Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Originally posted by Jovian9
I'm pretty sure that cleverly wording raping/killing your mother or wife to the tune of a most likely pre-programmed drum machine beat does not qualify as gifted. This guy has no talent at all....only hype....hype that is fueled by a society who cannot think for itself....but relies on television and media to tell it what is right and what is wrong.
Comparing Eminem to The Beatles.....come on now.

I don't need to read any more of your post to know that you haven't ever listened to Eminem after you make such a blanketing and ignorant statement. To take the most extreme example of Eminem's lyrics and claim that's all he does is like me complaining that all my new iMac does is crash, because it's crashed once or twice. These, like the Eminem lyrics you cite, are very memorable, these being times for me and my machine, and his lyrics being the most extreme things he has to say, but I don't harp on either, because there is so much more than that to both his music and my computer.

Also, go ahead and reread my post again, because you may notice that I don't actually compare the two. Not that I don't think Eminem's worthy, but I was more comparing the ignorant attitudes of the 1950's and 60's towards rock and roll to the ignorant attitudes in the last two decades about rap music, and of course, you proved my point beautifully by dropping the standard "It's all about raping and killing!!!!" line. Fifty years ago, I'm sure we'd be having a very similar argument, and your thoughts might be summed up with "Those Beatles songs are all about the sex!! The sex!!!"
 
Apple 'Lost Itself'

Does Apple owe Eminem $10 million for an 8 second rendition of "Lose Yourself"? Probably not. But they should buck up and pay it anyway. And the reason is that at this early stage in the birth of online music, Apple has to bend over backwards to please the artists so that they will agree to let their work be sold on ITMS. If Apple "wins" this case they still 'lose themselves' when other artists, who are PARANOID about getting the royalties due them, see Apple as the bad guy.

Regardless of what happens, Eminem and his publisher are GREEDY GREEDY GREEDY. $10 Million to let a little boy sing your song is insane and the respect I had for Eminem's musical talent vanished along with his integrity.

It's a sad situation all around.
 
Originally posted by marccarter
Michael Jacksons endorsement deal with Pepsi was rumoured to be $15 million, and that was in 1986, so I should think others have come close since then. No idea what other more recent artists command.

But surely by not doing endorsements makes you more expensive and attractive for when you do agree to a deal? Isn't that really what this is about? Eminem may not be worth $10 million, some of you don't think he is worth 50 Cents (little joke, like it?) but the more adverts he appeared on, the less he would be worth. Hardly a big deal if you manage to sign an endorsement deal with someone who is on every other advert and bill board. So by keeping away from endorsements, Eminem is, like it or not, increasing his value.

Marc


I'm not quite sure, but didn't Michael Jackson actually appear in those ads? If so, that explains the huge sum of money. Totally different if it's music only. Also, in this case (Apple), it would usually be roughly half the amount of money usually payed for, because it is only a cover, which means the Record Company that owns the master track gets nil. Only the publisher (that may also be a record company).
I think Led Zeplin was rumored to have cost Toyota $3 million a couple of years ago. It cost that much because they'd always refused up till then.
Massive artists cost hundreds of thoudands of dollars, but there are only a handful of artists that would cost more than $1 million, simply because it would never be worth spending over that amount for an ad music, and record companies aren't stupid, they will never over-price themselves beyond reason. Unless their answer is no from the start.
This $10 million dollar figure really makes me laugh.
 
Settlement suggestion

Originally posted by OSUbuckeyefan
If anything, eminem should be paying Apple for endorsing HIS product...

I think Apple can settle this rather easily: they should just give 1 iPod to each of the guy's multiple personalities:

* An original 5GB iPod to Marshall B. Mathers, III

* A 40GB 3G to Slim Shady, and

* A teenie-weenie pink mini to Eminem


😀
 
I have listened to plenty of Eminem. A friend of mine loves Eminem and tries to get me to listen all the time. I am not a music elitist.....I give anything a chance before I decide it is worth it or I just do not talk about it at all.
What ignorant attitude about rap music are you suggesting in the last 2 decades? Rap music has only grown and became more popular. Just because Bill O'Reilly might not like rap doesn't mean there is an ignorant attitude. Look at sales and you will see that they have only grown. Maybe you should look back into the 80's (that decade) at early hip hop and who really created contraversy (2 Live Crew, N.W.A.). Then there was an ignorant attitude about hip hop. That was contraversy over free speech rights. All Eminem is doing is grabbing onto a generation that needs MTV to tell it what Hip Hop music really is....but MTV has lost touch with that ever since they ended the show YO MTV Raps.
Don't get me wrong... I have no problems with a white rapper.....but he isn't even in the top 50 MC's of all time.....he's only in the top promotional period of all time....that's it.
McDonalds gets a lot of hype too....but do you really think their burgers are some of the best around?
 
Originally posted by ph8te
Sarcasm, Irony, and a bit of Tounge-In-Cheek are not your strong point I see. I was only trying to make some people laugh. But since you find this a very serious issue, I apologize for my dumbwitted sense of humour.

Small tip. there's a reason there are emoticons on the site. 😉
 
Originally posted by junior
I'm not quite sure, but didn't Michael Jackson actually appear in those ads? If so, that explains the huge sum of money. Totally different if it's music only. Also, in this case (Apple), it would usually be roughly half the amount of money usually payed for, because it is only a cover, which means the Record Company that owns the master track gets nil. Only the publisher (that may also be a record company).
I think Led Zeplin was rumored to have cost Toyota $3 million a couple of years ago. It cost that much because they'd always refused up till then.
Massive artists cost hundreds of thoudands of dollars, but there are only a handful of artists that would cost more than $1 million, simply because it would never be worth spending over that amount for an ad music, and record companies aren't stupid, they will never over-price themselves beyond reason. Unless their answer is no from the start.
This $10 million dollar figure really makes me laugh.

Huh? What I was trying to point out was that artists CAN command $10 million. The point is, that if people think Eminem was endorsing Apple - I know it is obvious he wasn't but that's not my decision - then the POTENTIAL value for a big endorsement falls.

I tried really hard to explain it, but I will try again. I don't know for sure, and have no evidence, but I THINK the point is not that he want's paying for an endorsement, but that his image/identity/whatever could be downvalued if people were to think he had endorsed products already. Think rarity if you like, if there were 10,000 Mona Lisa's, each one would be worth less. As there is just the one, it's worth a few quid. And no, I am not comparing Eminem to an historical painting or a celebrated painter, before you all start.

I am reading this quote;

"Eminem has never nationally endorsed any commercial products and ... even if he were interested in endorsing a product, any endorsement deal would require a significant amount of money, possibly in excess of $10 million," according to the 15-page lawsuit filed Friday in U.S. District Court in Detroit.

to get this opinion. It dosn't say he considers this a sort of endorsement, or if you would like to mpay a few quid yours could be the first product he Endorses. It also says 'possibly'.

I really think this is not about Apple not paying for something, it is about the publisher thinking that their product has now lost some value.

Of course, I am probably wrong, but we will know more if and when it gets to court.

Marc
 
Originally posted by rt_brained
Finally, someone who knows what they're talking about.

Oh, that reminds me Silicon, I've been meaning to pass on the following:

SPACE GHOST and all related characters and elements are trademarks of Hanna-Barbera. All material including images and illustrations is protected by copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual property rights which are owned and controlled by The Cartoon Network (TCN) or by other parties that have licensed their material to TCN. Such material may not be copied, reproduced, republished, uploaded, posted, transmitted, or distributed in any way, including by e-mail or other electronic means. Without the prior written consent of the owner, use of the materials on any other web site or networked computer environment is a violation of the copyrights, trademarks, and other proprietary rights, and is prohibited.


Cute and I WILL, once again, stress the difference. Personal use vs. business use to sell a product. Apple is using Eninem's music to stress that we have the tunes and try and entice more users to buy iPods and use iTunes Music store. Doesn't matter if some kid is sing the freaking song because he likes it. What am I doing? Oh I'm sorry. I like Adult Swim on the cartoon network. 🙄 Its called common sense. Try it sometime. You might learn to like it.
 
Oh and one final note. Anyone care to hazard a guess how fast Apple would sue someone if they used a PowerBook in a major motion picture and didn't bother to ask Apple. It works both ways guys.
 
if you were to READ the lawsuit, it alleges (in points 16-30) that Eminem WAS contacted about using his song(s) and REFUSED to give apple permission to use them, and only recently discovered that at least one of the ads featuring his song was run ANYWAY.

in other words, if MTV ran the ad, then all three parties being sued used copyrighted material not only without permission or compensation, but AGAINST the demands of the copyright holder.

"Don't use my songs in your ads."

"OK"

*sends ad with song to MTV*

*LAWSUIT*

If any part of that lawsuit is correct, then all the involved parties are going to be paying up...

Apple blew it, kiddos...
 
Originally posted by 1macker1
If Apple didnt think they did anything wrong, why did they pull the commercial. This was not a random act, this was Apple putting up a set with actors and apple picking a popular song at the time. I seen the commecial, and I though it was in a round about way saying that EM thought the apple store was a good idea.

*sigh*

You really don't get it do you?

ALL of those iPod/iTMS commercials ran around the same time last year and haven't been aired in quite some time. Apple didn't pull it because of any legal pressure.

Do you think these people singing those songs are "round about ways" of the original artists endorsing Apple? Please. 🙄
 
Re: Eminem's Lost Himself

Originally posted by jocknerd
A sad day was a few years ago when the Girl Scouts of America was sued by ASCAP because they were singing campfire songs without permission from ASCAP.
Wow! Just imagining someone conceiving such a lawsuit is about as pitifully, unbelievably low as it gets.

You'd think people and organizations with more money than many of us will ever see could find more compassionate ways of using their time.

Is there a dis-ease here somewhere or what?
 
Originally posted by jholzner
Umm...I can't believe Apple didn't get permission. They are a HUGE corporation...don't they know these things? I dunno...


Since chiat/day did the commercial they were the ones that had to get permission.

Maybe eminem will put the money to good use. Like getting music lessons, vocal training, talent or to track down and burn all copies of his movie. Might even take Elton to dinner.
 
From reading the lawsuit, if it's true then Apple and Chiat/Day are guilty of copyright enfringement.

However, I think the $10 million part because it portrayed Eminem as endorsing the iTMS is just gouging for money.

Unless Apple lawyers have a good explanation or found some legal precedent for this, I forsee this being settled quietly out of court.
 
I'm waiting

Originally posted by crookedcharlie
I'm betting ours in the last generation that's going to hold on to the vaguely racist notion that rap is somehow not "music."

It happened with the blues for a half-century, then white people "invented" rock and roll by ripping off blues musicians no one had ever heard of.

Eminem is one of the most gifted lyricists alive today. To me, this is not up for discussion. You all can hold on to your notions that he's somehow not talented, but you must know that you're in the same camp who called The Beatles "unfocused noise" back in the day...

Please musically back up your argument that rap is indeed music.

According to this logic, if Hickery Dickery Dock were set to music, this would make for a compelling statement? Please musically back up your opinion that "Eminem is one of the most gifted lyricists alive today". Bob Dylan is still alive, is he not? -And this is just one example. I understand this is built on the foundation of perspective, but please site examples and enlighten the rest of us. You cannot however argue that he is a gifted musician. So musically speaking, his vocal ability is laughable, his plastic-beats are sophomoric, his approach consists of talking/yelling atop prerecorded music, and his songs go absolutely nowhere.

Also, you stated that rock n' roll was a rip off of the blues... what do you think hip-hop is a rip off of??? Any clue? I'll give you a hint, old soul music and disco. It will do you well to listen to some old albums. BTW: You made a comparison to the Beatles. Do you honestly think Eminem will be relevant forty years from now? -For sanity's sake, I hope not.
 
Originally posted by Rower_CPU
So, why is the suit happening now and not last summer when the ads were actually run?
Wild guess, but maybe because lawyers needed this much time to construct a case they thought they'd win/settle?
 
Originally posted by mjones4th
Bottom line, Apple was wrong on this one, it is copyright infringement.
So, when was the publisher's claim actually proven? Are you're implying we've all missed something you seem to know with certainty? 🙄
 
That's BS

Suing because someone else sang his song on a commercial? That is total BS. I'm sure the rules governing music are more complicated, but this sounds like another frivolous lawsuite to me. Someone trying to make a quick buck. It might be technically justifiable lawsuit, but unnecessary one in terms of common sense. I hope Triumph the Insult Comic Dog makes fun of him on Conan O'Brien show.
 
Re: I'm waiting

Originally posted by The Dreaming
Please musically back up your argument that rap is indeed music.

Do you really want me to cite the definition of music and then explain why rap fits it? Really? Even though you've probably looked it up yourself in order to "disprove" that it's music, found that it does fit, and discovered you have no real argument? I'm not going to. It's music. I'm sorry you disagree with the rest of the world, but I'm not interesting in proving that gravity works either. It's music because it's music. An art form of sounds, an expression of a person or group of persons through sound is music. Whether you like it or not, it's music. I may not like a painting that's nothing but a single shade of orange on a canvas, but I'm not enough of an elitst snob to claim it's not a painting...

According to this logic, if Hickery Dickery Dock were set to music, this would make for a compelling statement? Please musically back up your opinion that "Eminem is one of the most gifted lyricists alive today". Bob Dylan is still alive, is he not? -And this is just one example. I understand this is built on the foundation of perspective, but please site examples and enlighten the rest of us. You cannot however argue that he is a gifted musician. So musically speaking, his vocal ability is laughable, his plastic-beats are sophomoric, his approach consists of talking/yelling atop prerecorded music, and his songs go absolutely nowhere.

ONE OF THE. Bob Dylan's talent doesn't diminish Eminem's any. You realize that, right? You realize that there can be different types of talent, and that because someone is talented doesn't make someone else less talented, right?

I'm not going to print out Eminem lyrics on a message board and explain why I think they're well written. I don't see a reason to. You're simply going to disagree, and I frankly don't value your opinion that much after reading what you've written here. I will say this: Art is about evoking emotion. Whether it be love, hate, regret, or longing, art is meant to bring it out of us. To deny that Eminem is good at evoking emotion is ridiculous.

Also, are lead singers not musicians, since they only "yell over pre-recorded tracks?" What's the minimum an artist has to do in order to reach your approval? The world is waiting for your standards!!

Producing a rap song isn't simply singing over a pre-recorded song, and you know that. There's mixing of beats, laying in different instruments, breaks, and plenty else, and at the same time trying to make the beat work with the meter of your rhymes. Eminem's songs go plenty of places for a lot of people (incluind Grammy voters, BTW). A lesser man would cite example of A Beatles song that literally goes nowhere (She loves You, Ya, Ya, Ya, repeat 13X), but I don't feel like it.

Also, you stated that rock n' roll was a rip off of the blues... what do you think hip-hop is a rip off of??? Any clue? I'll give you a hint, old soul music and disco. It will do you well to listen to some old albums. BTW: You made a comparison to the Beatles. Do you honestly think Eminem will be relevant forty years from now? -For sanity's sake, I hope not.

It came from the clubs of the 1970's, and DJ's keeping "breaks" in songs alive so the people could dance longer. Soon, MC's began rapping over them, and the rest is a multi-billion dollar industry. I've listened to plenty of old albums, thanks, but I appreciate the offer. I'm not sure I'd call it a rip-off, more like an outgrowth, but we'll disagree there, too.

Do I think Eminem will be relevant 40 years from now? I have no idea. I'd imagine he will, simply because he's produced a well-received body of work, and has plenty left to put out. I could be wrong, I'll have to wait and see.

I, however, must repeat that I never compared the two, only compared rock and roll and rap...
 
Re: That's BS

Originally posted by macphoria
Suing because someone else sang his song on a commercial? That is total BS.

After they asked and were turned down? I don't think so.

Using a song after their request was turned down was stupid.
 
Originally posted by sjk
Wild guess, but maybe because lawyers needed this much time to construct a case they thought they'd win/settle?

Possibly. But cease and desist notices would have made more sense when the commercials were actually running than a lawsuit 8 months later. Seems they're more after a settlement than preventing any actual inappropriate use of the material.
 
Originally posted by Rower_CPU
Possibly. But cease and desist notices would have made more sense when the commercials were actually running than a lawsuit 8 months later. Seems they're more after a settlement than preventing any actual inappropriate use of the material.

THANK YOU! (Sorry for shouting, but this crap gets my goat).

I fin it hard that his people did not find out about what Apple had done till now. Also his PR machine has not mentioned that they sought relief outside of the courts before the suit.

We need tort reform now....
 
Originally posted by JediL
From reading the lawsuit, if it's true then Apple and Chiat/Day are guilty of copyright enfringement.

However, I think the $10 million part because it portrayed Eminem as endorsing the iTMS is just gouging for money.

Unless Apple lawyers have a good explanation or found some legal precedent for this, I forsee this being settled quietly out of court.

I doubt he will see 10 million. It will be settled out of court and Eminem will get lots of publicity that he does not have to buy. Hell, we are talking about him in a Mac group.

Again, Chiat/Day was the party that had the responsibility to clear the material with the publisher and I doubt CD has as deep pockets as Apple does.

Who knows, Apple could offer him and exclusive at the iTMS. Of course if he does sue and wins and he ever makes the mistake of not clearing the music, the infringed artist stands to make some big bucks from someone who "knows the law" but chose to ignore it.

Unfortunately the true winners in either case will be the lawyers. Shakespeare may have had the right idea!
 
Re: Re: I'm waiting

Originally posted by crookedcharlie
Do you really want me to cite the definition of music and then explain why rap fits it? Really? Even though you've probably looked it up yourself in order to "disprove" that it's music, found that it does fit, and discovered you have no real argument? I'm not going to. It's music. I'm sorry you disagree with the rest of the world, but I'm not interesting in proving that gravity works either. It's music because it's music. An art form of sounds, an expression of a person or group of persons through sound is music. Whether you like it or not, it's music. I may not like a painting that's nothing but a single shade of orange on a canvas, but I'm not enough of an elitst snob to claim it's not a painting...



ONE OF THE. Bob Dylan's talent doesn't diminish Eminem's any. You realize that, right? You realize that there can be different types of talent, and that because someone is talented doesn't make someone else less talented, right?

I'm not going to print out Eminem lyrics on a message board and explain why I think they're well written. I don't see a reason to. You're simply going to disagree, and I frankly don't value your opinion that much after reading what you've written here. I will say this: Art is about evoking emotion. Whether it be love, hate, regret, or longing, art is meant to bring it out of us. To deny that Eminem is good at evoking emotion is ridiculous.

Also, are lead singers not musicians, since they only "yell over pre-recorded tracks?" What's the minimum an artist has to do in order to reach your approval? The world is waiting for your standards!!

Producing a rap song isn't simply singing over a pre-recorded song, and you know that. There's mixing of beats, laying in different instruments, breaks, and plenty else, and at the same time trying to make the beat work with the meter of your rhymes. Eminem's songs go plenty of places for a lot of people (incluind Grammy voters, BTW). A lesser man would cite example of A Beatles song that literally goes nowhere (She loves You, Ya, Ya, Ya, repeat 13X), but I don't feel like it.



It came from the clubs of the 1970's, and DJ's keeping "breaks" in songs alive so the people could dance longer. Soon, MC's began rapping over them, and the rest is a multi-billion dollar industry. I've listened to plenty of old albums, thanks, but I appreciate the offer. I'm not sure I'd call it a rip-off, more like an outgrowth, but we'll disagree there, too.

Do I think Eminem will be relevant 40 years from now? I have no idea. I'd imagine he will, simply because he's produced a well-received body of work, and has plenty left to put out. I could be wrong, I'll have to wait and see.

I, however, must repeat that I never compared the two, only compared rock and roll and rap...


Just a thought, but aren't we getting a SLIGHT bit violent in our defense? *runs and hides*

*plays with fire* Maybe it's because you listen to songs about killing mothers/girlfriends.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.