Where are my Elon Stans? Show yourselves. Give me the spin how this is a good feature? King of all trolls continues to troll
Wow, what a wrong take. Making it hard for them by blocking them is better than just ignoring the problem. Most of these bullies will just go away harder for them to harass. If they get another account, block that one... and the next ... and the next... until they get tired and go away
The people saying mute is the same seem completely ignorant to how social networks actually work..
It’s not even close. If someone is ****** to me I don’t want them interacting with my followers on my posts. People can harass without just targeting the person blocking them. If someone’s trolling all your posts, you need to be able to *stop* them, not just ignore them. The whole point of Twitter and Facebook is you have *your* space there, which most users consider themselves partially responsible for the curation of. If you can’t make your posts safe for your followers, you have a dysfunctional social network, and people will continue to leave.
Brand accounts must hate this idea too.. nobody other than trolls’ experience would actually be improved by removing block.
This will make X close to unusable for anyone who talks about things likely to get them targeted by hate mobs, or even just rogue creepy weirdos.
It is funny to see the downward spiral though… I left a while back.
Making murder illegal doesn’t make it impossible to murder someone — and even get away with it sometimes — so let’s just legalize it, then. Sounds great.Many do. Therefore, problem is not solved by blocking.
Making murder illegal doesn’t make it impossible to murder someone — and even get away with it sometimes — so let’s just legalize it, then. Sounds great.
Wow. Sounds like a great platform. Who wouldn't want to sign-up for this... 😶Actually it makes it funnier and more enjoyable for the troll to frustrate you on X using multiple accounts. While you think you may have won after thinking they got tired, they've enjoyed making you angry. Quite often they would post to have the last say and then mute you. They put you out of their mind while you were probably wasting your time on earth angrily blocking yet another account.
Mute doesn't give them that satisfaction. "The best revenge is living well" - Ricky Gervais
Agree to disagree. Have a good one!
Wow. Sounds like a great platform. Who wouldn't want to sign-up for this... 😶
ps. The poet George Herbert said that long before Ricky did.
You’ve told on yourself a lot here between this, the supposed dozens of Twitter accounts in your password manager, and your relentless defense of the possible removal of a feature that is objectively beneficial for privacy and safety. That’s to say it sounds like you have plenty of experience getting blocked and you relish driving people to that point. I’m glad I have better things to do.Zero risk trolling someone on X.
Do people actuallly read about an issue before making tnese statements? The Mute feature accomplishes exactly what you say.That is crazy, so the abuser will keep tagging and messaging other users? This makes no sense, best to quit this X app. Be done with it.
The general public won't know the truthInitiator: some statement that is a big fat lie
Responses from many people (blocked):That's a lie and here are the facts and references
Responses from other people (not blocked): I believe you just because we are in the same bubble
"X: The Solar System's #1 Source for Ivermectin and Alex Jones supplements!"Companies are already on board with X support via DMs and X marketing. Considering the large user base, it's not long until companies start allowing purchasing of goods and services inside X especially when you include it within the advertised post.
Users are spending money on X premium/subscriptions. Users are getting paid by X. All the cards are in place. Not difficult to see.
Regardless, the argument was all in one apps are a thing because of gov controlling internet in that region. Japan is an example of showing that's not entirely true. You're changing the argument to "all in one apps are popular because they had a head start". Different argument.
Engagement is increasing based off of who's figures? Cause if they're Elon's I doubt they're accurate 😂Don't like it, don't use it...? Plenty of alternatives.
Meanwhile, engagement seems to be increasing since Elon bought it.
And I'm sure someone else did before that in some other language. We're not going down that blackhole.
Muting filters incoming media. Blocking controls outgoing media. Muting and blocking are two different things. If they take away blocking, you could mute someone, but they could still take your media and run amok with it. Blocking is integral to protecting people from people.I did. Did you?
"According to Musk, muting will be the sole way to filter content on Twitter in the future,"
And I agree. Mute. Very simple.
Alex Jones is still banned from X, FYI."X: The Solar System's #1 Source for Ivermectin and Alex Jones supplements!"
Engagement is increasing based off of who's figures? Cause if they're Elon's I doubt they're accurate 😂
Muting and blocking are two different things.
So you think blocking is not necessary? I'm trying to understand your perspective.I'm well aware of what they do. I stand by what I said.
People are not entitled to free speech on a privately owned platform. Period. Open debate and conversation are things that platforms can strive for, but so long as there’s a profit motive speech will never be truly free and any claim otherwise is *********.does help with free (not hate) speech
The general public seeking “truth” in any way, shape, or form from social media platforms is the root of a lot of societal problems. At best it’s a jumping-off point for further investigation.The general public won't know the truth
I think blocking didn't do its job considering it's very easy to switch accounts and continue trolling as before. You can also buy tens to hundreds of twitter accounts with legitimate history and content with bitcoin. It infact encourages trolls to continue trolling as they enjoy the chaos it causes.So you think blocking is not necessary? I'm trying to understand your perspective.
I'm arguing that it's not useful. Personally if I was CTO, I'd have the engineers work on something more important. But fighting to keep it is something I'm not going to advocate for.I'm not sure why you are arguing so hard against the idea of a block.
Is it perfect? No, of course not. But it clearly has its uses,
and is clearly different than mute.
I have a very specific use for block on some apps, and none of your arguments has any merit on the usefulness of the feature for me.
Thou doth protest too much.
You can't "agree to disagree" on the usefulness of the feature TO ME. I have reasons that you simply don't understand. So, your "disagreement" is pointless.
If it’s not useful, why has it existed in the first place ? Clearly both Block and Mute have their uses and that’s why both features exist. If you don’t find it useful, it’s fine just don’t use it. But some other people do find it useful, so there’s no reason to take it away in my opinion.I'm arguing that it's not useful. Personally if I was CTO, I'd have the engineers work on something more important. But fighting to keep it is something I'm not going to advocate for.