Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
theres a HUGE difference between challenging the system and just defying the Agreement you signed up to.
If said company is not willing to negotiate with said company then they are within their rights to take them to court to get better terms now you might not like that however sometimes that’s what people need to do.

As a consequence of that things that are done behind closed doors are getting brought into the light
 
I know it’s difficult
Microsoft launched their own phones and own mobile operating system
Yet the problem they had was developers wouldn’t make apps for it because of the low market share
As a consequence of google giving android away for FREE so in turn that pushed Microsoft out because google has the ability to be on devices from $25 to $2000 so that essentially means that unless governments legislate that google is not allowed to give android away for FREE
Then it’s extremely unlikely that there will be a 3rd OS anytime soon

So that is why you are seeing governments & courts making legislation that directly affects Apple by forcing changes upon them

Well I can’t speak for most but I’ve just upgraded my device from last years to the new current model
well HarmonyOS (Huawei) is a third alternative and is growing with a current 4% market share. Same with HyperOS (Xiaomi) because Chinese smartphone manufacturers cant continue to use Android after 2025.

And google is in the works it seems to replace AndroidOS with Fuchsia.

so not fully accurate
 
and 99.9999% of devs are adhering to the rules and releasing apps and making money.

that's an even bigger message ;)
that is going to get drowned out by exactly what I’ve said it’s already getting framed that way
That because a company challenged Apple then that sends a warning to every developer out there if you dare challenge us then we will crush you.
This is exactly the way Spotify is framing it in the EU and it’s exactly the same in how it will get framed in the USA
That is why epic will be back on the USA iOS App Store because it will then shine a light on it
 
  • Haha
Reactions: wbeasley
well HarmonyOS (Huawei) is a third alternative and is growing with a current 4% market share. Same with HyperOS (Xiaomi) because Chinese smartphone manufacturers cant continue to use Android after 2025.

And google is in the works it seems to replace AndroidOS with Fuchsia.

so not fully accurate
In Asia not the west there is a big difference because huawei is not allowed to compete in the west even though they have about
1 billion users so if they where allowed to compete then they would have apps on it because of how many customers it has plus the hardware is actually pretty good
That is why the Chinese market is tuff for Apple and why google is not number one in search in china because they are practically banned
So unless you’re saying that a communist country is the only way for 3 mobile OS’s then that kind of proves my point.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: wbeasley
It also sends the message to every developer out there
You dare challenge us and you will face the consequences of your actions
That is one of the reasons why Tim Sweeney is confident that epic will be back on the USA
iOS App Store

I am pretty sure that if Tim Sweeney tried the same stunt with Nintendo or Sony, Fortnite would be summarily booted from the switch and PlayStation app stores as well.

Besides, I am not sure what sort of message you want Apple to send by allowing Fortnite back into the App Store. That it’s okay to break the rules? Apple doesn’t have the rights to enforce the rules on their own platform?

I say it again. Just because Apple loses doesn’t mean Epic wins.
 
that is going to get drowned out by exactly what I’ve said it’s already getting framed that way
That because a company challenged Apple then that sends a warning to every developer out there if you dare challenge us then we will crush you.
This is exactly the way Spotify is framing it in the EU and it’s exactly the same in how it will get framed in the USA
That is why epic will be back on the USA iOS App Store because it will then shine a light on it
There is a difference between challenging Apple (what Spotify is doing) and actively breaking contractual agreements and defrauding Apple, then suing them (what Epic did).

Anyone looking objectively at the situation can understand that.
 
In Asia not the west there is a big difference because huawei is not allowed to compete in the west even though they have about
1 billion users so if they where allowed to compete then they would have apps on it because of how many customers it has plus the hardware is actually pretty good
That is why the Chinese market is tuff for Apple and why google is not number one in search in china because they are practically banned
So unless you’re saying that a communist country is the only way for 3 mobile OS’s then that kind of proves my point.
IMG_1806.jpeg

Well in Europe they are growing in share.

Many times a new option enters because the market leader either makes a mistake or is caught doing some shady things that is stoped.

And this new OS alternatives are largely a new thing so hasn’t developed fully yet
 
I am pretty sure that if Tim Sweeney tried the same stunt with Nintendo or Sony, Fortnite would be summarily booted from the switch and PlayStation app stores as well.

Besides, I am not sure what sort of message you want Apple to send by allowing Fortnite back into the App Store. That it’s okay to break the rules? Apple doesn’t have the rights to enforce the rules on their own platform?

I say it again. Just because Apple loses doesn’t mean Epic wins.
He’s not going to challenge the console makers because of what I’ve said based on how they sell their hardware then that is different now that is what he has said.
Like 71 million ps5 units since 2020 and the next generation is coming out about 2027 I believe that’s why.

Because in a way it strengthens Apple’s case by accepting them back on the USA iOS App Store that’s why because it removes what I said and it strengthens there argument in terms of money
 
  • Haha
Reactions: wbeasley
There is a difference between challenging Apple (what Spotify is doing) and actively breaking contractual agreements and defrauding Apple, then suing them (what Epic did).

Anyone looking objectively at the situation can understand that.
Now you might be right in that both companies took different approaches
However both companies are actually saying more or less the exact same things

That is why he’s confident about getting back on the USA ios App Store and that is what they will get accused of next and as a company they don’t want that
 
He’s not going to challenge the console makers because of what I’ve said based on how they sell their hardware then that is different now that is what he has said.
Like 71 million ps5 units since 2020 and the next generation is coming out about 2027 I believe that’s why.

Because in a way it strengthens Apple’s case by accepting them back on the USA iOS App Store that’s why because it removes what I said and it strengthens there argument in terms of money

That’s not the point I was making.

What I am saying is that if Tim Sweeney was found to have broken any rules of the switch platform, Fortnite would likely end up being removed and I doubt there would have been any controversy.

I would like to see Apple continue to block Epic from the iOS App Store. If Tim Sweeney is indeed as altruistic as he makes himself out to be, then let him walk the talk. Allow developers to eschew the 30% cut, while continuing to stay away from iOS and forswear any future profits from said platform.

Let him play the role of the tragic hero who has no place in this new world order that he helped usher in, if “winning” matters that much to him.
 
View attachment 2509832
Well in Europe they are growing in share.

Many times a new option enters because the market leader either makes a mistake or is caught doing some shady things that is stoped.

And this new OS alternatives are largely a new thing so hasn’t developed fully yet
Method 1: Using a Third-Party Installer

  1. Enable Unknown Sources:
    - Go to Settings > Privacy > Special app access> Install unknown apps.
    - Select your browser (e.g., Chrome) and enable Allow from this source.
  2. Download the APK:
    - Use a browser to download the Google Play Store APK. You can find the APK on trusted sites like APKMirror or APKPure. Make sure to download the latest version.
  3. Install the APK:
    - Once downloaded, open the APK file and follow the installation prompts.
  4. Install Google Services Framework:
    - You may also need to install the Google Services Framework and Google Play Services. Download their APKs from the same trusted sites and install them in the same way.
  5. Reboot Your Device:
    - Restart your smartphone to ensure that the installations take effect.
You can still put google play store on xiaomi devices outside of china.

Huawei is banned in parts of Europe and the USA so the market share won’t increase that much in Europe (because apparently they are shady)
 
  • Like
Reactions: davide_eu
so what's the app you want to run that requires removing iOS?

anyone?

anyone...
Well… Fortnite?
A proper Adblocking function.
Another browser that isn’t WebKit.
Older version of games/ apps that is no longer compatible with iOS
Like TapTap revenge

Or any other game/app that happens to not be allowed in the iOS AppStore.

Assuming you think iPhone hardware is the best hardware.

Or the most simple, because you want to.
 
  • Love
Reactions: davide_eu
He’s not going to challenge the console makers because of what I’ve said based on how they sell their hardware then that is different now that is what he has said.
Like 71 million ps5 units since 2020 and the next generation is coming out about 2027 I believe that’s why.
He’s not challenging console makers because he literally can’t afford to lose their business the way he lost Apple’s. That’s the only reason. Everything else is just an after-the-fact retconning Sweeney invented to justify his hypocrisy.

Now you might be right in that both companies took different approaches
However both companies are actually saying more or less the exact same things

That is why he’s confident about getting back on the USA ios App Store and that is what they will get accused of next and as a company they don’t want that
They’re saying the same thing, sure. But one was kicked out and one wasn’t - not because they’re challenging Apple, but because of actions. And fair-minded people see that.

I don’t trust anything Sweeney at face value, and I don’t think he’s confident at all. He’s trying to will it into existence, but if Apple had told him he’d be let back on he’d absolutely have said so. The fact that he hasn’t says everything i need to know.
 
That’s not the point I was making.

What I am saying is that if Tim Sweeney was found to have broken any rules of the switch platform, Fortnite would likely end up being removed and I doubt there would have been any controversy.

I would like to see Apple continue to block Epic from the iOS App Store. If Tim Sweeney is indeed as altruistic as he makes himself out to be, then let him walk the talk. Allow developers to eschew the 30% cut, while continuing to stay away from iOS and forswear any future profits from said platform.

Let him play the role of the tragic hero who has no place in this new world order that he helped usher in, if “winning” matters that much to him.
But he wouldn’t challenge the console makers because is that not where most of his Fortnite income comes from?

Hey listen Apple are well within their rights to not allow them back on however it’s very unlikely that will be the case as I’ve said it’s getting setup that way by the language that’s getting used previously
 
But he wouldn’t challenge the console makers because is that not where most of his Fortnite income comes from?

Hey listen Apple are well within their rights to not allow them back on however it’s very unlikely that will be the case as I’ve said it’s getting setup that way by the language that’s getting used previously

We will see.

As I have said numerous times before - one bets against Apple to their own detriment.
 
He’s not challenging console makers because he literally can’t afford to lose their business the way he lost Apple’s. That’s the only reason. Everything else is just an after-the-fact retconning Sweeney invented to justify his hypocrisy.


They’re saying the same thing, sure. But one was kicked out and one wasn’t - not because they’re challenging Apple, but because of actions. And fair-minded people see that.

I don’t trust anything Sweeney at face value, and I don’t think he’s confident at all. He’s trying to will it into existence, but if Apple had told him he’d be let back on he’d absolutely have said so. The fact that he hasn’t says everything i need to know.
I’ve just said that he wouldn’t do that to console makers because Fortnite only had 7% market share on iOS so that is why he did it.

The difference is one is in the EU and the other is America that is why it’s too totally different approaches

Well he just submitted on the 9th so not including the weekend then by most reports by the middle of next week
 
I’ve just said that he wouldn’t do that to console makers because Fortnite only had 7% market share on iOS so that is why he did it.

The difference is one is in the EU and the other is America that is why it’s too totally different approaches

Well he just submitted on the 9th so not including the weekend then by most reports by the middle of next week
We’ll see what happens. I’ll happily come back here and eat crow if I’m wrong!
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy and Abazigal
We will see.

As I have said numerous times before - one bets against Apple to their own detriment.
Well if that’s your opinion & most on here
Then that is also another reason why they will be back on
Because not only will it remove what I said
It will also remove the zero commission on payment links and then epic will be forced to comply or leave because the case would get thrown out if they challenged it again
 
Google gives android away for FREE
So then you get access to the play store and chrome as a requirement so that means every OEM has access to every major app straight away

So what that essentially means is if heretiq was to launch a mobile OS then you would have to give it away for free to compete with Android
Then on top of that you would need the financial resources behind you to compete with a trillion dollar company

Then even if you managed to get your OS onto an OEM you would then have to get developers to make apps for it then that is very unlikely because of your zero customer base considering it has taken instagram to make an official iPad app after 15 years then that tells you everything

how does a startup compete with a product that is free from a big company because there is no incentive to go to another provider because it’s free and you already have an existing customer base already there of over 3.5 billion active users
that is why google gives android away for free because then it guarantees them number 1 position and no government will ever legislate for google to charge for android because it’s FREE
Does Apple give iOS away for FREE? NO. Does Apple iOS compete with Android? YES. Can heretiq’s alternative mobile OS follow Apple’s model to compete with Android without giving it away for free? YES. A startup can compete on any dimensions where they provide superior value. Cost is not the only dimension of competition — there’s also utility, usability and quality. Do any one or more of those better than Android and you have a basis to compete without having give your mobile OS away. Why is this simple and plainly evident option so difficult to accept?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
Does Apple give iOS away for FREE? NO. Does Apple iOS compete with Android? YES. Can heretiq’s alternative mobile OS follow Apple’s model to compete with Android without giving it away for free? YES. Why is this simple and plainly evident option so difficult to accept?
there is only one country in the world with
Three mobile OS’s and no where else in the world
Now why do you think that is
 
If that was the case then Microsoft would have succeeded be they have the funds to take both companies on financially & software wise
However developers never made decent apps for it because of the low market share
As a consequence of google giving android away for free so that essentially means that it doesn’t matter if you sell a mobile at $25 dollars or $2000 dollars if you develop an app you are guaranteed to get customers
Because of the user base

So that is why governments & courts are legislating against Apple in various different countries because of how the current smartphone market is in the west as a consequence of how the current smartphone market is setup
So that is why Tim Sweeney is confident that epic will be back on the USA iOS App Store
Microsoft had a decade long head start against Apple and Google. And their low market share was because Microsoft tried to force Windows onto a mobile device instead of using their considerable capabilities to be inventive. As a result, the market rejected Windows Mobile/CE and chose iOS which competed by providing a 10X better user experience. Google smartly copied iOS to give the market what it preferred and succeeded along with Apple. Microsoft on the other hand was tone deaf and blind and kept presenting the same tired and clearly rejected options and arguments over and over and failed.
 
Microsoft had a decade long head start against Apple and Google. And their low market share was because Microsoft tried to force Windows onto a mobile device instead of using their considerable capabilities to be inventive. As a result, the market rejected Windows Mobile/CE and chose iOS which competed by providing a 10X better user experience. Google smartly copied iOS to give the market what it preferred and succeeded along with Apple. Microsoft on the other hand was tone deaf and blind and kept presenting the same tired and clearly rejected options and arguments over and over and failed.
Well that’s not what happened in the 2010’s because they launched smartphones
With a fully formed experience that people bought however they couldn’t get developers to make apps for it because of low market share because I sold them at the time called the Lumia phones
They just couldn’t get the apps for it and that’s why it ultimately failed
Nothing to do with design or how the OS was
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.