he had lined up deal funding, including $25.5 billion of debt commitments from Morgan Stanley and other financial institutions. He also offered an equity-commitment letter saying that he was prepared to kick in the remaining amount, equating to roughly $21 billion.
On this issue, I believe him to be correct and it would mean that the 1st Amendment would effectively govern Twitter
Well...it's not bad news for everyone!
You can go to a lot of weird meditation retreats with a fresh billion in hand!
Reading this was like trying to outrun a roller coaster.Elon Musk believes Twitter is, in fact, a town square. Given the size and reach of twitter, and the fact that there are no "town squares" anymore in the modern age where information is disseminated and exchanged -- especially political discussion -- I agree with him (and I am not an Elon Musk fan at all). On this issue, I believe him to be correct and it would mean that the 1st Amendment would effectively govern Twitter -- imagine that happening in in the good old USA! Net net -- this is a great development. People should not fear the free flow of information as the first amendment law has served the country quite well since the founding.
What he believes does actually make a difference (irrespective of congressional action that is moving in that direction) because he can willing make Twitter comply with first amendment law and precedent. Let's call it a perk of ownership.He can "believe" whatever he wants -- the doesn't make it so.
What if it's Ukrainians saying that they will shoot invading Russian soldiers? Posting a picture of Ukrainian citizens making Molotov cocktails?Here’s how it should go: Everyone gets to speak as long as it’s not threatening violence or openly encouraging it. And no, words that upset you are not violence. If you don’t like the words, don’t read them.
I hope Musk cleans all that up pronto.
No idea what you mean?? Do you feel threatened or overwhelmed?Reading this was like trying to outrun a roller coaster.