I'm sure you are right and one of the requirements, is the final product can't be user repairable.Big difference between showing a concept to delivering a full fledged product. I am pretty sure Apple does lot more prototyping than YouTubers.
I'm sure you are right and one of the requirements, is the final product can't be user repairable.Big difference between showing a concept to delivering a full fledged product. I am pretty sure Apple does lot more prototyping than YouTubers.
So what? Disposable does not mean they go in the garbage. Every single material in them is recyclable, and will be used to make more AirPods cases.
But, but, they reduced the size of the brochures inside the case! Woohoo! Go green!It's not that Apple doesn't have the talent to create serviceable AirPods. Apple doesn't want them to be because that means less repeat sales after the batteries wear out in 1-2 years.
They can advertise it as "recyclable" (great PR) but what percentage of them get returned, cracked opened, and all components properly dealt with? And what additional resources are consumed to do that?So what? Disposable does not mean they go in the garbage. Every single material in them is recyclable, and will be used to make more AirPods cases.
Never said Apple doesn’t use USB C. I wouldn’t be surprised if Covid supply chain issues delayed the set up of production lines at scale. Beats line already uses USB C but they don’t sell as much as AirPods. I can see Apple setting up at mass scale for IPhone USBC first and then roll to AirPods.Yes apple uses the USB-C port in products since 2015 (MB 12“, later MBP, now all ipads). so this is not about manufacturing, its their policy.
Why do you think a USBC port any different to integrate than a lightning port?
they get good money from 3rd parties using lightning accessories. Thats the reason why they don’t switch
You actually think Apple lacks the know-how of getting USB-C on the Airpods?Seriously Apple, hire these people. Third parties and student engineers and programmers are doing a better job than you are at this point.
Comes with compactness. Gone are those days you could repair TVs, most appliances. It’s cheaper to replace than go through expensive repairs.I'm sure you are right and one of the requirements, is the final product can't be user repairable.
Considering the fact the beats buds already come with USB C. But the case is lot bigger and uglier.You actually think Apple lacks the know-how of getting USB-C on the Airpods?
That's ******** though. The Surface pen has replaceable batteries (the traditional AAA ones even, not lithium ones), and the size is comparable to an Apple Pencil.Comes with compactness. Gone are those days you could repair TVs, most appliances. It’s cheaper to replace than go through expensive repairs.
No way you can put a AAA in Apple Pencil I use with my iPad Pro. The AAA is thicker than the pencil.That's ******** though. The Surface pen has replaceable batteries (the traditional AAA ones even, not lithium ones), and the size is comparable to an Apple Pencil.
Of course more compact devices are HARDER to repair, but it doesn't mean they have to be impossible to repair!
No way you can put a AAA in Apple Pencil I use with my iPad Pro. The AAA is thicker than the pencil.
Apple is not microsoft, if replacable battery is the deal breaker or repairability, Microsoft is better bet.Technically, you are correct. The Apple pencil 2 has a diameter of 8.9 mm, whereas an AAA battery has a width of 10.5 mm. So, Modifying the Apple pencil to use a regular AAA battery would MAYBE add 2-3 millimeters to the Apple Pencil.
I personally think it's not that much, but...
SUPPOSE you REALLY want a slimmer pen. Instead of using an AAA battery, you could use 1-2 AAAA batteries, which have instead 8.3mm. So, it's a bit smaller than the Apple Pencil.
I think just one rechargeable AAAA battery would do, because the internal battery of the Apple is around the size of an AAAA battery (maybe slightly longer, even):
![]()
If a Microsoft surface pen can last 15 hours per charge (double the charge of the Apple pencil, 7-8 hours), I don't see why Apple wouldn't be able to pull this.
Apple is not microsoft, if replacable battery is a consideration or repairability, Microsoft is better bet.
You are wasting time with a wrong brand. Apple does its way, dont like it dont buy it. Every one freaked out when Iphone was introduced without an easy way to open battery or replace it. Pretty much whole industry went that way after iPhone. There is no end to opinions and wants of individuals. Apple doesnt owe anything to anyone, Apple has their own definition of doing better, and they follow their own strategy.That's a generic statement that you can apply to anything as an excuse.
- Microsoft Word in Apple Silicon doesn't have all features as the x86 version.
- Apple is not Microsoft. Apple is Apple.
- Apple locks the SSD firmware on the Mac studio.
- Apple is not Microsoft. Apple is Apple.
- iPad's Stage Manager is severely limited.
- Apple is not Microsoft. Apple is Apple.
Now, of course Apple is not Microsoft. But that doesn't mean that Apple cannot or should not do better. In that particular example, they absolutely can make design a product that is more easily repairable by the user, but they deliberately chose not to because they think users will just purchase a new Apple Pencil and a shiny new iPad when their Apple Pencil goes bad (whereas they might instead get fed up and go for the competition).
You are wasting time with a wrong brand. Apple does its way, dont like it dont buy it. Every one freaked out when Iphone was introduced without an easy way to open battery or replace it. Pretty much whole industry went that way after iPhone. There is no end to opinions and wants of individuals. Apple doesnt owe anything to anyone, Apple has their own definition of doing better, and they follow their own strategy.
Like I said, you cant have it all, pick what is important and buy the right product.
Apple doesnt owe anything to anyone, Apple has their own definition of doing better, and they follow their own strategy.
Like I said, you cant have it all, pick what is important and buy the right product.
It's not that Apple wants to but can't make USB-C happen, they simply don't want to until they have to. There are plenty of engineers who can create these types of solutions at Apple.Seriously Apple, hire these people. Third parties and student engineers and programmers are doing a better job than you are at this point.
I don’t know, I’d say hire the person that can show you something truly new, not just making a fairly minor tweak to someone else’s existing product.Seriously Apple, hire these people. Third parties and student engineers and programmers are doing a better job than you are at this point.
Well u were asking if apple can mass produce usbc ports.Never said Apple doesn’t use USB C. I wouldn’t be surprised if Covid supply chain issues delayed the set up of production lines at scale. Beats line already uses USB C but they don’t sell as much as AirPods. I can see Apple setting up at mass scale for IPhone USBC first and then roll to AirPods.
There is much more to making hardware changes than doing one offs. Nothing done by Apple is arbitrary.Seriously Apple, hire these people. Third parties and student engineers and programmers are doing a better job than you are at this point.
Apple ships way more iPhones and AirPods than other devices with USBC. Changes at that scale don’t happen overnight or in vacuum. Last 2-3 years supply chains have been constrained with zero Covid policy in china. Apple wasn’t gonna rush to USBC for devices which sell in tens of millions.Well u were asking if apple can mass produce usbc ports.
I just said that apple already does exactly this for 8 years in multiple products.
So i dont understand your point why covid should hinder them in putting usbc into airpods.
Well if u believe.Apple ships way more iPhones and AirPods than other devices with USBC. Changes at that scale don’t happen overnight or in vacuum. Last 2-3 years supply chains have been constrained with zero Covid policy in china. Apple wasn’t gonna rush to USBC for devices which sell in tens of millions.
There are cost considerations, yield from manufacturers, and other factors. Apple doesn’t have infinite resources, they do have to prioritize what features to roll out given their production, supply chain and sales channels capacity. Imagine being constrained for USBC components and not able to sell enough iPhones or an AirPods.
iPhones have been manufactured for more than a decade. Yet there are yield issues, supply constraints when new models, components are introduced. Heck Macs have been there for ever, yet they are constrained by scale at times.Changing a production line isn’t easy as speculating on the macrumors site. Apple may not consider changing the whole production line for millions of devices to USB C as priority or feasible than some of the posters here. You need to look up how manufacturing, supply chain works.Well if u believe.
Usbc is of the shelf component for a decade in the billions by all kind of manufacturers.
what can be more challenging for a product: integrate such a simple „old“ component or much more sophisticated parts like the camera system who have to be designed from scratch and customized just for apple?
Imho apple sticks to lightning just cos they make more money with licensing
…and the supply chain for these parts has to be in place along with theAre you seriously implying Apple’s engineers are not capable of doing this? They are light years ahead of this guy and others you mention. The difference is that Apple’s engineers have to wait for orders from the executive team before they can execute. Please, please, get a clue.