Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
To be fair, I don’t know for certain what is going on in other people’s heads. But it seems to me that is the whole reason they are upset - that Twitter will no longer function as an instrument of the DNC.

No one has ever claimed that Twitter functioned as part of the DNC. Case in point: how much Trump governed by tweet from 2016 to 2020. But everyone on your side of that argument seems to have forgotten that.

BL.
 
Oh, you mean something that has been panned as overhyped and misleading?


Yeah, by all means, post Musk's inaneness. I'm pretty sure that laptop pics of a private citizen will rank right up there for corruption so grave that Trump is wanting to completely destroy all articles in the Constitution and be "installed" as POTUS. Let's have all of this out for the world to see so it shows how embarrassing this situation is; not just embarrassing for Musk, but just as embarrassing for those who worship him as if he is a cult of personality, as it will show how far gone in lacking their own rational thought they truly are.

BL.
Respectfully, it seems that you are engaged in water carrying for “your side” right now. There’s nothing rational about defending the suppression of a legitimate news story in the weeks leading to a presidential election.
 
The missing point here: your side of this argument are going on about "freedom of speech" at a private company, in which the final authority over what is designated as "free speech" is the owner of the company, who has a slighted/biased view of what "freedom of speech" is, and can't even practice it himself.

Case in point of that lack of practice: suspending Kanye West. And yet when called out by it, your side of this argument ignores it with plugged ears and heads in the sand. One can't fully be about "freedom of speech" when being hypocritical and duplicitous with West. It causes your argument to lack complete merit.

BL.

It is very amusing to see conservatives latch on to this supposed outrage that a social media company was biased in favor of Dems. I wonder why that same outrage isn't directed as Fox "News", a media company clearly biased in favor of Republicans. Curious double-standard. When they do it, it's all about being fair and balanced, but when someone else does it, it's pearl clutching time.
 

Sure a company can do whatever it wants, but this isn't a good look. I wonder what part 2, 3, 4 will unveil.
The fact that this is posted on twitter in an excruciatingly long list of tweets, the worst medium I can imagine to release this on, makes it clear this is all for the media buzz and twitter attention. You know, instead of presenting facts and having a healthy discussion.
 
I would support Musk over Tim/Apple any day. Did you see how fast people jumped on the bandwagon to attack Musk on here? Even Macrumors did an attack story on Musk to support Apple. I'll hate Musk when he gives me a reason, till then, I'll just hate on Tim's obsession of Dongles.
 
It is very amusing to see conservatives latch on to this supposed outrage that a social media company was biased in favor of Dems. I wonder why that same outrage isn't directed as Fox "News", a media company clearly biased in favor of Republicans. Curious double-standard. When they do it, it's all about being fair and balanced, but when someone else does it, it's pearl clutching time.
Yes, the very last thing Democrats would ever do is to display outrage towards Fox News.

I mean, besides AOC claiming (without evidence) that Fox is trying to get her killed every few weeks.

And besides all of the calls to censor and cancel the network, have it removed from cable carriers and its on-air talent fired.

But yes, besides all of that non-stop outrage, I also wonder why outrage isn’t directed at Fox.
 
I don’t get what’s actually a problem? There’s the social network called Twitter with some management team, rules, etc. It earns money from ads among other ways. There’s Apple, huge company with a huge load of money. It advertises its products on Twitter. One day Mask (not a pleasant and sinful person in many aspects by default - I could use only two offensive words here but with the risk to be banned) buys Twitter and starts to spread his mess on it. Apple may have its own artitude to the situation and decides to stop advertising there. Twitter stops getting a lot of money from Apple because of Musk - (here go two offensive words). Free speech? Oh really? What about “Kwa-kwa-kwanye” West? I heard he was banned recently. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t support that delirium and don’t like that pathetic person, but it seems this free speech is broken, please bring another one.
 
I don’t get what’s actually a problem? There’s the social network called Twitter with some management team, rules, etc. It earns money from ads among other ways. There’s Apple, huge company with a huge load of money. It advertises its products on Twitter. One day Mask (not a pleasant and sinful person in many aspects by default - I could use only two offensive words here but with the risk to be banned) buys Twitter and starts to spread his mess on it. Apple may have its own artitude to the situation and decides to stop advertising there. Twitter stops getting a lot of money from Apple because of Musk - (here go two offensive words). Free speech? Oh really? What about “Kwa-kwa-kwanye” West? I heard he was banned recently. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t support that delirium and don’t like that pathetic person, but it seems this free speech is broken, please bring another one.
Kanye West violated the rules and is clearly a very broken and troubled man who is in desperate need of professional help.
 
The missing point here: your side of this argument are going on about "freedom of speech" at a private company, in which the final authority over what is designated as "free speech" is the owner of the company, who has a slighted/biased view of what "freedom of speech" is, and can't even practice it himself.

Case in point of that lack of practice: suspending Kanye West. And yet when called out by it, your side of this argument ignores it with plugged ears and heads in the sand. One can't fully be about "freedom of speech" when being hypocritical and duplicitous with West. It causes your argument to lack complete merit.

BL.

Let's not forget that election interference on behalf of DNC politicians is not the same thing as banning Kanye West.

I can see why people could interpret Kanye's post as incitement of violence, but I don't personally agree that it was, and don't agree that he should have been banned. He should shut up, get mental help, and people should stop pointing cameras at him.

But just because we both evidently disagree with Twitter's interpretation of the incitement of violence rule in Kanye's case, doesn't mean it's not completely abhorrent that Twitter used to act as a propaganda and censorship arm for the DNC. And I don't think we should use whataboutism to distract from that.
 
Apple should have invested that 100 million to get rid of all the bugs in their OS versions.
 
The fact that this is posted on twitter in an excruciatingly long list of tweets, the worst medium I can imagine to release this on, makes it clear this is all for the media buzz and twitter attention. You know, instead of presenting facts and having a healthy discussion.
Whether you disagree if this story matters or not, it would be ridiculous for Musk to post this anywhere else if he actually believes the contents of it. This is literally about censorship in mainstream media. To then trust the same mainstream media that according to him instigated the suppression of the story in question would be very naive. And looking at the media reaction to this incident, which reaches from utter ignorance to even active belittlement of the relevance of the story (which by the way, is from a perspective of journalistic ethics a despicable thing to do), I'm pretty sure he was correct with his assessment.
 
The fact that you think "freedom of speech" is "balcony"(I assume you autocorrect got you here), shows how truly ignorant you are.

What is currently going on in China, the strangle hold the Russian government has on the information it citizens receive, Canada's treatment of people voicing their displeasure, are just some recent examples. The pendulum is already swinging the opposite way and you wouldn't be so anti-freespeech if conservatives were shutting liberal views down.
Wrong. I did not say free speech is balcony. Free speech is paramount. I said “free speech” is being misused By people like Elon. Spreading misinformation, lies, and hate under the guise of free speech is “truly ignorant”. Misinformation, lies, and hate attack freedoms.
 
  • Love
Reactions: hagar
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.