Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
After reading the case the Beatles has aganist apple, i'm thinking Apple are just a bunch of crooks, just like most big business. I hope MM and the Beatles win their lawsuits.
 
Re: Re: Re: I'm waiting

Originally posted by The Dreaming
If you must contend that this work is poetry, so be it. However, unless this piece contains the work of a vocalist or instrumentalist, then it’s not music. –And don’t try and tell me this artist or genre redefined the definition of music. This type of work isn’t even relevant by respectable musicians, and you’re out of your league if you think such rubbish.

Dreaming, why are you so eletist? How do you assume to speak for 'respectable musicians'?

The bottom line is that rap contains elements (rhythm, pitch, etc.) that qualify it as music. If you or others can't see that, then you are unable to distinguish your opinion from fact, concerning the genre. And ummm, both vocalist and instrumentalist are present on this and most other rap songs. Duh.

If its bad music in your opinion, that's fine. Lots of it is bad music in my opinion. But don't throw the baby out with the bath water.

I'm out of my league. Oooooh. What league would that be? The intellectual discussion of ideas league? It seems to me that to be in that league at all, openmindedness is a prerequisite. Are you in that league?

I won't try and tell you anything else because its a waste of time.
 
Its obvious

When I saw this topic I knew it would be people who like rap, versus those who don't.

Lets not forget that Mac Users include people who listen to rap almost exclusively like me. And also every Mac user is not a middle-aged suburban rock listener.

That being said, I feel some of my fellow Mac users who visit this site are now against me. And some are with me. I don't want to choose sides. We are all here united as Mac Users!😉

Be cool.
 
Maybe people here would see the wrong doing on apple's part if it was Celine Dion or Garth Brooks filing the lawsuit.
 
After reading the full compliant on MacMinute, it appears that Em is seeking roughly $75,000. I see no reason for Apple to NOT settle if indeed it's only $75,000. Heck, even 10x that would be worth considering.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I'm waiting

Originally posted by The Dreaming
If an artist's sole work centers on synthesizers, then he/she is at best a synthetic artist.

Stevie Wonder's a synthetic artist? Yeah, right. Pull the other one.

Seems to me that you're allowing your eyes (among other things) to interfere with what your ears are hearing. Tools are tools; what's important is what comes out, and not how it gets out.
 
Originally posted by 1macker1
Maybe people here would see the wrong doing on apple's part if it was Celine Dion or Garth Brooks filing the lawsuit.

Well, after seeing that they asked for permission, got turned down, and went ahead anyway, I really don't think you need to go any further. There's clearly grounds for a suit here.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I'm waiting

Originally posted by The Dreaming
If an artist's sole work centers on synthesizers, then he/she is at best a synthetic artist. I presume it’s a matter of perspective. If I attended a concert and the band sang atop the background of one of their albums, I would walk out. If many of the Eminem crowd were faced with the same scenario, they wouldn’t know the difference, or care to venture out from the rock they live under, to discover that it gets better than this. I have higher standards for music and just expect more.

I agree that if I went to a concert and the band or lack thereof just sang to prerecorded music I too would walk out.

However, the use of synthesizers in music does not make synthetic music. I remember several groups that proudly put on their albums "No Synthesizers!" but used so many effects on Guitars, Basses, Drums and Vocals that they were doing the same thing that a synthesizer does. A synthesizer affects the tone generated by the waveform generator through various filters to generate different sounds. The same thing a Guitar (waveform generator) does when plugged into effects pedals (filters).

Todays amplifiers do the same thing, using processors to model amps. The fender cybertwin is a good example. Of course I don't have much use for music purists, they are usually people who can't make their own music or try to elevate themselves on the shoulders of others. They are usually pretty boring to be around as well.
 
If true Apple did a dum-dum. I would submit, though, that instead of Slim being the torch-bearer of teenaged angst and urban/social issues, he has shown his true colors: businessman first, rebel/poet last. Way last. Let him win, and then drop him in the dustbin with the countless has-beens.
 
Originally posted by Les Kern
If true Apple did a dum-dum. I would submit, though, that instead of Slim being the torch-bearer of teenaged angst and urban/social issues, he has shown his true colors: businessman first, rebel/poet last. Way last. Let him win, and then drop him in the dustbin with the countless has-beens.

Maybe he will give it to his mom to buy drugs with. Just as long as he does not spend it on making another movie!

Speaking of that, if someone wanted to go through his movie frame by frame and see if there are any images of Macs in it maybe Apple could sue him for using the image of Macs without their permission. Of course someone would have to sit through every frame of the film. This might be a good punishment for the terrorists at Guantanamo Bay, it would certainly teach them not to mess with the United States anymore! Of course Amnesty International would find out and we would really be in trouble then. 😀
 
Originally posted by rspress
Maybe he will give it to his mom to buy drugs with. Just as long as he does not spend it on making another movie!

Speaking of that, if someone wanted to go through his movie frame by frame and see if there are any images of Macs in it maybe Apple could sue him for using the image of Macs without their permission. Of course someone would have to sit through every frame of the film. This might be a good punishment for the terrorists at Guantanamo Bay, it would certainly teach them not to mess with the United States anymore! Of course Amnesty International would find out and we would really be in trouble then. 😀

So am I in the minority here in saying that I didn't think his movie was that bad?
 
Originally posted by rspress
This might be a good punishment for the terrorists at Guantanamo Bay, it would certainly teach them not to mess with the United States anymore!

US: "Tell us where Bin Laden is, or it's more Slim Shady"
Terrorist: "No, PLEASE have the mercy of Allah! Bin Laden in the Shakir-al-Beq valley, seventh cave to the left! Just, please no more of the American popular star! I will telling you everything, In-sh'Allah!"
 
a bit of regret

Originally posted by mjones4th
Dreaming, why are you so eletist? How do you assume to speak for 'respectable musicians'?

The bottom line is that rap contains elements (rhythm, pitch, etc.) that qualify it as music. If you or others can't see that, then you are unable to distinguish your opinion from fact, concerning the genre. And ummm, both vocalist and instrumentalist are present on this and most other rap songs. Duh.

If its bad music in your opinion, that's fine. Lots of it is bad music in my opinion. But don't throw the baby out with the bath water.

I'm out of my league. Oooooh. What league would that be? The intellectual discussion of ideas league? It seems to me that to be in that league at all, openmindedness is a prerequisite. Are you in that league?

I won't try and tell you anything else because its a waste of time.

My response was entirely my opinion. I never claimed it was fact. I have different expectations and definitions for what I feel qualifies as music. Music is a highly subjective term... as we have seen. The one prerequisite is that it must be pleasant for the listener; this is where my opinion came in. I also never claimed to be an elitist. I do however have two qualifications for backing my opinions: I'm a guitar player, and an audiophile. Does this make my opinion more valid than the next guys? -Of course not... just possibly more passionate. If I came across as arrogant in my posts, it's probably because of my heartfelt position on this argument. Often the downside to being passionate is that you can easily leap into becoming overly passionate. For this, I apologize. In fact, I did some thinking on the subject and I feel I understand the opposing argument. All of these terms thrown around can be used arbitrarily to leverage any position. I used them in such a way as to define my belief… but I am also not too stubborn to admit that I also understand where everyone else is coming from. After much consideration, I feel my definition of music was too constrained. Such an antiquated definition of music, doesn’t allow for theory, or creativity to evolve. In a more honest and less heated statement, I can see how my belief didn’t allow for the greatest potential for expression. I do genuinely believe this, but I also have an illness for playing devil’s advocate.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: I'm waiting

Originally posted by junior
By the way, you mentioned The Beatles being incomparable to Eminem in a previous post, and now your rant about 'artificial and pre-recorded sounds' reminded me of something.
Firstly, you're right when you say they're incomparable. Beatles really were pioneers (no sarcasm).
They were such incredible pioneers that they were one of the first, if not the first people to actually utilise 'artificial, pre-recorded sounds' for their live recordings and performances. Did you know that? I bet you didn't. I'm sure you now absolutely hate the Beatles.
This is well-known.
 
Re: Its obvious

Originally posted by digiface
When I saw this topic I knew it would be people who like rap, versus those who don't.

Lets not forget that Mac Users include people who listen to rap almost exclusively like me. And also every Mac user is not a middle-aged suburban rock listener.

That being said, I feel some of my fellow Mac users who visit this site are now against me. And some are with me. I don't want to choose sides. We are all here united as Mac Users!😉

Be cool.

I agree. See above.
 
Re: a bit of regret

Originally posted by The Dreaming
I also never claimed to be an elitist.
Well, considering he meant it as an insult (as most people do), I wouldn't expect you to call yourself one...


And it's so nice to see people taking my pervious advice 🙄
 
Originally posted by marccarter
How very 'off topic' of you chaps!

Go and check the title, this has NOTHING to do with arguments over musical (or non musical) ability.

Marc

And your post is on topic? 😉 Come on, join the fun of off-topic posting - it's fun! Plus, discussing musical talent, etc., at least is somehwat related to the topic.

G5 PowerBooks are coming next Tuesday!!!

There, now THAT'S off topic.... 😎
 
Contest to settle this Flame?

Dudes & Dudettes, to settle this flame out, why not have a GarageBand duel?

Post the tracks on special new discussion devote to the fact that you folks love to hate one aother's tunes, and let MacForum members vote!

😀
 
Um, not sure if this has been raised already.....

But the date of the copyright registration is October 2003 but the alleged infringement is sited from May 2003 to September....

Can you still sue for damages for a period of infringment prior to registration?

A crafty lawyer could probably argue that in the grand scheme the label did not consider it of significant value until they saw the mistake that Apple made then thought "We can make some money here"...suddenly the lyrics become the most sacred corporate assets since the Dead Sea Scrolls....

If I were Apple i'd kick Eninem off iTunes (It not like Apple make any money of the service anyway) then probably do an outragously disrespectful parody of this very lawsuit and then

as a final act of Corporate revenge torch his offices and have him bumped off Soprano's style......I guess that's why i'm not worth $4 billion 🙂

(I jest with that last comment.....don't want the FBI/ECHELON computers flagging this post for further investigation...hehe)
 
Originally posted by BobbyBox
Um, not sure if this has been raised already.....

But the date of the copyright registration is October 2003 but the alleged infringement is sited from May 2003 to September....

Can you still sue for damages for a period of infringment prior to registration?

A crafty lawyer could probably argue that in the grand scheme the label did not consider it of significant value until they saw the mistake that Apple made then thought "We can make some money here"...suddenly the lyrics become the most sacred corporate assets since the Dead Sea Scrolls....

If I were Apple i'd kick Eninem off iTunes (It not like Apple make any money of the service anyway) then probably do an outragously disrespectful parody of this very lawsuit and then

as a final act of Corporate revenge torch his offices and have him bumped off Soprano's style......I guess that's why i'm not worth $4 billion 🙂

(I jest with that last comment.....don't want the FBI/ECHELON computers flagging this post for further investigation...hehe)

Yes, it's been mentioned a hundred times already.
And your other point regarding dropping Eminem from ITMS, that would totally piss off the record company and Apple would be screwed if the record company decided to drop Apple and go with another service. Not only will they loose many other artists, they will end up getting a very bad reputation amongst record companies.
 
Originally posted by mjones4th
Testy aren't we? I apologize for concluding that apple had in fact violated his publishing rights without wi=aiting for a settlement. But I bet you believe Scott Peterson did it, hmmm?
I was mirroring your "strong opinion proclaimed as fact/truth" statement simply hoping you'd be aware of how it came across to me. It's one of those things I find "offensive", like my feedback appears to have been to you? 😉 Nothing personal (heck, I don't even know you)... just felt like nitpicking that one particular statement to keep ya honest. 😀 Sorry for any disturbance.

Right now I don't believe anyone/anything in particular since this isn't the sort of thing I put (much) energy into speculating about. There's already more than enough of that to go around.
 
Re: Re: a bit of regret

Originally posted by Counterfit
Well, considering he meant it as an insult (as most people do), I wouldn't expect you to call yourself one...


And it's so nice to see people taking my pervious advice 🙄

I know you and The Dreaming went round and round for a few pages but I don't think those remarks are warrented. The Dreaming showed character in his last post and, IMO, was sincere<sp?> in what he said. If someone apologizes and admits they were wrong I think it's poor form to take another shot at them like that.


Les Kern,
Interesting perspective you have. Most people cry "sell-out" when an artist lets corporate america use his music. But you think MM is a sell-out because he's not letting corporate america use his music (lyrcis)? I don't think excercising<sp?> your rights regarding who can and cannot use your property (and in what ways they can and cannot use it) automatically brands you a businessman.


Lethal
 
Re: Re: Re: a bit of regret

Originally posted by LethalWolfe
I know you and The Dreaming went round and round for a few pages but I don't think those remarks are warrented. The Dreaming showed character in his last post and, IMO, was sincere<sp?> in what he said. If someone apologizes and admits they were wrong I think it's poor form to take another shot at them like that.

Gotta agree here - I was pretty against some of The Dreaming's comments as well, and challenged him on a couple points as well, however I appreciate his last post - he was man enough to admit he made a few incorrect comments in haste, and after reading some other posts, he realized he was being a little irrational in some of his comments. I respect tthat, and am not going to comment on any more of his posts.
 
i like the fact the eminem is suing apple, this brings them both publicity and brings Apple mindshare and cred.

apple has to play their cards right though on this. not to be seen unsupportive of artists.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.