This may be easier -and quicker- if we were able to have multiple leaders.
Raven, do we have to wait for mscriv? Or can we have someone else give orders?
i think this could be a great idea to get the game moving faster.
right now we are going as a group and are fairly in sync as far as decisions. in some cases the decision is obvious but it drags because everyone has to formally chime in and, after that, mscriv still has to put in the official bolded move.
ravenvii, can we elect to have no formal leader, but whenever anyone in the group feels that a majority consensus has been reached can just give the order?
technically, it would work like this:
the adventurers can work in two modes: a 'leader' mode, where every official decision is filtered through a leader (like now), and a 'freeflow' mode, where there is no leader.
in 'freeflow' mode, we still move as a group, but anyone, at anytime, can take the decision for everybody else, by just bolding the next move.
'freeflow' must be voted for/agreed upon as if it was a leader, and at any time the members can vote to go back to 'leader' mode, if some of the freeflow decisions become controversial.
just in case, i vote to go freeflow, and/or to go upstairs right away
pros and cons:
the pro is that it would be much faster as an implied consensus would be the same as a formal one, and there is no delay if the leader is temporarily busy.
the main con I see is that one of the members could rush a move or force everyone to do something they didn't agree upon (note that this can already occur, but only at the hands of the group leader)
- just in case, i vote to go freeflow, and/or to go upstairs right away
updated first floor map with putative 'missing rooms'