Originally posted by The Dreaming
If you must contend that this work is poetry, so be it. However, unless this piece contains the work of a vocalist or instrumentalist, then its not music. And dont try and tell me this artist or genre redefined the definition of music. This type of work isnt even relevant by respectable musicians, and youre out of your league if you think such rubbish.
Originally posted by The Dreaming
If an artist's sole work centers on synthesizers, then he/she is at best a synthetic artist.
Originally posted by 1macker1
Maybe people here would see the wrong doing on apple's part if it was Celine Dion or Garth Brooks filing the lawsuit.
Originally posted by The Dreaming
If an artist's sole work centers on synthesizers, then he/she is at best a synthetic artist. I presume its a matter of perspective. If I attended a concert and the band sang atop the background of one of their albums, I would walk out. If many of the Eminem crowd were faced with the same scenario, they wouldnt know the difference, or care to venture out from the rock they live under, to discover that it gets better than this. I have higher standards for music and just expect more.
Originally posted by Les Kern
If true Apple did a dum-dum. I would submit, though, that instead of Slim being the torch-bearer of teenaged angst and urban/social issues, he has shown his true colors: businessman first, rebel/poet last. Way last. Let him win, and then drop him in the dustbin with the countless has-beens.
Originally posted by rspress
Maybe he will give it to his mom to buy drugs with. Just as long as he does not spend it on making another movie!
Speaking of that, if someone wanted to go through his movie frame by frame and see if there are any images of Macs in it maybe Apple could sue him for using the image of Macs without their permission. Of course someone would have to sit through every frame of the film. This might be a good punishment for the terrorists at Guantanamo Bay, it would certainly teach them not to mess with the United States anymore! Of course Amnesty International would find out and we would really be in trouble then. 😀
Originally posted by junior
So am I in the minority here in saying that I didn't think his movie was that bad?
Originally posted by rspress
This might be a good punishment for the terrorists at Guantanamo Bay, it would certainly teach them not to mess with the United States anymore!
Originally posted by mjones4th
Dreaming, why are you so eletist? How do you assume to speak for 'respectable musicians'?
The bottom line is that rap contains elements (rhythm, pitch, etc.) that qualify it as music. If you or others can't see that, then you are unable to distinguish your opinion from fact, concerning the genre. And ummm, both vocalist and instrumentalist are present on this and most other rap songs. Duh.
If its bad music in your opinion, that's fine. Lots of it is bad music in my opinion. But don't throw the baby out with the bath water.
I'm out of my league. Oooooh. What league would that be? The intellectual discussion of ideas league? It seems to me that to be in that league at all, openmindedness is a prerequisite. Are you in that league?
I won't try and tell you anything else because its a waste of time.
This is well-known.Originally posted by junior
By the way, you mentioned The Beatles being incomparable to Eminem in a previous post, and now your rant about 'artificial and pre-recorded sounds' reminded me of something.
Firstly, you're right when you say they're incomparable. Beatles really were pioneers (no sarcasm).
They were such incredible pioneers that they were one of the first, if not the first people to actually utilise 'artificial, pre-recorded sounds' for their live recordings and performances. Did you know that? I bet you didn't. I'm sure you now absolutely hate the Beatles.
Originally posted by digiface
When I saw this topic I knew it would be people who like rap, versus those who don't.
Lets not forget that Mac Users include people who listen to rap almost exclusively like me. And also every Mac user is not a middle-aged suburban rock listener.
That being said, I feel some of my fellow Mac users who visit this site are now against me. And some are with me. I don't want to choose sides. We are all here united as Mac Users!😉
Be cool.
Well, considering he meant it as an insult (as most people do), I wouldn't expect you to call yourself one...Originally posted by The Dreaming
I also never claimed to be an elitist.
Originally posted by marccarter
How very 'off topic' of you chaps!
Go and check the title, this has NOTHING to do with arguments over musical (or non musical) ability.
Marc
Originally posted by BobbyBox
Um, not sure if this has been raised already.....
But the date of the copyright registration is October 2003 but the alleged infringement is sited from May 2003 to September....
Can you still sue for damages for a period of infringment prior to registration?
A crafty lawyer could probably argue that in the grand scheme the label did not consider it of significant value until they saw the mistake that Apple made then thought "We can make some money here"...suddenly the lyrics become the most sacred corporate assets since the Dead Sea Scrolls....
If I were Apple i'd kick Eninem off iTunes (It not like Apple make any money of the service anyway) then probably do an outragously disrespectful parody of this very lawsuit and then
as a final act of Corporate revenge torch his offices and have him bumped off Soprano's style......I guess that's why i'm not worth $4 billion 🙂
(I jest with that last comment.....don't want the FBI/ECHELON computers flagging this post for further investigation...hehe)
I was mirroring your "strong opinion proclaimed as fact/truth" statement simply hoping you'd be aware of how it came across to me. It's one of those things I find "offensive", like my feedback appears to have been to you? 😉 Nothing personal (heck, I don't even know you)... just felt like nitpicking that one particular statement to keep ya honest. 😀 Sorry for any disturbance.Originally posted by mjones4th
Testy aren't we? I apologize for concluding that apple had in fact violated his publishing rights without wi=aiting for a settlement. But I bet you believe Scott Peterson did it, hmmm?
Originally posted by Counterfit
Well, considering he meant it as an insult (as most people do), I wouldn't expect you to call yourself one...
And it's so nice to see people taking my pervious advice 🙄
Originally posted by LethalWolfe
I know you and The Dreaming went round and round for a few pages but I don't think those remarks are warrented. The Dreaming showed character in his last post and, IMO, was sincere<sp?> in what he said. If someone apologizes and admits they were wrong I think it's poor form to take another shot at them like that.