Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Perhaps Apple could agree to an outside standards body that certifies cables. You don't want to be running that much current through a cheep cable. At the same time, I understand why the EU does not want Apple to have a monopoly.

There's already the CE mark for Europe - though that's a consumer guidance mark rather than a mandatory requirement. I'd argue that that's fair though, those who want a certain level of assurance can buy cables with the CE mark, likewise those who still just want the cheapest cables can continue to buy and use them. Caveat emptor.
 
i think you completely ignored what i said.

entry-level iPads at the time couldn't do usb-c because that would be too costly to use the newer design and to support apple pencil 2.
My argument was that Apple could have switched to USB-C for all products earlier.

Also, what do you mean, “too costly”? Is USB-C expensive to implement?
 
Im sure apple will comply with the letter of the law. I want to thank the EU for equate that will accrue due to people throwing out their lightning cables.
It wouldn't have been this bad had Apple converted to USB-C 5 years ago when almost all but the cheap crap phones were already using USB-C.

But no, the greed for lightning cables was there. No environmental thought.
 
So when Apple removes ports all together, will the EU mandate that wireless charging be as fast as devices that can still use wired charging? Or penalize Apple for adhering to the laws of physics?
 
With ****** $2 cables floating around that could potentially cause harm to the users, I don't see anything wrong with a limitation if the device does not have a way to verify it is capable of handling the power.

We are close to more then tripling the amount of power running through these cables from what the original USB was capable off.

So the EU will compensate people who have their phones destroyed by cheap cables from China? Will they compensate people who have property destroyed when cheap cables melt and start fires? Complain all you want about MFI certifications but at least it guarantees that the cable will be robust enough to handle the draw from the device.

Is there really an epidemic of faulty cables causing fires and destroying phones? Think of how often people pick up a charging cable at a gas station on a road trip (I've done this multiple times). Think of all the cables that get sold at bargain retailers. None of these are MFI certified.

If these "cheap" cables are destroying phones left and right and causing fires daily, I think we'd hear more about this very serious problem. Of course there will be faulty cables, just like there are faulty products in every arena, but it doesn't seem like this is a big problem. Where's the data showing a disproportionate percentage of destroyed phones and fires caused by non-MFI cables?
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobthebuilderissus
My argument was that Apple could have switched to USB-C for all products earlier.

Also, what do you mean, “too costly”? Is USB-C expensive to implement?
it would be cheaper to have usb-c...? like, it might have been cheaper to have just implemented usb-c on everything when they did it with macbooks, and also they don't even need to change any charger designs, because they already can just toss in ipad chargers, and their block is already usb-c
 
My argument was that Apple could have switched to USB-C for all products earlier.

Also, what do you mean, “too costly”? Is USB-C expensive to implement?

My argument is that they cannot for the price point they're trying to reach.

The entry level iPads uses an older, tried and tested design which are cheaper to build. If you switched to USB-C, Apple Pencil 1 would not work as it needs lightning to charge. So you'd need to use the flat sided design which will make the entry level iPad cost more, but at least you can charge the Pencil 2 on the side. This is exactly why they still sell the entry level iPad today with the old design and Apple Pencil 1 support.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NetMage
My argument was that Apple could have switched to USB-C for all products earlier.

Also, what do you mean, “too costly”? Is USB-C expensive to implement?
It's not expensive to implement USB-C. What is expensive is the loss of revenue from the MFi program with a proprietary Lightning port. No one can manufacture a Lighting cable without Apple getting a cut, as they own the spec and standard.

Apple gets no cut from any USB-C cable sold.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: NetMage
So when Apple removes ports all together, will the EU mandate that wireless charging be as fast as devices that can still use wired charging? Or penalize Apple for adhering to the laws of physics?
Duh. The wireless charger will have to conform. Not that hard to understand is it?
 
it would be cheaper to have usb-c...? like, it might have been cheaper to have just implemented usb-c on everything when they did it with macbooks, and also they don't even need to change any charger designs, because they already can just toss in ipad chargers, and their block is already usb-c
But think of all of the loss in revenue from Apple not making $28 profit off of a cable that costs < $1 to make!
 
  • Angry
Reactions: NetMage
See, this is about control, not just the cable type. When you give the government an inch, they'll take a mile. I'm not surprised at all that they're continuing to overreach even further.
The big bad boogeyman government. Lol. This is about common sense. Standards bring many tangible benefits to society as a whole, as well as to the individual user/consumer. This has nothing to do with control. That's absurd. The individual will benefit from all devices using the same type of charging cable, from not needing different chargers for different products, etc. The only entity trying to control anything is (in this case) Apple by using an unnecessary proprietary cable type in order to make more money. That's the only "control" happening.
 
  • Haha
  • Disagree
Reactions: strongy and usagora
My argument is that they cannot for the price point they're trying to reach.

What do you mean?! They can do whatever they want. They just didn’t want to. Instead of making it a standard feature like every other tablet and peripheral since 2016, Apple chose to treat it like a premium feature.
 
EU Consumer: "Apple, why is my iPad shorting out and my battery damaged?"
Apple: "Your government is run by idiots who do not have engineering degrees and do not understand how a power cable is made."
Show me the evidence that non-MFI cables are causing an epidemic of damage. There are probably 100x as many non-MFI cables as MFI-certified cables sold. I see no evidence that there's an epidemic of poor quality cables wreaking havoc on devices. This just seems like another Apple marketing talking point that gets parroted by fanboys on sites like this. Where's the evidence? Where are the stats?
 
Really? Because they tried to pull this before with Micro-USB. And if they succeeded then, we'd still be stuck with Micro-USB and would not have USB-C/Thunderbolt/USB-4 today. This is actually a terrible thing. We'll be stuck with this connector for a long time, and innovation will be stifled because of it.

Also who plugs-in their iPhone anymore? I sure don't. MagSafe, AirDrop and Bluetooth anyone?
im crying laughing rn 🤣
uhhh anyone who isn't bouji like you?
like, you do realize not everyone has cash to spend on magsafe...?
also, don't cry when you get your phone stolen and have no backups or way to get into your phone as soon as they log you out bc YoU'Re WeIrD iF YoU PlUg In yOUr IpHoNe
also, i use a old iphone se as my personal cellphone, so that's not even a option for me :)
 
so... you're saying that preventing apple from making so only APPLE CORDS will work 100% with iphones is... overreaching? angry twitter user much?

Yes, it is. Their product, their choice. And, no, I've never used Twitter in my life.

What government? There is no EU government.

Oh for heaven's sake, you know what I mean. The EU is a partnership between multiple governments. Let's not pretend that it's some private organization that somehow has the power to impose regulations and fines on companies operating in the EU.

The big bad boogeyman government. Lol. This is about common sense. Standards bring many tangible benefits to society as a whole, as well as to the individual user/consumer. This has nothing to do with control. That's absurd. The individual will benefit from all devices using the same type of charging cable, from not needing different chargers for different products, etc. The only entity trying to control anything is (in this case) Apple by using an unnecessary proprietary cable type in order to make more money. That's the only "control" happening.

If it's not about control, then why are they trying to control how Apple designs their products and what cable certifications they require? I understand that you and others believe it's beneficial to consumers, but so would replaceable RAM in the Apple Silicon Macs, but of course that's not possible with SoC. So should Apple be fined by the EU for selling those to the EU market too? Where does this insanity end? Governments need to BUTT OUT of product design and let the consumers decide for themselves. If enough people stop buying iPhones because of this issue, then Apple will naturally adapt to the market. That's as it should be.
 
Omg

I love this so much. The EU is onto Apple's greedy shenanigans!

But you just know that Apple is 100% going to do its "Pros get it first then mid-tier in 1-2 years" because they can, technically, put out iPhones that don't adhere to the law right up to the deadline and not face consequences.

The means we'll still get all the proprietary USB-C b.s. with both the 2023 and 2024 line-ups.

The non-abiding iPhones won't even have to be removed from store shelves. Only the ones that Apple puts out after the deadline have to adhere to the regulations.

Amazing that the EU is onto it and will free us from the Apple's MFi b.s. from 2025 and moving on at the very least.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.