iPhone may still sell a lot because there's a shiny Apple logo on it.
As much as I'd like to agree with you and that picture, especially since I have the Galaxy S II, iOS is still a more stable and fluid OS. And the SII feels cheap, not flimsy, but the plastic doesn't give off a premium feel. Also, even though it has a very powerful processor, it still doesn't feel as fluid when web browsing and scrolling in general, but I think this is more of a "problem" with Android in general.
It's people like you that don't realize that popular brand names have a reputation with good products. I don't see people buying everything with a windows logo on it.![]()
Funny thing is, the Titan has the worst specs on paper and WP7 still has the most fluid experienceIt's all about optimization I guess
People like me research their products before buying it. I have tried BB, Android, and WP7 before and they don't work for me based on my needs. However, a lot of people do buy the iPhone mainly because it's an Apple product, believe it or not.
That's my point though, it's all based on reputation. I do research too and though the iPhone's specs may not be up to par with other phones, the combination of hardware and software "agreement" makes it a fluid device.
Outdated only if you look at it from a pure hardware spec perspective (I'm not even going to talk about design, for which Apple is years ahead). As an iPhone user, you should know that an iPhone is much more than just the hardware.
So is the iPhone RAM still unknown?
I thought it was 1 GB?
I'm not trying to defend the 4S but this chart has 3 rows that have an "Unknown" listed for the 4S.
i thought a "spec bump" wasn't good enough and it had to be "innovation" but then you post a picture all about specs.