I'm not so sure why Americans don't understand that businesses in the EU market(s) can't overrule EU laws and regulations just by making products and services proprietary, and pull the "user privacy" card whenever anyone questions why it always implies some way for Apple to add another fee somewhere in all the encryption?
If it were that easy then any malicious entity, like a foreign government, could put any number of proprietary products on the EU markets and have them violate every law without facing consequences and be free to destroy our markets and economies.
That's not how things work anywhere.
In the eyes of the EU, the device, like an iPhone, is located in the EU and owned by the EU citizen who bought the iPhone. Therefore, the iPhone is subject to local laws and regulations. What proprietary shenanigans Apple has implemented into the hardware and software is secondary. Common sense stuff.
Exactly why should a business be exempt from local laws and regulations, because it's the World's biggest? Seems like an argument an American corporation could only succeed with in free-market-over-everything America.
Most importantly, it's not the EU forcing iPhone to change. It's Apple deciding to stay in the EU to retain access to its second most profitable market and agreeing to change its products and services to not face more fines or face a sales ban of all its products in the EU.
If Apple's ideas of "user experience" and "privacy" are its top priorities then it should wave goodbye to EU profits and go violate some other markets.
Y'all are just mad seeing how much Apple is willing to compromise to keep its EU profits, that Apple is really just like every other business despite all the "think different" and "iPhone=Privacy" its been hawking at us for decades.
All relationships, big or small, are made up of at least two parties. How can you blame one party, the EU, for being unfair to the other, Apple, if both parties are free to leave the relationship at any point?
You do realize that Apple is freely choosing to stay in this relationship, opting to compromise with its principles in order to retain its first priority, profits?! Could it perhaps be that Apple still stands to win more (profits) than it loses by giving up all of this control?