What government? There is no EU government.See, this is about control, not just the cable type. When you give the government an inch, they'll take a mile. I'm not surprised at all that they're continuing to overreach even further.
What government? There is no EU government.See, this is about control, not just the cable type. When you give the government an inch, they'll take a mile. I'm not surprised at all that they're continuing to overreach even further.
Perhaps Apple could agree to an outside standards body that certifies cables. You don't want to be running that much current through a cheep cable. At the same time, I understand why the EU does not want Apple to have a monopoly.
My argument was that Apple could have switched to USB-C for all products earlier.i think you completely ignored what i said.
entry-level iPads at the time couldn't do usb-c because that would be too costly to use the newer design and to support apple pencil 2.
It wouldn't have been this bad had Apple converted to USB-C 5 years ago when almost all but the cheap crap phones were already using USB-C.Im sure apple will comply with the letter of the law. I want to thank the EU for equate that will accrue due to people throwing out their lightning cables.
With ****** $2 cables floating around that could potentially cause harm to the users, I don't see anything wrong with a limitation if the device does not have a way to verify it is capable of handling the power.
We are close to more then tripling the amount of power running through these cables from what the original USB was capable off.
So the EU will compensate people who have their phones destroyed by cheap cables from China? Will they compensate people who have property destroyed when cheap cables melt and start fires? Complain all you want about MFI certifications but at least it guarantees that the cable will be robust enough to handle the draw from the device.
it would be cheaper to have usb-c...? like, it might have been cheaper to have just implemented usb-c on everything when they did it with macbooks, and also they don't even need to change any charger designs, because they already can just toss in ipad chargers, and their block is already usb-cMy argument was that Apple could have switched to USB-C for all products earlier.
Also, what do you mean, “too costly”? Is USB-C expensive to implement?
My argument was that Apple could have switched to USB-C for all products earlier.
Also, what do you mean, “too costly”? Is USB-C expensive to implement?
It's not expensive to implement USB-C. What is expensive is the loss of revenue from the MFi program with a proprietary Lightning port. No one can manufacture a Lighting cable without Apple getting a cut, as they own the spec and standard.My argument was that Apple could have switched to USB-C for all products earlier.
Also, what do you mean, “too costly”? Is USB-C expensive to implement?
Duh. The wireless charger will have to conform. Not that hard to understand is it?So when Apple removes ports all together, will the EU mandate that wireless charging be as fast as devices that can still use wired charging? Or penalize Apple for adhering to the laws of physics?
lol, explain my iphone se batt is at 89% health and it hasn't been charged by a genuine apple cord since 2017, lolEU Consumer: "Apple, why is my iPad shorting out and my battery damaged?"
Apple: "Your government is run by idiots who do not have engineering degrees and do not understand how a power cable is made."
But think of all of the loss in revenue from Apple not making $28 profit off of a cable that costs < $1 to make!it would be cheaper to have usb-c...? like, it might have been cheaper to have just implemented usb-c on everything when they did it with macbooks, and also they don't even need to change any charger designs, because they already can just toss in ipad chargers, and their block is already usb-c
They won’t stop working once the USB-C iPhone is released. And you don’t think the connector was going to be changed at some point regardless of laws?yes, it’s amazing that hundreds of millions of lightening cables become trash.
The big bad boogeyman government. Lol. This is about common sense. Standards bring many tangible benefits to society as a whole, as well as to the individual user/consumer. This has nothing to do with control. That's absurd. The individual will benefit from all devices using the same type of charging cable, from not needing different chargers for different products, etc. The only entity trying to control anything is (in this case) Apple by using an unnecessary proprietary cable type in order to make more money. That's the only "control" happening.See, this is about control, not just the cable type. When you give the government an inch, they'll take a mile. I'm not surprised at all that they're continuing to overreach even further.
YupEU Consumer: "Apple, why is my iPad shorting out and my battery damaged?"
Apple: "Your government is run by idiots who do not have engineering degrees and do not understand how a power cable is made."
This is why the government should but out of stuff like this
My argument is that they cannot for the price point they're trying to reach.
Show me the evidence that non-MFI cables are causing an epidemic of damage. There are probably 100x as many non-MFI cables as MFI-certified cables sold. I see no evidence that there's an epidemic of poor quality cables wreaking havoc on devices. This just seems like another Apple marketing talking point that gets parroted by fanboys on sites like this. Where's the evidence? Where are the stats?EU Consumer: "Apple, why is my iPad shorting out and my battery damaged?"
Apple: "Your government is run by idiots who do not have engineering degrees and do not understand how a power cable is made."
I really hope DC doesn’t do dumb stuff like this 🤞This is why the government should but out of stuff like this
Umm… what? Yeah there is they have a legislature.What government? There is no EU government.
im crying laughing rn 🤣Really? Because they tried to pull this before with Micro-USB. And if they succeeded then, we'd still be stuck with Micro-USB and would not have USB-C/Thunderbolt/USB-4 today. This is actually a terrible thing. We'll be stuck with this connector for a long time, and innovation will be stifled because of it.
Also who plugs-in their iPhone anymore? I sure don't. MagSafe, AirDrop and Bluetooth anyone?
so... you're saying that preventing apple from making so only APPLE CORDS will work 100% with iphones is... overreaching? angry twitter user much?
What government? There is no EU government.
The big bad boogeyman government. Lol. This is about common sense. Standards bring many tangible benefits to society as a whole, as well as to the individual user/consumer. This has nothing to do with control. That's absurd. The individual will benefit from all devices using the same type of charging cable, from not needing different chargers for different products, etc. The only entity trying to control anything is (in this case) Apple by using an unnecessary proprietary cable type in order to make more money. That's the only "control" happening.
too late!I really hope DC doesn’t do dumb stuff like this 🤞