Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I care about my device ownership. But everyone have a different view of what ownership is: I want it to be secure and all my digital transactions can be tracked in one place. Having 3rd party payment system allowed is not my choice and defy my device ownership.

So this should be leave as is unless there's no other options in the market.

Opposite here. I don't want my data, transactions, history, etc. all tired up with a single entity.
 
You don't own the OS. You have a licence to use it. You agreed to that, for you remember?

The developers DON'T own the APIs or free right in appstore the have a license they agreed to... Epic decided to ignore that and ADD in their own appstore so Fortnite was removed. and Epic banned. They should remain banned.
Well and indefinite license is largely indistinguishable from ownership.
No different from me selling you an Apple and me renting you these same Apple for a one time fee for ever.
 
One thing I’m confused about and I’ve seen conflicting answers:

Did Apple do something now prevents the game from working via the alt store in the EU, or did Epic just take it offline worldwide out of spite?

If it’s the latter I think Epic is clearly banking on the general public not understanding what the actual court ruling was. That’s pretty clear from many of the responses in this thread.

If it’s the former and Apple did something then yes that is problematic based on rulings in the EU.
I don’t think Apple has done anything (yet).

It seems Epic thinks it has found a loophole, and it will argue that it shouldn’t have to support two different versions of Fortnite for iOS, one for side loading in the EU and the other for the App Store elsewhere. So this stunt is an illustration of that.
 
Last edited:
Why don't Apple make their own Fortnite? Or is that an expensive endeavour?
As a direct answer, no it would not be "expensive" for a company like Apple, given the scale of their resources and the cost to develop a game like Fortnite. However, trying to be clever by "reverse" the point sort of leans toward missing the point.

Apple built and continues to evolve the hardware and platform to support others making the bazillion variations on applications that each, large to niche, market might want. It is the very point of a platform, it exists for things to be built on it. This is not a "chicken or egg" scenario. Platforms exist, then apps, not the other way around. People building platforms do so to enable others to add to it. Epic wants to use a platform they didn't build or help evolve and they want to do it for free. They want to take all of the money that Apple invests in the hardware of their devices, and software of their platforms and, for free, leverage it for their own business use. They are a business, of course they want to not pay and have higher profits. I don't blame them. But I also don't blame Apple for also wanting to make money and charge people for the hardware and software platform that they provide.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GucciGriffinIII
Honest question: who seriously enjoys playing Fortnite on a phone??

I get it if a phone is the only thing you can play games on but surely it can’t be an even remotely enjoyable experience to play a shooter on a touch screen?

I know controllers are a thing and there’s even those cool ones that attach to the side of your phone but if you’re that dedicated isn’t it worth investing in a Switch or something?
 
Fortnite has so many micro-transactions in-app that it is itself barely legal. There were many stories of kids stealing their parents cards to purchase some “Darth Vader costume” in game. It is same in almost all modern games so Fortnite is not unique, but we should pose a question whether it is worth to have such a bad gaming industry nowadays that tries to squeeze every cent from customers without anything revolutionary and actually good
 
Nah. Apple should get their greedy fingers outta users hardware that THEY paid for. If people wanna play Fortnite on their iPhone and Epic wants to provide that why should Apple be involved.
If the avenue for getting the game is the App Store, and Apple runs the App Store then Apple will be involved. If the app cannot abide by the rules of the App Store then the application will not be published.
By the way, if you actually read the license agreement, you would know that you accepted and agreed to Apple’s involvement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: uacd
Fortnite has so many micro-transactions in-app that it is itself barely legal. There were many stories of kids stealing their parents cards to purchase some “Darth Vader costume” in game. It is same in almost all modern games so Fortnite is not unique, but we should pose a question whether it is worth to have such a bad gaming industry nowadays that tries to squeeze every cent from customers without anything revolutionary and actually good
This is why I got bored with gaming and stopped playing games. Besides gaming is an addiction that they want to ruin the rest of you life with, like a drug. Thankfully I found more interesting things to do than play video games.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: gusmula and uacd
I’m not a fan of Fortnite; their business model has its own flaws, but I’m wholeheartedly for consumer choice. Consumers should have the choice to use any software they like on any platform they use and use any payment system of their choosing. Apple's decision is once again regrettable.
You agreed and accepted the terms and conditions of purchasing the device.
 
I just really can't understand the end-goal for Sweeney, here.

They want to be on Apple's and Google's storefronts, accessing hundreds of millions of potential users, making tens of millions of dollars in yearly revenue on the platform, but using external payment services to avoid paying a single penny apart from the $99/year (or $25 lifetime, in Google's case) developer fee?

Like, I agree that developers should not be locked in to using Apple's or Google's payment system and that there should be alternatives, but arguing that you should not pay any fee to the store owner is frankly nuts (and also hypocritical, since the Epic Games Store does charge a percentage of revenue for games sold there, regardless of where that revenue comes from, except in very specific circumstances).

Apple's store fee should be lower - 30% is borderline theft - and it makes sense that they allow external payment providers, but they should be allowed to take a cut - albeit smaller, of course - from those payments as well.
lets see
end users pay full price for the phone.
apple does not make content or host content for this game.
apple forces you to use there store and wants 30% of all action while just doing the min hosting that epic can do on their own if they where allowed to.
apple also wants netflix to give them 30% of sub costs when apple has there own steaming services.
 
BY all means - with all the issues we face in this country and the world - making sure a greedy game developer is free to shake down nine year olds for their allowance really is very important...said with full sarcastic intent...
 
BY all means - with all the issues we face in this country and the world - making sure a greedy game developer is free to shake down nine year olds for their allowance really is very important...said with full sarcastic intent...
Agree. We must prevent the greedy companies from shaking down the children playing with their iDevices or consoles.
 
I’m not a fan of Fortnite; their business model has its own flaws, but I’m wholeheartedly for consumer choice. Consumers should have the choice to use any software they like on any platform they use and use any payment system of their choosing. Apple's decision is once again regrettable.
Serious question: How does Apple get compensated for use of the App Store infrastructure for developing, reviewing, hosting, discovery (selling), distributing, and maintaining an app if that app is purchased from a separate payment platform?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bungaree.Chubbins
It’s time for Tim and apple to get slammed on this. Again in the courts and then by their customers If this is the kinds of BS they continue to do I may be trying an android in the near future. Europe gets an open App Store and I do not. A loyal costosmr since the Apple IIe. Apple has been great but they clearly are loosing their way. While we all love the highlight feature of 18.5 🙄. Apple could we possibly install a brain in Siri, someday? Is Apple an art company or an IT company? They are clearly tyrants.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Bungaree.Chubbins
So Tim Sweeny agreed to Apple App Store rules & Terms of use. Then violated those rules. Not just violated but used fraud and deception to violate them. Now Sweeney says he doesn't understand why Apple and Tim Cook won't return his phone calls.

Is this guy serious?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.